Poll

Should there come a European (Union) Army?

Yes.55%55% - 61
No.44%44% - 49
Total: 110
BVC
Member
+325|6732
I have a few Dutch cousins who've come over here on holiday at various times.  In each case I was told their english wasn't good before they arrived and in each case there was nothing wrong with it...hell they actually spoke better english than some locals!  Same goes for my German friends.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6618|SE London

Bell wrote:

Eu was made to allow member countries to easily buy and sell good to each other, it was never meant to be a miliatary force.  I tbh hate the EU, e.g UK puts in probably the most and gets the least out of it, phht, and it's just a bitch fight on a larger scale.  Called the triangle of power, lets not kid our self's, the Brits, Germans and French are the main players, france and germany go at the UK, while the Uk ends up suckin up to bush (by that I mean blair).

Europe is different from America, to create an army could only ever occur if europe became the one nations, something like the USE, but I dunno how that would work, I dont want some frenchy runing my country.  Nor would they want some random cockney git runing there's, as I said, it was only intended to be a markey, never a country, therefor never have it's own miliatary.
Economic powers require military forces to protect their interests. For example the army of the East India Trading company. The UK don't do quite as badly as you suggest out of the EU, in fact we benefit from it immensely, especially with our rebate (which they tried to take away at the request of the French and Germans - but Blair said we weren't going to let it be taken away, unless there was a review of all EU policy - especially the CAP - one of Blair's greatest moments if you ask me).

NATO is already essentially a long term European Coalition force and any European Army would merely replace this. I believe that is a good idea and Europe distancing themselves from America militarily would be a good idea. The fact that the Pentagon is so against the idea of a joint European armed forces makes me want it even more - not just to spite America, but they don't want to be a part of NATO out of the goodness of their hearts - they get a lot of power and influence in Europe from heading NATO.
yuckfou09
hide your terrorists ^,^
+94|6713|Ft. Drum, NY

stryyker wrote:

no. an army of different languages composed of different countries would not function properly.

besides, who are you gonna have that would be willing to fight? England? Germany? FRANCE?!?
have you guys ever heard of the french foreign legion??? The  army is composed of recruits from diff. countries. They all learn french and fight toghether. And french citizens cannot join.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6618|SE London

yuckfou09 wrote:

stryyker wrote:

no. an army of different languages composed of different countries would not function properly.

besides, who are you gonna have that would be willing to fight? England? Germany? FRANCE?!?
have you guys ever heard of the french foreign legion??? The  army is composed of recruits from diff. countries. They all learn french and fight toghether. And french citizens cannot join.
Of course the French foreign legion is composed of people who aren't French. It's the only decent armed force they have. If they were French they'd be rubbish, like the regular French army.

The Leclerc is almost as gay as the Mirage.
Sh1fty2k5
MacSwedish
+113|6746|Sweden
Nordic battlegroup: Sweden: 1100, Finland: 200, Estonia: 50 and Norway: 150

WTF, can someone else please contribute?
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6598

Bertster7 wrote:

If they were French they'd be rubbish, like the regular French army.
And you base this statement on?
.:XDR:.PureFodder
Member
+105|6866

EnemyOfAllkind wrote:

O H    M Y    G O D  ! !

You cant be serious saying that Sweden has a powerful army ??

As an argument. How about those fine Swedish fighter planes. Has one ever landed with out exploding ?? ;-)

And Yes I'm Finnish, witch explains why I just had to respond to this unbelievable claim....
The Swedish secretly installed a bomb in each Ikea table, they now just waiting for the right time to strike.

Also we have a single common European language that everyone has learnt.

Esperanto........
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6592
We should create the 'Western Europe Armed Koalition', with its offshoot the 'Southern Operations Fighting Troops'.
Rosse_modest
Member
+76|6812|Antwerp, Flanders

SwampDog wrote:

Reaxzion wrote:

stryyker wrote:

no. an army of different languages composed of different countries would not function properly.

besides, who are you gonna have that would be willing to fight? England? Germany? FRANCE?!?
An army of different languages can function properly, just look at Belgium or Switzerland.
Yeah but Switzerland are always neutral and Belgium is just crap.

I don`t really have any real justification for calling belgium crap, i went to Brussels once and it was really Boring. And they put pickled cabbage on my hot dog! I mean come on... CABBAGE.. PICKLED... ON MY HOT DOG...
Well we don't actually have an army we just have a lightly armed humanitarian aid force. And yes they put sauerkraut on hotdogs here but I have to say the practice is becoming more and more extinct since youngsters don't seem to be all that fond of it (I don't like sauerkraut either). If you ever come back here, which you won't, be sure to state specifically you do not want sauerkraut on your dog!
Brussels is the worst city in Belgium to come to, it's probably the bleakest, most boring town in continental Europe (well, except for some Ukrainian industrial town out there in the middle of nowhere). Brussels itself used to be only a very small city of little importance in the region compared to the other cities. Nowadays it's nothing but one big heap of office and diplomatic buildings (being the capital of Europe doesn't help things), and neither are meant to be exciting. Everybody hates Brussels, except for loonies and people who live and work in Brussels, perhaps.

As to the language issue: English is the most appropriate means of internal communication. Of all the languages in Europe I've been in contact with (Dutch, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Norwegian) English is BY FAR the easiest one to master sufficiently to ensure effective communication (especially if you bastardize it like the Americans did).

And leadership of such an army would not fall on one single nation, as one very intelligent individual here stated (England).
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6752

Bubbalo wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

If they were French they'd be rubbish, like the regular French army.
And you base this statement on?
do you want me to bring up the history of french wars?

rules:

always lose to muslims
wins only when america is involved.

reason that france has a forign legion:

coz french ppl suck at fighting, in fact the first thing they learn in the military is how to say surrender in 10 languages

https://www.strategypage.com/gallery/images/surrender.jpg
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6618|SE London

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

If they were French they'd be rubbish, like the regular French army.
And you base this statement on?
do you want me to bring up the history of french wars?

rules:

always lose to muslims
wins only when america is involved.

reason that france has a forign legion:

coz french ppl suck at fighting, in fact the first thing they learn in the military is how to say surrender in 10 languages
Yup, that's right
Although I have an irrational hatred of the French, probably from spending too much time in France, so my opinion on this issue might be slightly biased.

Also French military tech is crap - look at the mighty Leclerc.
Sh1fty2k5
MacSwedish
+113|6746|Sweden
ok people 1 2 3. I must admit that i enjoy making jokes about the french military, how much they suck blablabla.
But ok, funny time's over. The French army actually aren't that bad. Seriously. As a matter of fact they'd probably pwn 95% of all other armies. So, start making fun about some other countries army.  Like north korea or something. They're cool
WilhelmSissener
Banned
+557|6769|Oslo, Norway
there is one no stfu
LostFate
Same shit, Different Arsehole
+95|6521|England
I do think there should be an EU army, a force that would challange the US an stop them from pushin everyone else around.
LaidBackNinja
Pony Slaystation
+343|6745|Charlie One Alpha
About the language issue, it varies from country to country.
I have found that most of my fellow Dutchmen have at least a basic understanding of English, and the same goes for Germans. In France nobody seems to even know what English is...
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
Meiktila
Member
+3|6683|UK
Technically, there already is an EU Army of sorts (EUFOR), which is currently deployed in Bosnia and the DR of Congo.

But still, no, I hate to think of the EU's various national armies being merged into one behemoth which takes orders from Eurocrats in Brussels. I could forsee many issues about languages, equipment compatibility etc.
James-m
Member
+28|6586|England

stryyker wrote:

no. an army of different languages composed of different countries would not function properly.

besides, who are you gonna have that would be willing to fight? England? Germany? FRANCE?!?
France?? your joking right? The last major 2 world wars, look what happened. 1st world war, they got whooped like all sides, but world war 2, they build a defensive like (great work by the way france) and forget to build it along the border with belgium. Now the germans arent stupid enough to walk right into a huge defesive position are they. the french were very stupid, but im not sure what theyre like now..... do they still use flintlock muskets?
James-m
Member
+28|6586|England

Sh1fty2k5 wrote:

ok people 1 2 3. I must admit that i enjoy making jokes about the french military, how much they suck blablabla.
But ok, funny time's over. The French army actually aren't that bad. Seriously. As a matter of fact they'd probably pwn 95% of all other armies. So, start making fun about some other countries army.  Like north korea or something. They're cool
again...... your joking right? name one major war the french have actually won, and held the ground they took? please id love to hear one. Anyone ever read a book on french war heroes? i did once, but then again it doesnt take long to read the book the size of a kiddies bedtime story
<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|6738|New York
HAd to say NO, MAinly because, The UN cant even put together a peace force to goto the Border with Isreal Now, Getting an Army together that has 200 different warped views on things would be next to impossible.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6592

James-m wrote:

Sh1fty2k5 wrote:

ok people 1 2 3. I must admit that i enjoy making jokes about the french military, how much they suck blablabla.
But ok, funny time's over. The French army actually aren't that bad. Seriously. As a matter of fact they'd probably pwn 95% of all other armies. So, start making fun about some other countries army.  Like north korea or something. They're cool
again...... your joking right? name one major war the french have actually won, and held the ground they took? please id love to hear one. Anyone ever read a book on french war heroes? i did once, but then again it doesnt take long to read the book the size of a kiddies bedtime story
I see the brits no longer occupy any parts of France like they once did during the middle ages so I guess they pwned England at some point.
.:XDR:.PureFodder
Member
+105|6866

James-m wrote:

Sh1fty2k5 wrote:

ok people 1 2 3. I must admit that i enjoy making jokes about the french military, how much they suck blablabla.
But ok, funny time's over. The French army actually aren't that bad. Seriously. As a matter of fact they'd probably pwn 95% of all other armies. So, start making fun about some other countries army.  Like north korea or something. They're cool
again...... your joking right? name one major war the french have actually won, and held the ground they took? please id love to hear one. Anyone ever read a book on french war heroes? i did once, but then again it doesnt take long to read the book the size of a kiddies bedtime story
To be fair on the French, in the two world wars they had the main aggressor sat on their door step and were amongst the first major targets. If there were a land path from mainland Europe to the UK we'd have been pwned as well, probably the US as well if the Germans could have gotten there. Go back two hundred years and the French were kicking ass all over Europe. As much as mocking the French is fun it's not overly justified.
James-m
Member
+28|6586|England
fair one, i see your point, but french mocking is fun, i dont mean it offensivly, they hate us too lol.
schakl
Member
+21|6725
I would say YES, because an army fighting together is always better than fighting each other, where best would be no fighting at all.
And the problem with languages is not a real problem. Lets use english as common language and the national language for groups. English, because it is so easy to learn that even George Doubleboo was able to learn it.

Hawk
[pt] KEIOS
srs bsns
+231|6689|pimelteror.de
wtf!?! the european union has its "own army". it is organized like nato, so every country gives some capacity.... http://www.weu.int/

stupid thread/americans...

Last edited by [pt] KEIOS (2006-08-22 05:25:45)

dalexa
Member
+4|6642|portugal

Spearhead wrote:

stryyker wrote:

considering a joint space mission failed due to a metric-imperial miscalculation, the margin for error during war, especially with orders, is too great to overlook.
Mathematical problems for space-borne missions can completely fail even if they're off by .000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001.

With something as simple as translating, especially in Europe, they'd have to be pretty damn stupid to screw it up.
translating numbers... that i would like to see...
"hey... that's a zero..."
"what? not in my language!"


Spearhead wrote:

NASA f*cks up every now and then, and they're dealing with American numbers and the English language.  It's a wee bit harder than you think
i just don't get one thing... why don't they all use the f*cking metric system... it's all brits fault
man... the ESA (european space agency) speak in french, english and german... they do translate all the stuff and guess what... it works just fine... and they do calculations also...


<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

HAd to say NO, MAinly because, The UN cant even put together a peace force to goto the Border with Isreal Now, Getting an Army together that has 200 different warped views on things would be next to impossible.
uhhhh wait... i thought that there was no army there yet because the U.S. don't have any interest in it to happen...


.:XDR:.PureFodder wrote:

Go back two hundred years and the French were kicking ass all over Europe. As much as mocking the French is fun it's not overly justified.
you mean down to the napolean ages? the one that got his ass wooped while attempting to conquer portugal?  unless you ment about asterix and obelix... man... those guys rocked...

Last edited by dalexa (2006-08-22 05:53:59)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard