killing guy while they are capturing flags... what a thrill...
Search
Search results: 55 found, showing up to 50
just played a bit for the first time today... too much armor and the ticket rate was too damn fast (maybe it was the server)... guess what my answer was...
hmm... isn't the same way that, who you guys call native americans, might have thought when they saw their lands invaded? wasn't the united states built with the labour of immigrants?fadedsteve wrote:
Without 30,000+ agents, miles of modern fence line, water impedements, watch towers, motion sensors etc. we will get another 12-15 million more people that arent supposed to be here!!!!
immigrants will probably work in the jobs that most of you will not want to do. why are you so against them? they are a major risk? not more than some of the americans that live there (or any other person that lives anywhere and has a major brain issue).
illegal immigrants need to have their situation regulated for everyones sake.
again... your country was made of immigrants...
i love new york because of that... the whole world is there... you must hate it so much...
i do... the only backdraw in that is that i need to keep my lighter closekonfusion wrote:
Nobody smokes marijuana without tobacco
thin and clean... that's the way i like 'em...
marijuana and wine are both nice if used in the propper way... even sex can harm you and i don't think i'm going to stop doing it...
honestly... you should play the fallout serie...Fredrik wrote:
Oh no, i went and bought wow, only with guns
stalker makes much more sense for those who played and liked it.
all others seem to think that stalker is a fps game...
gtr2 and rfactor... forget arcade...
wrong... it can't touch steven seagal... ever saw anyone touch him?Doms wrote:
Baur>everything. Even chuck norris. *instantly dies*
i do... and still rox...PBAsydney wrote:
Nope, obviously nobody has balls anymore.DTAC wrote:
--- on/off topic --- anyone still using a "ball" mouse?
that's one of the most stupid things to do... you should never have the punish vote on... why? because most of the time the stupid ones are the ones that get tked and it's their fault... if someone tk's on purpouse just report him to an admin or call a vote kick and write the reason... i always apologise if it's me who as the fault when tked...Stomper_40k wrote:
My clan server auto bans for one round if your punished three times in the same round so you'll be surprised how many players get kicked for the first.
about the recon... it's like... moooooveeeee....
isn't that a windows error screen?Smaug wrote:
That's so you can play tetris while you're waiting for the round to start.FesterTheMolester wrote:
yea.. model... look at the glowing blue thing on the side
since that announcement they changed the spread of the AR if i'm not mistaken... so... they can't be trusted in that...Flecco wrote:
Because they said there would be no content changes or additions in future patches.
ok... here's a thought... did you ever saw a white bullying another white guy? is that being racist? someone calling someone chubby or four eyes or skinny or whatever?Phantom2828 wrote:
BUT I think he means that a higher percent of black people seem to be dumb ignorant loud mouthed punks.
the major issue here is the lacking of a proper education not racism... anyone with a brain and some education should be conscious enough to act properly.
most of those black guys who call others "whitey" are just a bunch of guys that act like that because they are together and they want to show their superiority like many other white guys that do the same to white guys... it's not a matter of racism... it's a matter of looking for someone to bully others. they would propably do the same to anyone who disagrees with them anyway...
btw... i quoted you but it's not meant for you it's for everyone.
the best tweak is kind of simple... we should not be able to spawn while we're on the customization panel...
i'm always changing to something that my team my need at the moment to have right when i spawn and i never can make the changes fast enough...
i'm always changing to something that my team my need at the moment to have right when i spawn and i never can make the changes fast enough...
is that possible?DeathUnlimited wrote:
collect dogtaggies from teammates...
me too... but a wireless one.....teddy..jimmy wrote:
A cheap ball mouse..
who needs a fancy high tech mouse when we can kick their ass with a ball one...
i don't give a sh!t about your discussion but by replying pointing out his grammar mistakes... that's lame and shows that you're IQ is not very high... you lost all the reason and the only way to prove that you're better is to point out anything else that wasn't even in the discussion...spawnofthemist wrote:
Spelling errors:
You're.
Your.
Adaptation.
tactically.
stabilizer.
support.
a while.
your.
and you call me retarded?
www.dictionary.com
you should also utilise the spell checker that has been implemented in to the forums by duk0r.
to all those that say that the stabilizer sucks and that they don't need it... remember that when you face another sniper and he uses it to get a faster shot at your head while you're still trying to adjust your sway...
you do not know how many kills i get that way... shooting better and faster gives you a huge advantage and if you fail to see that... grab an assault rifle.
reset you controls on the options...
i'm against any kind of wars but let me tell you... the geneva convention treaty is the biggest BS i ever saw.Geneva Conventions
if it's a war it's a war... don't make rules for it... it's suposed be bloody, violent and unfair... this BS always reminds me of an asterix comic where the britains always stop their fighs at 5pm for tea and since the fog would rise afterwards they would only fight in the next day... get real... it's a war... if you don't like them don't make them.
and how about bf2142tracker.com?
you, my friend, are seing to much tv...MorbiD.ShoT wrote:
no light sabers. Laser Guns are a terrbile idea anyway because of the fact that: 1.) They would be terribly humongous. 2.) Most likely the beam of light would continue on to infinity once fired. 3.) Bullets are more fun.
most of the lasers cannot be seen... they are not in the eye sight light spectrum.
laser beams have the same propagation speed of light but, just as it with light, there is a loss of power of the beam because it get dissipated in particles floating in air (only in vacuum that doesn't happen)... but it can go through some good distance all depending of the power and type of focus of the laser.
light sabers are suposed to be made of plasma not light... plasma can be almost solid and light can't... light sabers are actually possible to be made but lets get real... who in is perfect mind would use it instead of a gun? the "use the force luke" is... how can i say this... bs?
laser guns are a terrible idea because there is not a good portable energy supply in the world... any sniper would love to have a rifle where the amo cannot be disturbed by wind or rain...
last... bullets are not fun... BB's are fun...
what? they learn how to make a memory dump?-TAC^Opie- wrote:
One of my favorite fixes is that pressing escape to get out of loading a match that sux no longer results in 45 minutes of "Unloading Resources." One press and bang, you're out.
that has to do with the experience that every single person goes through, the hability of learning and the reactions to what he had learn... what in this is not explained by science? bigger brains... better brains... nothing in the whole word is an exact copy from another... everything is different and that is what makes us all so different from one another...dlbenson1979 wrote:
but I also know that there is something out there that makes every person different.
Case study in point: If you were to have a group of people living in a area where they had no contact of the religions and issues of the world from birth, they would still manage to love and hate each other(among other feelings). I mean, if person A hits person B with something (because they dont' know better) and person A cries. That image will have an impact on person B. (could be good or bad).
I guess I really don't know where I'm going on this. I believe in science. But I also believe that there are some things that just can't happen on science alone.
we do have one thing that is similar to everyone... like any other predator, do you know that every single person is able to and will kill if needed? most of them just don't do it because they are afraid of the consequences...
like i've said... it's all in the brain, how you get the info and how you process it... just pure chemestry...
i'd guess the best one should be... BF:ice age...
that way people could tk for a mammoth or a saber-tooth tiger
that way people could tk for a mammoth or a saber-tooth tiger
yes... but what does god have to do with another lifeform?P581 wrote:
So you believe in aliens, but not god?dalexa wrote:
i do believe in other hand that we only know a part of the world we are living and that many other kinds of lifeforms may be present sharing our space...
isn't god supposed to be the all mighty, all compassionated creator of all things?*
aliens are lifeforms like you, me or anything else and notice that i said anything... we are not better than cats, trees, wales, parrots or any other living thing in the planet... and there must be lots and lots of different life forms that we don't know... in our planet and in others...
*not every god is the creator of everything but you know what i ment with that...
i believe that this is a very touchy subject. too many questions can be made to mess up peoples mind...I'm an Athiest
examples...
- if there is a god and he created everything... who created him?
- if life appeared from the big bang... what created what maded the big bang or even where it occured?
like these there are plenty of question with valid points...
but no... i don't believe in any god... when we die we are just like any other animal or plant... our body just decomposes and no soul is goes to hell or heaven...
i do believe in other hand that we only know a part of the world we are living and that many other kinds of lifeforms may be present sharing our space...
lol...Riddick51PB wrote:
why didnt you just say "PENIS"
we dont know your exchanges before "COCKPIT", like were you typing "VAGINA" at mm1 then followed that with your "COCKPIT"?
let me try to imagine that...
"hey... the bomber is free... come... lets jump into the penispit..."
the other says
"what?!?"
again... all of those are from EA... well... maybe dice is the one to blame for our problems... well... moh was full of glitches on the corners... players just disapear on the window corners...DocZ wrote:
steam had a bit of a bumpy start, but now it kicks EA's ass 7 days a weeks.... BTW HL2 kicks more ass then BF2......
me and my sniper were shooting at those glitches from time to time and i always got some guys there...
i saw that one... well that and almost all the rest... it was sad... tito puente got fired...the_hitman_kills wrote:
do you remember that episode of Simpson's where they found oil under the school and Mr Burns built a slanted oil rig and stole all the oil.
maybe thats what the Romanian's did?
man... odds? what odds? i just want the server and the internet line capable of running that without problems...VeNg3nCe^ wrote:
16 vs 1337? I don't think those are fair odds
it's time to ask...Aardcore wrote:
Nine years and still counting LOLSub-Zero79 wrote:
Duke Nukem Forever!!!
"what are you waiting for? christmas?"
hmmm... let me see one thing...
steam is owned by valve, right? right...
valve is owned by electronic arts, right? right...
then... steam is owned by electronic arts...
guys... you'll start to see rushed games coming out, like episode one, from them... and they will have the same quality as those released from ea... and that is... crap...
ea wants one thing... profit... nothing more than that... an if that means rushing buggy games out... they will do it...
steam is owned by valve, right? right...
valve is owned by electronic arts, right? right...
then... steam is owned by electronic arts...
guys... you'll start to see rushed games coming out, like episode one, from them... and they will have the same quality as those released from ea... and that is... crap...
ea wants one thing... profit... nothing more than that... an if that means rushing buggy games out... they will do it...
naaa... never gonna happen... there are no young/minor vampires... or adult gymnasts on romania for that matter... sorry mate...Erkut.hv wrote:
Ed: I just realized Iran fekked with Dracula's people. Bad move. Vampire Gymnasts flying in at night. The ultimate Spec Ops group.
wrong... it's the only one that's out there that doesn't suck too much... it's different...leetkyle wrote:
YOU ALL PLAY BATTLEFIELD 2 DON'T YOU!?!! THEN IT MUST BE A GOOD GAME. GEEZ./end.
and since ea became the new micro$oft and it's buying almost every single good game company... it's going to be hard to get some new kick ass games from now a days... sad but true
flag captures should be only allowed to be made by soldiers... on foot... never with tanks, apc's, jet, helis or whatever vehicle you might be using... after all... you are changing a flag...Mj.Blindfisch wrote:
Great strategy,also for China on Wake.
If you can make it to the carrier unnoticed you'll have Chinese all over the carrier.
Steal all their equipment and then you can rape the carrier with 2 J-10s and 2 F-35B.
But on public servers mostly not everybody gets the idea and you hover and hover and nothing happens.
Btw,did you guys know that in BF1942 you could capture flags with a plane?
It was just flying a very tight circle over the flag.
Haven't tried that in BF2,but should be very difficult to pull off with these fast jets.
requesting UAV overflight, over.david363 wrote:
Enemy Boat Spotted
btw... 1.4? what 1.4?
translating numbers... that i would like to see...Spearhead wrote:
Mathematical problems for space-borne missions can completely fail even if they're off by .000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001.stryyker wrote:
considering a joint space mission failed due to a metric-imperial miscalculation, the margin for error during war, especially with orders, is too great to overlook.
With something as simple as translating, especially in Europe, they'd have to be pretty damn stupid to screw it up.
"hey... that's a zero..."
"what? not in my language!"
i just don't get one thing... why don't they all use the f*cking metric system... it's all brits faultSpearhead wrote:
NASA f*cks up every now and then, and they're dealing with American numbers and the English language. It's a wee bit harder than you think
man... the ESA (european space agency) speak in french, english and german... they do translate all the stuff and guess what... it works just fine... and they do calculations also...
uhhhh wait... i thought that there was no army there yet because the U.S. don't have any interest in it to happen...<[onex]>Headstone wrote:
HAd to say NO, MAinly because, The UN cant even put together a peace force to goto the Border with Isreal Now, Getting an Army together that has 200 different warped views on things would be next to impossible.
you mean down to the napolean ages? the one that got his ass wooped while attempting to conquer portugal? unless you ment about asterix and obelix... man... those guys rocked....:XDR:.PureFodder wrote:
Go back two hundred years and the French were kicking ass all over Europe. As much as mocking the French is fun it's not overly justified.
i don't like it... and the reason is that most of the players play for their stats and not for the team...
arround 80% of BF2 players will not play in a unranked server just for the fun of playing in a team...
correct me if i'm wrong...
arround 80% of BF2 players will not play in a unranked server just for the fun of playing in a team...
correct me if i'm wrong...
is it? the fact that it has many games doesn't make it good... makes it more affordable... you have to reccon that battlefield 2 is expensive... besides... CS it's packed with cheaters and that is why most of the cheaters are still there...TheCanadianTerrorist wrote:
Too bad there is more CS players then Battlefield 2 players. So obviously, it is a more liked game.dalexa wrote:
jumping jack for zx81 and quake (the original)thank god it's only for you... cs sux big time... it's one of the worst fps multiplayer game i've ever played...TheCanadianTerrorist wrote:
For me, it's definitly Counter-Strike 1.3-1.6. FPS' would be nowhere without it.
Good game.
i'm still waiting for a game that can give me, online, the enjoyability that MOH spearhead gave me and since swat4 was not well recieved by others i lost my interest in that one too dispite the fact that it is very good...
i'm waiting for moh airborne and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. if it ever comes out... maybe they will shake the online fps game world... we have to wait and see...
BF2 would be great if there was an elimination mode... 16 vs 16 in a 16 map... one team defending... the other attacking for an objective... your dead... you have to wait untill to the next round... that way the true teamwork would appear and the "rambo" mode on certain players would disapear... like it is now, some players don't care about dying because they will just respawn after some seconds... but you play CS... you know how this kind of modes work...
CS can be fun to play but all players need to be clean and preferably on the same teamspeak so that we can call eachother names.
an if you knew anything about that you would know that it wasn't the firepower that made the russians powerful... germans lost a huge amount of soldiers by starvation when they tried to conquer russia... russians just burned everything and retreated leaving the axis away from supplies. THAT was what turned the war arround... that and the fact that there were too many fronts of battle in the war...Fallschirmjager10 wrote:
you do know we gave them supplies to make the katyushua rocket trucks... and if you dont beleive me i will try and find soruces on the web. and the russians would have lost the war if it wasnt for usa and britian.
cars should only be provided by request... it's an asset that you are throwing away..
lol... US is what it is now because of the ww2... almost all the european great minds fled to the states...Gentlesouljah.e wrote:
we should have made the germans our bitches after we beat there asses in ww2. And yes im a red blooded american. hell we would have made germany our own territory...who the hell could have stopped us.
if it wasnt for us all of Europe would be speaking german
want to know who won the war within the allies? russia... german got a terrible loss trying to conquer them...
want to know who could stop you? everyone else... want to know why? because you couldn't just send troops to europe if anyone else didn't wanted...
unless... the US used some atomic bombs in europe... btw they was invented by a... german...
get a grip mate...
i gladly say that i don't have friends like you.
jumping jack for zx81 and quake (the original)
thank god it's only for you... cs sux big time... it's one of the worst fps multiplayer game i've ever played...TheCanadianTerrorist wrote:
For me, it's definitly Counter-Strike 1.3-1.6. FPS' would be nowhere without it.
that would be very nice...DeadboyUSMC wrote:
Leisure Suit Larry.
+1 for the sig...Stealth42o wrote:
Max Payne I suppose.
you guys are all wrong... i'll explain my theory...
there is no present... all that you do is part of the past... why? because time is always in motion and because of that everything, no mater how brief and close to "now" is, is never "now".
there is no future... why? because it can be altered from the slight change you make... a sneeze changes all that is going to happen because it changes the way that the sneezer is going to interact with everyone...
so it's like...
past closest past uncertain events
|-------------------------|-----------------------|
time travel? can't happen because it will change things in a way that can make everything different...
if someone from the "future" would come here and interact with anyone, he would change the whole path from there to the point where he travelled from... he might not even exist anymore...
but this is just a theory of a guy that believes that the solar system is just an atom from something huge (comparing to our size) and that in the jurassic there was an intelligent life form that wipedout almost the whole planet with an atomic war/accident...
and don't steal my wacky ideas...
there is no present... all that you do is part of the past... why? because time is always in motion and because of that everything, no mater how brief and close to "now" is, is never "now".
there is no future... why? because it can be altered from the slight change you make... a sneeze changes all that is going to happen because it changes the way that the sneezer is going to interact with everyone...
so it's like...
past closest past uncertain events
|-------------------------|-----------------------|
time travel? can't happen because it will change things in a way that can make everything different...
if someone from the "future" would come here and interact with anyone, he would change the whole path from there to the point where he travelled from... he might not even exist anymore...
but this is just a theory of a guy that believes that the solar system is just an atom from something huge (comparing to our size) and that in the jurassic there was an intelligent life form that wipedout almost the whole planet with an atomic war/accident...
and don't steal my wacky ideas...
i totally agree with you...ThomasMorgan wrote:
I always thought of snipers as a deterrant. There aren't enough snipers out there who kill with one shot as soon as you give them the chance. Instead of killing people and racking up points, snipers act almsot as an obstacle. If I know a sniper is guarding a flag but I don't know exactly where he is, I'll be a bit more hesitant to go in and cap the flag. I know there may be claymores around and he probably already knows I'm there.
Try not to think of the sniper as someone who will end the round with 50 kills and four deaths, but moreso as someone who will stay in places where others won't, often protecting your flags. Playing as a sniper is where most of my defend points come from, and I would bet it's the same for a lot of other people too.
27.36... rising it every day...
32 in december... i'll stop playing games when i'm bored or i can't play anymore...
that... i also want... actually, claymores should have a tripping wire... and they shouldn't go off unless you trip on the wire... and should take a while to deploy...Zukabazuka wrote:
Give us the power to destroy those fucking claymores and its good enough.
one question... well maybe several...SargeV1.4 wrote:
hahahahahahahahaa!!
ok sonny, first off, I doubt that you've even played BF2 pre-1.2. You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. In those good old days, claymores were destructable, and teamkilled friendlies whether you liked it or not. In those days, a sniper sniped. You are a waste of a good ghillie suit, running around spamming your invincible mines in alleyways or other places where they can hardly be avoided. You can't hit shit with guns, so you spam claymores instead to compensate. That is what makes you the lowlife of bf2, a pathetic piece of a crap that is a waste of a server slot that could otherwise be filled by a real player.
I have experienced virtually every aspect of this game, unlike you. I would never sink to your level and complain about something such as jets, nades, or c4, as they can all be avoided. You claymore spammers, however, are just there to spoil the game for all the other players on the server who came there for some good infantry action.
Do you think that you have any right to discuss this game? you are new, absolutely crap at it, and haven't got an ounce of common sense. Do you want to know why people run into your claymores on FF-on servers? because on the vast majority of servers thesedays CFF is off and there is nothing to tell you so. so when you plant your claymore in the hotel alleys on karkand people don't expect to get blown to shit by some retard and his inability to play properly.
Here's a tip: Go play another genre. You are clearly worthless at fps games, and resort to using the worst gamebreaking tactics. There are plenty of other games out there that cater to your need for 'fun'. Go play those, but don't ruin an online game because of your inabilities.
are you smart enough to see when people started playing? i know i am... you even started after me...
i miss several stuff from the start... true... but at least there are no teamkills from arti and kills don't count... how's that for a suposed after 1.2 player? you're just full of crap and start saying that others are this and that and in that way "my friend" you show who you really are...
btw unlike you... i try to see what i'm talking about... i don't drop claymores as i walk... i use them to protect me when i'm getting a flag... and if you do you homework you would see that my percentage of capture cp and time played is way bigger than yours... how's that for a
?clearly worthless at fps games, and resort to using the worst gamebreaking tactics. There are plenty of other games out there that cater to your need for 'fun'. Go play those, but don't ruin an online game because of your inabilities.
a good sniper is as good as a good medic... but hey if you can't see that... maybe you are the one misplaced here...
i played all other classes... even if it was for a while... and i still like the sniper class the most... like in MOH:SH i was a sniper... and in COD and COD:UO and in COD2... if you think that i'm useless... try to remember that when you drop on the floor with a bullet of my sniper... oh wait... you need to step down from you plane for that... damn...
about the hours i play... i just have to say one thing to you... get a life... go outside... get a girlfriend... and just for your information... project reallity doesn't count into the hours played...
i don't know what is your age and i don't really care but try to make some sense because you don't know me and you don't know what i play or don't play...
i will end my discussion here because i don't want to feed any more... what's the word we used on the early ninteens... oh yeah... trolls
i'm begining to wonder if all the karma you got was from ppl trying to hit the -1 and when they failled to do that they pressed the +1 instead...SargeV1.4 wrote:
INCAPABLE OF USING GUNS? DON'T PLAY AN FPS GAME!I.M.I Militant wrote:
so i drop a few clays with the hope of killing some enemys
and stay away.
*SargeV1.4 mode on*
get out of you plane or can't you use a gun? go play MS flight simulator if you like flying that much. and don't use grenades or C4 either...
*SargeV1.4 mode off*
it's guys like you that make BF2 an fps with so much fun... wait... i meant... that make BF2 funny.
even flyboyz complain about anything now a days...
btw... i spam those bitches... claymores... i don't play anything else anymore... and i love to see my mates running into them and punish me... shows how dumb certain people are. since for me is having fun and teamplay and not stats i really don't care about the punishes... only if i get kicked out because of them.