lol...not really...and as for cash, take a look at ExxonMobil's 10-K if you want to talk about printing cash...Ender2309 wrote:
why they don't fail: most successful business on the planet. ever.
Search
Search results: 219 found, showing up to 50
Dude, from the Engrish (lol) in your post it sounds like you have been cheating at more than web design. You should seriously spend some time and learn something on your own. I see big troubles for you in the future if you are always relying on others to do your work for you.d.cripz wrote:
Hey guys, I have a to make a website titled Personal Portfolio. I am also complete the website as its due on Monday, June 18. This is worth 10 % of my grade so i would like to make it as cool as possible. I was wondering if someone would make my a logo with the words "Dan's Portfolio" in it. The size can be roughly 2-2.5 inches all around, and i'd like to have it animated in some way(possibly the words are animated). Anyways, if your interested in helping feel free to make it as creative as possible. It is about my portfolio.
Thanks, (sooner the better... its due after this weekend).
Also, if you are as screwed as it sounds, you should be willing to pony up the bucks instead of continuing to prey on other peoples kindness.
Good luck getting your work done....
Unless you narrow down your search (e.g., city or state) you will not get a useful answer. You can get a 2,000 sqft house in Michigan for less than $300k whereas in California that $300k will buy you a 1000 sqft (or smaller) house. In NYC or LA $300k buys you a nice refrigerator box to sleep in...Mong0ose wrote:
OK, I'm a first time buyer here in the UK, and as we all know house prices over here are just stupid at the moment, so i was wondering what my money would get me somewhere else, like the US for example
I'm looking to spend around £155k which i suppose is around $300k give or take - over here that gets u really nice 1 bed flat or a half decent 2 bed semi (in the midlands that is)
what r house prices over in the US like for comparison?
by the way this is purely hypothetical, I'm not looking to buy in the US or anywhere else
Go to Realtor.com as an example for prices.
Exactly...Apple service is the shit. Seymore, ever hear of a phone?Marlboroman82 wrote:
weird i have never had a problem, actually everyone i know who has dealt with has said the exact opposite.seymorebutts443 wrote:
Apple service blows monkey chunks, took them 5 months to respond to an email of mine, i sent the email because iTunes wouldnt let me create an account to purchase music.
Creative is anything but...their products will never amount to much and are nowhere close to the iPods. It is NOT the name in digital sound...lol, that is funny.Elamdri wrote:
I don't like iPods. They have poor connectivity with their PCs, they tend to freeze up and die too often for my liking, and they don't have a removable battery, so if your battery dies, you have to send it in to be refurbished.
I tend to go with Creative products. Creative is THE name in digital sound, they have been around in the industry FAR longer than Apple, in fact, Creative had MP3 players out a year & a half before the iPod. In fact, Creative OWNS the patents to Apples software, because it was ruled too similar to Creative's. I would say if you are interested in a creative, go with a ZenMicroPhoto, but they just recently stopped production on them. If you are looking to replace an Ipod, I would go with the Zen Vision: M. Its a little chunkier than an iPod, but I like them better.
If you are using an iPod with a PC that is your first problem, go out and buy a Mac and then you will see what computing is like!
Ok guys, so I have been following this game for a few years and had pre-ordered it years ago when they were in the delay, delay, delay mode.
I am looking to add another game to my rotation and simply want a buy/no buy answer. I have owned dozens of games, some good, some great and some crap. In your opinion, buy? or no buy?
Thanks guys.
I am looking to add another game to my rotation and simply want a buy/no buy answer. I have owned dozens of games, some good, some great and some crap. In your opinion, buy? or no buy?
Thanks guys.
I personally think it is funny as hell that MSX has decided to take over BF2...I have never run into these guys and I don't have any plans of being on the leader board...actually I uninstalled BF2 after the friggin "unable to connect to server" problem this past week...I friggin hate EA, one day the game works, the next it doesn't.
If there was only a way to get EA to actually have to blow a pile of money. It is unreal how little "customer focus" the company has, they only care about themselves...
If there was only a way to get EA to actually have to blow a pile of money. It is unreal how little "customer focus" the company has, they only care about themselves...
The reason is simple, keep the best for yourself, everything we sell to our allies is still superior to most of the weaponry in service today, just not the cutting edge stuff. Why should we share everything...? We spent all the money developing the weapons/iPods/Software (you pick the product) why should everyone get off easy just buying a product....sorry, the world doesn't work that way!
Ty posted some stuff about how the US supplied various countries with weapons, not sure where you are from (don't know where noizyland is) but most countries sell weapons and other stuff to other countries, be it Iran, Iraq, Somalia, what have you....the countries that don't sell stuff just don't have anything to sell (at least nothing anyone wants).
I don't have a problem if the US keeps the "good stuff" for themselves, or if the UK, Australia, Iran, etc. do the same, it is their right if they were able to invent the thing...guess what folks, life isn't fair, if you suck and can't develop something for yourself then you don't deserve to have/use the product until the inventor sees fit...if ever.
Oh, TY the US is not based on fear other than the fear that everyone wants to mooch off them for aid, weapons, etc...take a look, the US helps more countries in the world than any other...not that the US is the best country in the world but we are at least trying to do something (right or wrong) rather than sit on the sidelines bitching about everyone else (many countries in this bucket).
Ty posted some stuff about how the US supplied various countries with weapons, not sure where you are from (don't know where noizyland is) but most countries sell weapons and other stuff to other countries, be it Iran, Iraq, Somalia, what have you....the countries that don't sell stuff just don't have anything to sell (at least nothing anyone wants).
I don't have a problem if the US keeps the "good stuff" for themselves, or if the UK, Australia, Iran, etc. do the same, it is their right if they were able to invent the thing...guess what folks, life isn't fair, if you suck and can't develop something for yourself then you don't deserve to have/use the product until the inventor sees fit...if ever.
Oh, TY the US is not based on fear other than the fear that everyone wants to mooch off them for aid, weapons, etc...take a look, the US helps more countries in the world than any other...not that the US is the best country in the world but we are at least trying to do something (right or wrong) rather than sit on the sidelines bitching about everyone else (many countries in this bucket).
Criminal...I don't ever want to hear you complain about anyone or anything again...
Yes....BUY A MAC!!!
Vista CHUGSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS........
Vista CHUGSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS........
Ok dude, seriously grow up...it sounds cool to nail a bunch of women but you must be late teens or early 20's. Give it 10 years and you will realize how silly all this is...
It's just like, just like a mini-mall......lolzzzzzzzzzzz
Dude, as far as I am concerned that is great flying...not much air to air but then again you smoked the J10 before it got in the air a dozen times or so....
Keep it up...
Keep it up...
Most of these guys are illiterate and can't type a sentence to save their lives. The pictures of Muzicant3 show that he is a 30-40 year old (if real photos) but he writes like he has a 3rd grade edumication (that is for him so he can understand hee, hee).
It is run on 90% of the servers where I have a ping of less than 200. Thus if I want to play BF2 I often must play Karkand...it is boring at times and I try to switch or just try different tactics/kits...
Mac, Mac, MAC!!
Fancy is WRONG----
Mac's can run 100% of Mac software PLUS 100% of Windows software...you get much better access to software with a Mac.
Mac's have better security.
Mac's boot instantly rather than waiting several minutes for a windows machine to load.
Mac's just work better.
Mac OS X is light years beyond Vista, XP, etc.
Mac's offer a more enjoyable user experience
Go MAC, seriously you will not be sorry...just look at all the terrible Vista reviews...
Check out www.macdailynews.com
Fancy is WRONG----
Mac's can run 100% of Mac software PLUS 100% of Windows software...you get much better access to software with a Mac.
Mac's have better security.
Mac's boot instantly rather than waiting several minutes for a windows machine to load.
Mac's just work better.
Mac OS X is light years beyond Vista, XP, etc.
Mac's offer a more enjoyable user experience
Go MAC, seriously you will not be sorry...just look at all the terrible Vista reviews...
Check out www.macdailynews.com
Creative is quite the opposite...a over complicated brick. Oh and for the person that said 1gb nano, the nano comes in 2, 4, 8gb versions. Shuffle comes in 1gb.Ninja_Monkey wrote:
half the people said an ipod just proves they are idiotsSargeV1.4 wrote:
is not an iPod
fuck ipod go for creative you wont be sorry
100 million consumers can't be wrong about the iPod...iTunes + iPod = HAPPINESS!!!!!!
Everything else is something that will be an antique in a couple years because the company went out of business or they keep changing products dramatically to try to get it right...the iPod is already there.
Sarge, if you are ruling out the iPod then you are not getting the best...only something that "also ran"....
Suck it up and get a Nano...amazingly light, durable, crisp screen...or just buy something that doesn't work as well.
Suck it up and get a Nano...amazingly light, durable, crisp screen...or just buy something that doesn't work as well.
sorry, what an idiot...
Adam, I don't know any other way to say this but to say that is one of the most IGNORANT posts I have read here. I would guess you are a teenager or someone that things they are smarter and better than they really are.adam1503 wrote:
Okay, so this is a pretty big question. A lot of Americans seem to believe that their country was solely responsible for saving Europe from Nazi occupation during WWII. They claim to have single-handedly won the war and to have saved everyone.
On the other hand, many Europeans (infact, most of the rest of the world) believe that America didn't play as crucial a role as they lay claim to. America joined the war more than half-way through, and only after they were bombed at Pearl Harbour. They also were responsible for introducing the fission bomb to the world, and for using two on Japan.
Is it just me, or are many Americans full of crap? How can they claim to have won the war and to have saved Europe from the Nazis? Who liberated much of mainland Europe from Nazi occupation? Who was able to fend off the Nazi war machine from invasion during the Blitz years?
We should clear this up once and for all: the US cannot claim to have saved Europe from the Nazis. The US did not win the war alone.
(EDIT: I wanted to add a poll here, but there doesn't seem to be an option for it...)
Think about it this way, if the US hadn't gotten involved in the war or provided all the support that they did before joining the war (weapons, planes, food, supplies, etc.) then everyone in Europe (and the UK) would be speaking German right now.
The French were useless....the British while putting up a good fight were limited to defending their own land before the USA got involved...the Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, etc, etc, etc, were all defeated. Sure Hitler may not have gotten into Russia, at least not for a while or ever, he still would have held Europe.
It is amazing how stupid people can be, it is like the French who were desecrating the American grave sites in Normandy after the Iraqi war started...what a bunch of USELESS UNGREATFUL COCK SUCKERS!!!! American's DIED to help out others, there was no threat of Hitler attacking the USA. And all you can do is say you don't want the American's buried there "polluting" your soil. You DON'T DESERVE YOUR SOIL!!!
So Adam in summary, YES without us you would not have won WWII, YES you are clueless and YES I hold little hope for you in the future.
cool
Seriously, a Brit lecturing American's on racism....who brought the slaves to America, yeah, I thought so.
I would hope for at least $50 to get my investment back...
Zurich, Switzerland, Schnell-CH
Sweet list
Sweet list
This is where I have to disagree....if they were all the same then why would 75% of people buy the iPod over every other mp3 player???? Ahem...because THEY FUCKING ROCK, are so easy to use a friggin monkey could use it and has excellent expansion options (i.e., 3500 iPod accessories on the market).{BMF}*Frank_The_Tank wrote:
they all work the same.
Apple iPod...simple to use, new iTunes has cover art (cool feature), allows you to organize and view by album (another cool feature).
The iPod is the easiest mp3 player to use, it is light and the new nano's are thiner, lighter and more durable than the previous model.
More options with auto jacks, home stereo options and future home media center. That's my $0.02
The iPod is the easiest mp3 player to use, it is light and the new nano's are thiner, lighter and more durable than the previous model.
More options with auto jacks, home stereo options and future home media center. That's my $0.02
I like BF2....as long as it is fun and there are servers I will play.
Sweet vid....nice kills
Well, I assume Retestrak's favorite server is K&P...lol
I would probably take the Distinguished Service so I wouldn't have to commander whore for the next 80 hours.
I would probably take the Distinguished Service so I wouldn't have to commander whore for the next 80 hours.
Too funny... +1
Well said....criminals are criminals, how do you punish people for crimes...or do you let them run free...Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Its propaganda and you sheep are once again buying into it.
Also consider,
1) They were stealing.
2) That car is not a taxi cab.
3) That video is very old.
Lots of HUGE ego's in this thread.....compensating for a lack of social life or just a bunch of juvenile kids?
Regardless of "who's help/hints are beter", thanks for posting, it can't be said too much...I can't stand a pilot that doesn't allow me to use the TV's (i.e., nose too far down). Good job, thanks for the effort. +1
The only thing I have noticed is that infantry only also means no arty....at least that seems to be the case on every server I have been to running IO. Pretty much no point in being a commander (not really but cuts your decisions down a ton).
Holy crap...no kidding..~Smokey~ wrote:
Congrats
Someone doesnt like you
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/5273/tyme414sy4.jpg
Congrats.
That stuff is sweet...just goes to show you what science can come up with...
What the hell are you talking about...?? What the hell am I "lying" about? If you are talking about the KDR, my current rounds are 2:1 these days, how the hell do you explain a constant improvement in the ratio...if I was a 1:1 it would go nowhere...law of averages and big numbers.Krysiss wrote:
Don't tell lies because stats don't lieCheddarmuff wrote:
Sarge, why is a person either good or a noob/casual player? And what do you define a casual player as...someone who doesn't care about stats or someone who has less than 3-5 hours a day on BF2?SargeV1.4 wrote:
Every single decent player I've spoken to is unhappy with this patch.
Every single newbie or casual player has told me to stfu.
I see a pattern here.
I don't consider myself a noob (usually end rounds with a 2:1 or greater KDR....old noob days furt the ratio but look at history, steadily climbing) and I am quite happy with the patch. Anything that actually allows me to PLAY the game without constant crashes is fine by me.
Sure the playing style has canged from 1.12 to 1.14...can no longer chuck C4, PKM was ok then super then ok then crap, noob toobing has changed, and clay whoring has gone up and down. That is all fine, I can learn to adapt.
Lighten up on the general assumptions and stereotypes....
Man up or shut the hell up.
*Edit....nice teamwork, I assume this is you: http://bf2s.com/player/68062585/ one of those medics that doesn't help their teammates and is only interested in healing themselves...nice, you are right, stats don't lie...NEXT!
I agree completely, rank has NOTHING to do with skill...we could all be 4 star generals if we had the time to dedicate to the game...I would love to get an a server with all these high ranking players that think they are the shit and wipe the floor with their asses...I am not the best player out there but I can hold my own...EarlOfBronze wrote:
What the hell does low rank have to do with fucking bunny hopping. If anything I've found its the higher rankers who bunny hop and dolphin dive, take a look at Volx ffs. The only thing rank is an indicator of is how many hours you've put into the game.Branjo wrote:
One thing would be to add an option to servers were only a specific rank or above can get in to play, 1st LT would be a good start then all the little hoppers can fuck off and play in the kids servers where their whiny little asses belong.
Sarge, why is a person either good or a noob/casual player? And what do you define a casual player as...someone who doesn't care about stats or someone who has less than 3-5 hours a day on BF2?SargeV1.4 wrote:
Every single decent player I've spoken to is unhappy with this patch.
Every single newbie or casual player has told me to stfu.
I see a pattern here.
I don't consider myself a noob (usually end rounds with a 2:1 or greater KDR....old noob days furt the ratio but look at history, steadily climbing) and I am quite happy with the patch. Anything that actually allows me to PLAY the game without constant crashes is fine by me.
Sure the playing style has canged from 1.12 to 1.14...can no longer chuck C4, PKM was ok then super then ok then crap, noob toobing has changed, and clay whoring has gone up and down. That is all fine, I can learn to adapt.
Lighten up on the general assumptions and stereotypes....
Call me crazy but I like the patch. The new map is something different (although seems to be a nade war at the alleyway). So far *fingers crossed* no CTD's and no "problems with my connection".
I could care less about bunny hopping, delay to get up as I never relied on it to kill/get ahead in the game. I can still kill people with my guns, nads, clay's.
I say THUMBS UP to the patch so far...
I could care less about bunny hopping, delay to get up as I never relied on it to kill/get ahead in the game. I can still kill people with my guns, nads, clay's.
I say THUMBS UP to the patch so far...
BiBi, great shots, how do you follow the shells?? I didn't see the Frapps logo on the screen...can you do this in game or after in battlerecorder? Thx. +1BiBi wrote:
Some nice tank shots on Zatar,
http://media.putfile.com/Zatar-Pixel
http://media.putfile.com/Zatar-Pixel-2
BAN dolphin diving, who cares about bunny hopping...the dolphin spammers are LAME-O's
Nothing personal penguin...but what a waste...100mb and all you do is chase around a mec soldier trying to kill him (which I guess you finally do)...I want my time back..
Aargh!!!
Aargh!!!
What a bunch of retards...seriously, IT IS A GAME
Teflon, I assume this is your second account....62 kills is nice, sure 30 deaths sucks but it is at least a 2:1 ratio which is fine as far as I am concerned (for gound pounding)
*cough**ahem* sure it is easy to get a.....say 10:1 in a plane...92% of kills in vehicles, sound like anyone you know **cough**
*cough**ahem* sure it is easy to get a.....say 10:1 in a plane...92% of kills in vehicles, sound like anyone you know **cough**
It actually just repeats...liquidat0r wrote:
Thats impressive!
man, it goes for ever
did it get you...
Go Bushy, it's your birthday....