dude, never ever ask any of the questions this thread brings to mind
Search
Search results: 4,181 found, showing up to 50
never did see nancy grace's coverage of it, i'm sure it was comical to say the least, the way she becomes Judge Dredd at every new scandal
"I am the law!"
"I am the law!"
it means i have a week to load up on carbs and electrolytes in preparation to not remember yet another new year's eve
even better, drafts by nature are impermanent
i say it's time to show pictures of the conniving cunt all over the news, just as the pics have been spread of the wrongfully accused
if i was in world war two they'd call me spitfire!!
and yeah, had the US not tangled hitler up on the east and in africa then russia would've been scrooooooded
and yeah, had the US not tangled hitler up on the east and in africa then russia would've been scrooooooded
no, my dealer got shot
they are currently testing the draft machines and lottery system, but they do that once every few years "just in case", odds are, the only way we'll ever truly be rid of the need for a draft system would be right after we're all dead
he also had wooden teeth, damn anti-arboreal bastard
yes i did, apparently you didn't, and you missed where i pointed out the fallacies in that link which is basically just a mirror of every other "US IS EVIL" environmentalist site, for example, how many SUV's were in the US feeding off of all the trees between 1650 and 1850.EVieira wrote:
PS.: Did you actually read the link you posted or looked at the pictures? It just completely prooved my point...
it'd be interesting to see where you made up......i mean got your numbers from, try to get it from a site that counts the trees that lumber companies plant instead of just the ones cut down, very vague defense, we still have our forests after 6000 years
here's a fun site, by some hippy pissed off by rush limbaugh
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mblowers/def.html
note two things, the word "virgin" used in describing the forested areas, meaning the replants aren't counted
and the dates/locations of the deforestation patterns, meaning it occurred both before america underwent it's industrial revolution, and in areas that are sparsely populated at best, meaning the human influence is negligible
here's a fun site, by some hippy pissed off by rush limbaugh
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mblowers/def.html
note two things, the word "virgin" used in describing the forested areas, meaning the replants aren't counted
and the dates/locations of the deforestation patterns, meaning it occurred both before america underwent it's industrial revolution, and in areas that are sparsely populated at best, meaning the human influence is negligible
sad thing is, that's more likely to keep him out of the whitehouse than the fact that he's actually unqualifiedsergeriver wrote:
Do you think that a black guy called Hussein could become President of US?IRONCHEF wrote:
I don't think the 22nd cancels any provisions of the 12th as they are two separate scenarios.
As for me, I'd prefer that neither of them make the white house..but if Hillary does win, and she considers her husband for a position, I'd hope he'd be chief of staff or some cabinet position as he'd be excellent in that capacity. Vice President would be lame even if he could serve. I'd much rather Hillary pick one of the dem, or even a moderate republican presidential candidates for VP.
But this is assuming Barrack is beaten by Hillary in the primaries, which I hope doesn't happen.
ok, here's my proposal, be responsible for cleaning up your own damn mess and quit trying to find ways to make someone else do it for you
How's that rainforest going down there? Still expanding at record-breaking rates? oh wait, i had that backwards.
How's that rainforest going down there? Still expanding at record-breaking rates? oh wait, i had that backwards.
pretty much
or, i don't know, you could count the fact that you're not speaking german, or you're not a slave, or you're not part of a totalitarian communtis regime a result
or you could count the millions of people, even civilians like me, that earn their living off of that 100 billion a result
or you could count centuries of advancement in medicine, engineering, architecture, civilization in general as a result
unless of course you are german, then by all means speak it , perhaps i should have said "speaking Nazi"
or, i don't know, you could count the fact that you're not speaking german, or you're not a slave, or you're not part of a totalitarian communtis regime a result
or you could count the millions of people, even civilians like me, that earn their living off of that 100 billion a result
or you could count centuries of advancement in medicine, engineering, architecture, civilization in general as a result
unless of course you are german, then by all means speak it , perhaps i should have said "speaking Nazi"
as a citizen of a former french holding, i understand he is eligible to run for office in france, let them have him
because the kyoto protocal is horseshit, nothing more than global communism designed to hamstring the more developed nations by forcing them to finance the developement of the worst polluters, if you were truly concerned about pollution you would be whining about china and india not signing it, oh wait, they're not even included in it, that's right, because it's not about pollutionmcminty wrote:
Aside from all these crackpot ideas, why don't we just cut emissions first. USA, take the lead and sign the Kyoto Protocal. Then, countries in the third world and such will follow the USA's lead. Too bad greed gets in the way of the environment...
Mcminty.
yeah, they just give us things like modified plastics, new surgery/organ transplant techniques and tools, life saving devices, advancements in solar energy, why the hell do we keep going up there?dubbs wrote:
Most space missions are also, but we still have them.haffeysucks wrote:
LMFAOROFL. Of course not. It would be extremely costly and ineffective.
someone needs to take that girl to waffle house, get her some grits
and biel > alba
and biel > alba
most people would feel blessed for living in a country where the "poverty stricken" are also the most overweight segment of the populacearabeater wrote:
What does this have to do with the American people? I think you mean this is why you hate the US government. Majority are dumb? Did you even know that there is a spell check button here? Overweight, I can sorta agree with but thats just a stereotype that we have. The majority of Americans are not overweight. At least not the ones I have seen.E7IX3R wrote:
Tis why I hate the majority of americans.
because the majority are dumb and over weight.
wahh waah wwaaaahhh, let's give it away for free to all the crack whores and 35 year olds still working at burger king because they'd rather smoke up than go to school
the war on poverty is the only one you can't win by throwing money at it, at least you see results from the pentagon
the war on poverty is the only one you can't win by throwing money at it, at least you see results from the pentagon
you're using "invade" in the context that hitler invaded france, technically fine, it was an invasion, but more the resumption of defensive actions put on hold a decade earlier than an unwarranted aggressionRick_O_Shea678 wrote:
kr@cker wrote:...we didn't invade...
I can't really have a debate with you if that's your starting point.
And I don't much care what "stand-up comics turned political experts" say. I don't let late-night television decide my views, nor do I let "24/7 news channels" do it. But you don't have to read 800 books on American diplmomacy to realize that this....what did you call it..."enforcement of a treaty" (LOL) is a 180-degree turn in policy. At first the government admitted this, and tied it to 9-11, WMDs, and so on. But since those arguments have been exposed, the government is now naked before us, left with weak excuses like "he was violating a treaty" whilst trying to avoid the subject altogether.
re: "hussein is the bad guy"...of course he is. He always has been. But there's always bad guys out there. My point remains: to deal with this badboy, they invaded him, and that was a huge huge change in policy. (and, in the belief of many, it was a huge huge mistake to deviate from the long-held traditions of peace&democracy as the foundations of policy.)
it's just that you make it sound as if someone in DC woke up one day and decided to invade without any justification for the war, and yes, WMD's were related to the surrender treaty (LOL), try readin it for once. also, i can't recall anyone in any administration stating that iraq was responsible for 9-11.
if you don't enforce treaties (LOL), they are useless, like the UN
this should help
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin … ubl243.107
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
hey! look what's number one and two on the list!!
go on and hug, he's all warm and stuffCameronPoe wrote:
Gunslinger is all talk. ;p jk!
i dunno, alot of that sounds like they're hawking up loogies to me, same thing with french, and in spite my being from the south we really aren't into that.................ghettoperson wrote:
LOL! +1GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Im learning a bit of farsi from some persian friends in school and Im taking my next arabic class pretty soon. Its a difficult language to scratch the surface on but once you get the hand of all the alif's and the bah's and understand that there is pretty much 3 or 4 words for every single thing in the language. you got words that have feminine and mascular "vowels" for the singular, the plural and the 3rd person. farsi is very similar to arabic except for the obvious differences in pronunciation and a lot of letters in farsi arent in arabic. something else about arabic is that I believe that there are like 17 different dialects. for example, you have iraqi arabic, egyptian arabic, palestinian arabic, sudanese yada yada yada...All arab media broadcasts are in modern standard arabic as is the koran. chances are if you get in a language class, youll be learning modern standard arbic. Its a beautiful language and hot arab chicks making the gargling sound in their throats to pronounce certain sounds that dont exist in the english alphabet really turn me on.
farting with a woman, however, is a great bonding experience
I saw that on drudge, i love the donald
Larry the Cable Guy: "Saying guns are responsible for killing people is like saying spoons made Rosie O'donnell fat"
Larry the Cable Guy: "Saying guns are responsible for killing people is like saying spoons made Rosie O'donnell fat"
why is he molesting that car?
read the membership roll of the democrat national party, you'll see thousands of people the same waysergeriver wrote:
I don't think Ironchef hates America. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Ironchef American? How can he hate America? It doesn't make any sense.King_County_Downy wrote:
He just hates America for some reason.sergeriver wrote:
Why? Did he endorse Iran?
mission at that time= remove saddam from power=mission accomplishedoChaos.Haze wrote:
Well it could be that the article is fake. Or it could be that the people we kill aren't armies. This isn't a war, so it can't be judged like one. A war is a battle between 2 or more ARMED FORCES. Since there's only one in this situation, I think it qualifies as something else. And thirdly, it could be because W did a speech on an aircraft carrier in front of a huge VICTORY banner, and yet 3 years later, we're losing more troops and civilians than we were that day.King_County_Downy wrote:
They like to kill eachother a lot. I think that's a pretty good K/D ratio myself. I'd even go as far as to say that's a REALLY GOOD K/D ratio. How is it that some people think we're losing this again? The numbers speak for themselves.
I'm not even inherently against the war, I just think that it's a shitty situation. I mean basically now, there are 2 groups going at each other, and we're playing the middlemen, and it sucks. This is all based off my best friend's comments about Iraq when he got home. I really don't know anything.
new mission=assist in securing iraq while new government is established=mission ongoing
it took us, what, 12 years to sort out a constitution, and they did it in 2, and they've had 3 successful elections, hardly a loss
missed that whole exchange, but you've forgotten a few steps, we didn't invade, cliff's notes version is something like thisRick_O_Shea678 wrote:
oChaos.Haze wrote: On a side note, does anyone else see the futility of trying to fight a war as the "good guys"?
"Good guys" don't invade other countries.
oChaos.Haze wrote: But since we made the first move...
As the Bard would say...ay, there's the rub. Bush violated one of the basic tenets of American diplomacy, he invaded another country. Notwithstanding short and forgettable (but still regrettable) episodes like Grenada, the United States does not do this. They subvert in other ways, yes, but they've always held a moral high ground about invading other people. It's always been their trump card. Peace & democracy, peace & democracy. It's the two things US diplomacy has always been about (and free markets, but that's less obvious). Bush's invasion flies in the face of the entire American diplomactic tradition.
As to the OP, there won't be a military draft for this war. The US will pull out, or get others to send in more troops, well before a draft in enacted.
iraq invades kuwait, declares intention to own everything from egypt to pakistan
kuwait asks west for help, as does saudi arabia
bin laden propositions SA declaring his forces can protect them from iraq
SA chooses to go with the coalition forces of desert shield/storm, spearheaded by the US
iraq is pushed back to baghdad, and surrenders
hussein is allowed to stay in power so long as he follows the terms of the surrender treaty
hussein ignores said terms for more than a decade
after waiting over a decade for the UN to enforce the surrender treaty, the US along with 3 dozen other nations decide to enforce said treaty and call hussein's bluff
hussein is the bad guy, not george bush, despite what all those really cool stand-up comics turned political experts say
what'd ya use?
Gunslinger was learning one or two of the eastern languages i think, you might try asking him.
no, he thought the military didn't have enough white boys in it, and a draft was needed for affirmative action purposes, then the pentagon did this thing called "research" and proved him wrongoChaos.Haze wrote:
Yeah I remember seeing this. Doesn't he want it for reasons similar to what I stated above? I could be completely misinformed. But I was under the impression that he felt like we treat war too lightly, and by adding a draft, it might make us rethink when we go. He could just want a draft though, I'm too lazy to be arsed with reading it, haha.kr@cker wrote:
if it's a draft you're worried about, look to charlie, not george
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061120/D8LGK3D00.html
damn, the link was removed
but this is nothing new for him, he's been preaching this for years
funny thing is, everyday down here, the papers representing the work force of the military, the unions and such, not the top brass, have been pushing for higher enrollment numbers for ages, as well as non-stop coverage of people re-enlisting, seems the one problem they have is helping people find ways to sort finances and spend some time with their families between the tours they volunteer for non-stop. I regularly meet people itching to make their third run through the sandbox, some of them barely un-packed before talking of going back. I suppose there are worse problems for a military to have.
if it's a draft you're worried about, look to charlie, not george
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061120/D8LGK3D00.html
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061120/D8LGK3D00.html
favorite music:Kmarion wrote:
http://www.myspace.com/ahmadinejad ..lol
Be sure to check out his friends.
music is banned by islam
Favorite movies:
movies are banned by islam
Favorite books:
Books other than the koran are banned by islam
i think for a split second, i might turn the eyeball so i can look at myself, possibly the only person ever to do so without a mirror or similar gadget
then i would freak the hell out and pass out
then i would freak the hell out and pass out
tried and /failedBolvisOculus wrote:
You could just right click the link and hit "View Image".kr@cker wrote:
I'm too lazy
but i saw it when i got home
aston martin's better than any of those, not that i don't likey the audi's and sub's
dunno, i'm getting sick and tired of lame-ass CG, time for someone to recruit henson studios and make some real effects for a movie
you will burn in hell (probably supervised by ted himself) for comparing her to his majesty!!!!!usmarine2007 wrote:
Maddona.kr@cker wrote:
do ya'll have your own Ted Nugent?
damn
do ya'll have your own Ted Nugent?
oooh, good one, i thought maybe evac field for choppering out people, but that didn't make much sense when you've already got a runway a couple miles longGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
maybe a place to stage artillery in case of invasion?
anyways, i give up, i got work orders to do, i'll check back tonight
edit:
OOOOO OOOOO oooOOOOOOOOOO
for making a refugee tent city, makes sense with it being already in the middle of the residential area here, with the schools, hospitals and stuff all around
I'm too lazy
you're going to hell, lemme know if you find a shorcut
looking at the map it's smack dead in the middle here, with residential and warehousing on all side of it, so i can't really see any geographical advantage, it's not even close enought to the flight line to serve as any kind of backup mustering field, and getting fuel out there wouldn't be fun
because the US, UK and such don't make speeches calling for the complete destruction of another nation, or attack unprovoked
i don't see what's so hard to understand about it, despite your opinion, the US doesn't go into war unprovoked, while nations like iran and noko practically promise to
i don't see what's so hard to understand about it, despite your opinion, the US doesn't go into war unprovoked, while nations like iran and noko practically promise to
damn, that's gonna keep me up tonight, i have to drive through the golf course here several times a day
don't tell yet, i wanna brainstorm a little
(ok ok it's more like a cranial breeze)
don't tell yet, i wanna brainstorm a little
(ok ok it's more like a cranial breeze)
*.jpg is your enemy
did i ever tell you about that time muhammed gave me a salmon helmet?
Not teddy bears?
I'm sorry, but in spite of that tough haji exterior I just know you're a sucker for huggles.
it's all just a front, don't hide it
I'm sorry, but in spite of that tough haji exterior I just know you're a sucker for huggles.
it's all just a front, don't hide it
rather, anyone NOT like family guy?