Do you know how to dance tango?usmarine wrote:
ummm...how is israel messing it up? takes two to tango no?
Search
Search results: 10,858 found, showing up to 50
BF:BC 2 is coming out in 2010. I think SC2 and Diablo III will also be out in 2010. I might be picking a footy game as well, but I want to see what improvements will PES 2010 get. Probably Max Payne 3 too. Oh, and the game it's Modern Warfare 2 without COD.
I'll throw some titles I really want to get. Modern Warfare 2 is a must. This I'll get for PC, coz I think shooters are better on PC than any console. Then, for PS3 I'll get inFamous, Uncharted 2, Heavy Rain, Ratchet & Clank 2, and God of War 3 (if it is really coming this fall). Those are for sure. Then I'm on the fence with many titles. What about you?
You don't know me. Pls die.Uzique wrote:
This is exactly what I thought in summary of this thread.usmarine wrote:
correctSonderKommando wrote:
Well it may be a hoax, but it gave serge a chance to waive his PS3 fanboy flag around like an idiot again, amirite?
How can you reduce your being and life into such a pathetic form of fanboyism? Go outside.
Edit: mods if you delete my insults then delete other people's too pls.
Basically, you are saying that you can't walk safely without a gun. It must be awful living that way.Mitch wrote:
Bro, thats completely flawed. Unless we're under a complete martial law police state theres no way a cop is gunna be able to do shit.sergeriver wrote:
1-Law, a good Justice system and the police are the best protection against criminals.Mitch wrote:
1. Guns are the best tools for protection, and for crime.
2. As said in number 1, guns are good for crime. Criminals commit crimes.
3. Criminals commit crimes by breaking the law. That is why they are criminals. So, a law that bans guns will not be followed by said criminal.
4. Now, criminal has a gun, and he is going to commit a crime because he knows innocent people do not have guns.
5. Innocent person gets raped, shot, robbed, and has no tool more powerful or effeciant than the gun the criminal has.
Thus crime is easier for the criminal.
However, if the criminal knew there was a chance he could get shot back, the criminal would not be so inclined to rob you.
It's a god damn proven fact that gun laws do not stop the use of guns by criminals.
And finally, guns were protected by the 2nd amendment for one main reason.
Protection against an over powering government.
Whats happening in the world?
Gun laws are getting more restrictive.
Government is becoming more controlling every single day.
2-Criminals commit crimes, they are used to guns, they probably know how to use them better than Joe the plumber. So, if Joe has a gun he still gets shot. If Joe doesn't have one, he could be safe.
3-Yes, criminals break the law, and therefore they are criminals. If they use a gun they would be breaking another law.
4-Wrong. Criminal will try to commit a crime regardless of what innocent people have. Maybe, if he knows that a person doesn't have a gun, he'll treat the said person better.
5-See point 1 again.
Your walking down the street and 2 dudes walk up behind you, throw you in the nearest alley and start beating you up and taking your shit.
Police? Yah, if someone calls 911 and you have 5-10 minutes to wait.
That.Poseidon wrote:
thisusmarine wrote:
correctSonderKommando wrote:
Well it may be a hoax, but it gave serge a chance to waive his PS3 fanboy flag around like an idiot again, amirite?
No dumbass. You can't blame all Jews for the actions of Israel. GTFO.rammunition wrote:
so you now cant call a jew a jew??
political correctness gone mad!!!!!
Lolghettoperson wrote:
Isn't the Nazi leader, Angela Merkel in London today?
Actually, you are being a prick.rammunition wrote:
whats wrong with stating the facts???
You should change the word Jews for Israelis.
Happy April Marines Day.usmarine wrote:
correctSonderKommando wrote:
Well it may be a hoax, but it gave serge a chance to waive his PS3 fanboy flag around like an idiot again, amirite?
1-Law, a good Justice system and the police are the best protection against criminals.Mitch wrote:
1. Guns are the best tools for protection, and for crime.
2. As said in number 1, guns are good for crime. Criminals commit crimes.
3. Criminals commit crimes by breaking the law. That is why they are criminals. So, a law that bans guns will not be followed by said criminal.
4. Now, criminal has a gun, and he is going to commit a crime because he knows innocent people do not have guns.
5. Innocent person gets raped, shot, robbed, and has no tool more powerful or effeciant than the gun the criminal has.
Thus crime is easier for the criminal.
However, if the criminal knew there was a chance he could get shot back, the criminal would not be so inclined to rob you.
It's a god damn proven fact that gun laws do not stop the use of guns by criminals.
And finally, guns were protected by the 2nd amendment for one main reason.
Protection against an over powering government.
Whats happening in the world?
Gun laws are getting more restrictive.
Government is becoming more controlling every single day.
2-Criminals commit crimes, they are used to guns, they probably know how to use them better than Joe the plumber. So, if Joe has a gun he still gets shot. If Joe doesn't have one, he could be safe.
3-Yes, criminals break the law, and therefore they are criminals. If they use a gun they would be breaking another law.
4-Wrong. Criminal will try to commit a crime regardless of what innocent people have. Maybe, if he knows that a person doesn't have a gun, he'll treat the said person better.
5-See point 1 again.
COD4 is an amazing game. It's better than KZ2 IMO.Kptk92 wrote:
lmfao i couldnt imagine the giant uproar my school would start - majority of them only play CoD4 because they don't have enough brain cells to play a better game
Didn't you hear? The ME is now known as April Fools Day.ghettoperson wrote:
Was the link not a clue?Burwhale wrote:
If thats an April Fools day joke, then its not very funny.
OK assuming its real, its a step in the right direction, hope it works, many havent in the past.
The article says that it's being released first for PS3 and later for PC.AussieReaper wrote:
PC / PS3 exclusive ffs, sergeRavyGravy wrote:
i raged when i read the title
Hey, that was my first console.bogo24dk wrote:
Are you sure ? I heard that it's going to be a atari 2600 exclusive.
http://www.ign.com/aprilfoolsdayIGN wrote:
Developer Infinity Ward announced today that Modern Warfare 2, the sequel to Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, will be released as a PS3 exclusive on nov 10 this year. The PC version is expected to hit the shelves on Xmas, and the X360 version was cancelled due to technical limitations.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/aprilfoolsdayBBC wrote:
In a shocking and secret meeting Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the President of the Palestinian Authority Abdel Aziz Duwaik signed a peace deal between the two states and arrived to the long awaited Two States Solution.
The thing is the US report took longer than a day to write, and the Chinese one just one day, not very clever IMO. Just a retalition, like many threads here.AussieReaper wrote:
The US made one first, but hey, let's ignore that irony and focus on the irony of China.sergeriver wrote:
It seems they took a long time to make this report, let's say one day. GG China.
In South Central or New Orleans too?lowing wrote:
Neh, I help out in my kids classrooms and on their field trips when I am able.FatherTed wrote:
lol, it's an image and a half thoughlowing wrote:
I am more than willing to help kids, but that fiddy cent shit will never happen
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7914357.stm
It seems they took a long time to make this report, let's say one day. GG China.China has responded in detail to a US report published this week criticising China for alleged rights abuses.
Beijing released its own report on the US, saying crime is a threat to many Americans and racial discrimination prevails in social life across the US.
When US officials first published their report on China, Beijing told them to mind their own business.
The BBC's James Reynolds, in Beijing, says the reports are a standard yearly exchange with little practical impact.
The 9,000-word Chinese report depicts a bleak picture of the US, saying violent crime is a widespread threat to people's lives, property and personal security.
The American people's economic, social and cultural rights are not properly protected, say the Chinese, and many young Americans "have personality disorders".
ATG making a thread about happiness? What's next? Lowing helping kids in South Central Los Angeles while listening to 50 Cent?
Not a myth, very real thing. And you are arguing about semantics here? Cmon. Give me a fucking break. A lot of Jews and Arabs have common roots. The difference between you and me is that I don't support Israel killing Pals and you want to see Israel gone and you are anti-Semite, I mean the common use of the word. And just FYI the Holocaust is not a card, it did happen. Have some respect ffs. And nobody said the only people dead during WWII were Jews. But those 6 million were picked by the asshole of Hitler just because of their genes. Awesome. Isn't it?rammunition wrote:
"anti Semitism" is a myth, jews are not Semites, only arabs aresergeriver wrote:
In every Christian/Muslim country there's anti-Semitism.Mekstizzle wrote:
"Anti-Semitism" only exists in Europe/Middle East. Or you could say it only really exists in the Christian/Muslim worlds. Doesn't exist everywhere, no chance of that. It didn't exist in South/East Asia (prior to the arrival of Christianity/Islam) when regions where domination by Hinduism/Buddhism/Shinto/Taoism/Confucianism etc.. and it still doesn't exist in those cultures where there isn't significant Christian/Muslim influence.
Mmmm, there are only 15 million Jews and 4 billion Christians/Muslims. Do your maths.Dilbert_X wrote:
And in every muslim/jewish country there is anti-christian sentiment.
In every jewish/christian country there is anti-muslim sentiment.
So what?
In every Christian/Muslim country there's anti-Semitism.Mekstizzle wrote:
"Anti-Semitism" only exists in Europe/Middle East. Or you could say it only really exists in the Christian/Muslim worlds. Doesn't exist everywhere, no chance of that. It didn't exist in South/East Asia (prior to the arrival of Christianity/Islam) when regions where domination by Hinduism/Buddhism/Shinto/Taoism/Confucianism etc.. and it still doesn't exist in those cultures where there isn't significant Christian/Muslim influence.
You know this is a racist comment but you don't care. You blame a whole group of people for not acting like an individual when Katrina took place instead of blaming the Government for the lack of help and assitance. How could they possibly know what to do? They told them to leave a couple of hours before Katrina hit NO. Bush administration failed like in every single thing they did. Now you have the nerve to say black people are to blame instead of a cunt who didn't have a clue how to run a country. And the proof is out there. Take a look at what he did to the US. I can't believe you're still with this thing.lowing wrote:
The comparison is valid, I do not car3e about their race, the fact is this is the same caliber of people that were in New Orleans., and the caliber of people that generally would vote for obamasergeriver wrote:
Another racist comment Lowing. We must asume black people work as a group and not individually? All the people from New Orleans that didn't leave their homes were at DC? Cmon. Find a hobby. You are trying too hard. Seriously.lowing wrote:
1. 2 million brothers and sisters made it to DC for the inauguration, but they couldn't get out of New Orleans before Katrina.
Another racist comment Lowing. We must asume black people work as a group and not individually? All the people from New Orleans that didn't leave their homes were at DC? Cmon. Find a hobby. You are trying too hard. Seriously.lowing wrote:
1. 2 million brothers and sisters made it to DC for the inauguration, but they couldn't get out of New Orleans before Katrina.
Coz people are dumb.Dilbert_X wrote:
How so?Sergeriver wrote:
Ati-Semisitm is prejudice or racism against Semite people. Despite that, it's accepted to use the word to define prejudice and racism against Jews. And believe me, anti-Semitism exists. Everywhere. And it existed way before Hitler and Israel.
Why does anti-semiticism exist 'everywhere'?
Ati-Semisitm is prejudice or racism against Semite people. Despite that, it's accepted to use the word to define prejudice and racism against Jews. And believe me, anti-Semitism exists. Everywhere. And it existed way before Hitler and Israel.Dilbert_X wrote:
Same as anti-dliberticism?FEOS wrote:
Of course it exists...THEY HAVE A DAMN NAME FOR IT.
It has a name, therefore it exists.
There is no such thing as anti-semiticism per se.
Its just racism.
Maybe we should ask why there is no no made up word for victimisation of other races.
You are directing it at me. So, what if I say "Where's Kojima". That isn't directed at you. I know people voted for those. I voted for Media Molecule not Kojima to be nominated anyway. Don't be so pissy.Poseidon wrote:
-sigh- How many times do I need to repeat myself?Zimmer wrote:
Serge is right though, where the fuck is Kojima?
If you think someone should have been in the final 5, you should have nominated them or gotten people to nominate them.
It's really not that hard, people.
Spoiler (highlight to read):
I'm not directing this at you specifically ZimZim, just people in general who always ask "where's ____"?
Miggle said Ubisoft sucked. And they published Assassin's Creed ( I know it's from 2007 so what?) and FC2 which IMO doesn't suck. I'm not saying they deserved to be Dev of the Year, I just say they don't suck. And don't forget Prince of Persia.Poseidon wrote:
I can't tell whether you're trying to defend Ubisoft or taking the side of Miggle and I.sergeriver wrote:
*cough* Assassin's Creed and Far Cry 2 *cough*
Because FC2 was absolutely terrible, and Assassin's Creed came out in '07.
*cough* Assassin's Creed and Far Cry 2 *cough*
And justice for All. Not being sarcastic, I'm just listening to Metallica.Stingray24 wrote:
So since you can’t see the evidence there’s no due process and human rights? We’ve released terrorists previously who have gone on to involve themselves in more terrorist acts. Let the military do their job and try these guys. That’s the due process you’re looking for.
What a cliche.Commander Cunt Imold wrote:
''We shouldn't make policy decisions based on human rights and legal advocacy groups,'' retired U.S. Navy Cmdr. Kurt Lippold said in a telephone interview. "We should consider what is best for the American people, which is not to jeopardize those who are fighting the war on terror — or even more adversely impact the families who have already suffered loses as a result of the war."
ATG you need taxes. And 100 years ago the USA wasn't the Superpower it's today with taxes. Relax man, let Obama do his job. Taxes well spent = people living better.
Today I downloaded Savage Moon from PSN and it's a must have for all the TD games lovers. Great graphics, nice variety of enemies and lots of options. Great game for $10. I strongly recommend it. I don't know if it's available on X360, but if it is you Xbox owners get it.
Absolutely agreed.usmarine wrote:
pals get just as much support from other countries. but there is a difference skittles. our allies take an active approach. arabs just sit back and bitch.Mekstizzle wrote:
I'd still say that the underdog would be the Arabs/Muslims. I mean cmon, Israel has the complete backing of the USA and some other European countries. Israel probably wouldn't have lasted this long and would've lost one of the wars a long time ago (even the first one, war of independence) if it wasn't for them having strong backing from various countries mainly the USA, and the USSR/Eastern Bloc was pretty friendly too considering the amount of Eastern Europeans with ties to the USSR that were in Israel, they were in the perfect position. Saying that, the Arabs really did perform terrible.
I wanted to clarify that. Sorry for getting involved in your private conversation.FEOS wrote:
Is your name "Dilbert", serge?
Of course it's real, it existed for thousands of years. The only thing I said is Israel isn't helping to curb anti-Semitism.FEOS wrote:
OK, Dilbert. How do you square your theory with the fact that Jews were persecuted--strictly for being Jewish--long before Israel even existed? Long before any acts of zionist terrorism in the Mandate of Palestine?
How does that fit your theory?
Antisemitism is real. The fact that other groups have suffered as much or more than the Jews throughout history does not suddenly mean that antisemitism doesn't exist. The issues are unrelated.
One can't criticize anyone they wish to...they are labeled "racist", regardless of the applicability of the term.
I never said Israel was the only reason either. I hate seeing Israel doing these things because it's not helping their cause. In the long run, Israel needs to look forward to live in peace with their neighbors, and slaughtering kids isn't the way to achieve that. And believe me, I do care about Palestinians, and the only way I know to help them is voicing my dislike for Israel's actions. And of course, Hamas isn't helping either. I opened several threads about Darfur, Zimbabwe, Genocide, etc. I find your accusations of yesterday a bit unfair, but let's forget it. You are free to think whatever you want.Poseidon wrote:
You make an assload of sense.
I'm not saying that it's the ONLY reason, but most people do use Israel's actions to justify their own personal hatred. I mean, really...do you honestly think all of these people suddenly truly care about the well being of the poor Palestineans? I don't see these people going up in arms about what's going on about Darfur and whatnot.
I mean, perfect example on these forums...you get people like CamPoe who debates Israel just as much as he debates anything else, really. And then you get the people who suddenly pop up out of nowhere just to criticize Israel, acting like they care oh so much about the poor, impoverished Palestineans. Doesn't that strike you as just a bit...odd?
No, you fail because you didn't even understand my point and have the nerve to say "so basically this and that fail".Poseidon wrote:
Right over your head once again, Serge.sergeriver wrote:
Very cheap, as always. And you know what those people never knew Israel as it is today. So, I don't see your point. Different times.Poseidon wrote:
6 million people would disagree with the OP.
If they were, y'know, alive.
My point is that Anti-Semitism does not come from Israel's existance or it's actions. People only use Israel's actions as an excuse to show their true colors and feelings.
Anti-Semitism is probably LESS today than it used to be, but it's still quite prevalant.
So basically:
OP = fail
You = fail
Earth = fail
Cosmos = fail
Byah!
/thread
If you have comprehension issues that is not my problem. Feel free to read everything I said, and nofuckingwhere I said that the main reason for anti-Semitism were Israel's actions. I fucking said that Israel isn't helping at all and it's giving the fucking anti-Semite idiots an excuse to hate Jews even more. Do you fucking understand? If you don't have anything smart to say then STFU.
Very cheap, as always. And you know what those people never knew Israel as it is today. So, I don't see your point. Different times.Poseidon wrote:
6 million people would disagree with the OP.
If they were, y'know, alive.
I didn't kill Jesus. I'm suggesting that Israel should stop violating Human rights asap, regardless of how this affects Jews around the world. You bet your ass Israel killing Palestinian kids isn't helping Jews, as Hamas throwing rockets and blowing shit isn't helping the Palestinians cause.san4 wrote:
I'm not sure I'm following you. It's true that Israel's actions make Jew-haters feel more free to express their views, but so does your responsibility for killing Jesus Christ, the involvement of Jews in the world banking crisis, Jewish ownership of newspapers, and the fact that Jews are called The Chosen People in the bible. Should Jews try to avoid giving Jew-haters these excuses too? You are suggesting Israel should alter its actions to avoid giving irrational assholes an excuse to express their views (or worse). Where does that stop? And what kind of life is that?
That happened before Israel was created. If that happened without Israel committing crimes against humanity, why give them the excuse to hate Jews now? I never killed a fly, yet I'm called things because of my last name. You see? I don't justify people being anti-Semitic, I just think Israel is not helping the situation tbh.san4 wrote:
Because you will always be trying to placate irrational people and they will find an excuse anyway. Two thousand years of trying not to give them an excuse led to ovens.sergeriver wrote:
Why give the haters an excuse? I tell you I've been called names a lot of times and I don't even practice, just because of my last name. People will always be dumb, but if you give them the excuse...san4 wrote:
There will always be something to get the Jew-haters riled up. There always has been. Before Israel existed, Jews were expelled from England, France and Spain, subjected to restrictions in Russia, and mass-murdered in Germany. And you are saying Israel is causing hatred of Jews to increase? Wake up Serge. Israel is just the latest excuse.
In this case my father was a River fan but he didn't like football that much. I started to like football when I was a kid and once I asked him to take me to the stadium. Since that day I became addicted to River. I've been to more than 400 matches so far. I love football, and I cried several times because of it. That passion can't be described. Only football can give you such thing.oug wrote:
That feeling you speak of... is it because your dad probably brainwashed you about River for example? Frankly I don't know about you, but that's how it works here.sergeriver wrote:
To me they are shareholders, and this is why. Even when the organization you are fan of is a private company, there's a feeling, a sentiment, that you don't buy, you just own. You can't break the love of a true fan for his team. I can't understand when they move a team in the US to another town. I'm a fan of River Plate, a football team from here, most Euros know it. And I don't have stocks, but I attend to matches, watch them on tv, and cry when they lose a final. I'm a shareholder, even without shares.
People basically recruit their kids to be fans of their team. It's pure brainwashing. And most of the times you can't even reason with guys like that - who otherwise happen to be totally normal. When it comes to their team they just lose all touch with reality. They're not fans of a sport, they're followers of a team. The best kind of customer there is. No matter how crappy your product, they'll always support it 100%. Fuck, in Greece politicians even use teams with large fan bases to support their campaign! It's a classic case of seller - buyer relationship.
But you can buy a 9mm anywhere. Ironic, isn't it?
Cam is a ginger. What?Braddock wrote:
My brother is over there at the moment... luckily for him he's not a ginger in that heat.
Edit: I read your other post. Nvm.
Why give the haters an excuse? I tell you I've been called names a lot of times and I don't even practice, just because of my last name. People will always be dumb, but if you give them the excuse...san4 wrote:
There will always be something to get the Jew-haters riled up. There always has been. Before Israel existed, Jews were expelled from England, France and Spain, subjected to restrictions in Russia, and mass-murdered in Germany. And you are saying Israel is causing hatred of Jews to increase? Wake up Serge. Israel is just the latest excuse.sergeriver wrote:
No, you are wrong. In a perfect world this wouldn't happen, but in the real world most people are dumb assholes who casn't differentiate between a country and a Religion/ethnic group. I'm sure Israel is contributing to increase anti-Semitism in the World.san4 wrote:
Wow Serge, blaming Jews for being hated? Blaming Israel for the irrational views of anti-semites? Israel's actions aren't increasing anti-semitism, they are only revealing what was already there.
Who's G'd?Lisik wrote:
Not "create" but "recreate". Thanks G'd British has brains to understand the meaning of word Archeology.Beduin wrote:
And then they said fine, we will create Israel here?Lisik wrote:
I did not said they were liberated, i said they were given independence. Before the Brits they was Ottoman Empire, after Brits they became to be independent countries. Except Palestinians of course, they rejected their independence.
They took their land away and gave it to you dude.Lisik wrote:
I did not said they were liberated, i said they were given independence. Before the Brits they was Ottoman Empire, after Brits they became to be independent countries. Except Palestinians of course, they rejected their independence.