but the answer is : Juvenelious
Search
Search results: 6,657 found, showing up to 50
I think the point macbeth was making is that the reservation system inherently creates a kind of second class citizenship, the same way segregation did.
True dat. Foster care is a failed system
ATG, do they accept non believers into the program you just participated in?
French?
Okay I'll bite -- why do you hate orwell?
"compassionate conservative"
Union kicked your ass lol
Kinectikit
lololol richest state in the union am I right? Or is gun control legislation the overriding factor?
lololol richest state in the union am I right? Or is gun control legislation the overriding factor?
Girl asks me for my number.... I don't ask her for hers
I think I F'ed up there
I think I F'ed up there
Islam?
You should've beat him the fuck up Jay. Thats your town he's going into.... mark your god damn territory
BF2s has been a great source of :
video game referrals
BF2s wiki/BF2 topics when we were playing it
lively and mostly retarded debate every election cycle.
Its been good to me. Whether I'm at school or work, just hop on BF2s, see what they're saying, what the latest drama is, etc.
Used to be a lot better with cameronpoe and kmar and several others. I say we clear the ban list, so that bf2s dies later rather than sooner
video game referrals
BF2s wiki/BF2 topics when we were playing it
lively and mostly retarded debate every election cycle.
Its been good to me. Whether I'm at school or work, just hop on BF2s, see what they're saying, what the latest drama is, etc.
Used to be a lot better with cameronpoe and kmar and several others. I say we clear the ban list, so that bf2s dies later rather than sooner
Clear the list! Clear the list! Clear the list!!!!!!!!!
It would be the bf2s revival
It would be the bf2s revival
How many years you got left? Just curiousMacbeth wrote:
History and Political Science. Meh.
Budweiser thursdays.
You know somethings F'ed up when Mcdonalds and Walmart employees start going on strike. And their own god damn financial planner assumes you work full time and still have a second job. And leaves out money for air conditioning... and health insurance.... etc. etc.
Clear the ban list
It'd be cool seeing users who haven't been on in years coming back. The worst that could happen, as uzique said, is porn and gore. Who gives a fuck about manners, DST is basically all shit slinging these days. Who CARES.
It'd be cool seeing users who haven't been on in years coming back. The worst that could happen, as uzique said, is porn and gore. Who gives a fuck about manners, DST is basically all shit slinging these days. Who CARES.
Why must every single active thread on BF2s be derailed like this? It's not like you guys are derailing it in a good way, either -- EE chats, Trayvon Martin and now this one are about uziques drug habits. What the fuck. At least argue about something that has not been ddone literally a thousand times before. I'd rather spend my time banging my head against the wall than read all this shit.
Me too, never heard of it until now. lol. The guy comes off as very unprofessional or possible unstable. Basically using twitter to shit talk because some people said some bad things about him. Okay dude, you're probably in the wrong line of work if you can't handle people criticizing you. Every single game developer, painter, movie director, musician, etc. has been shat upon by the critics/journalists at some point in their career. But no, this guy goes off the reservation and makes a decision to cancel his life's work, his claim to fame, in a period of 1 day. LOL
Where are those riots you were predicting? Second time asking.
Oliver North, what a legend
*Makes a joke about George Washington after bf2s was talking about founding fathers*Jay wrote:
You don't know what you're talking about. It was Spearhead that brought it up.
"Must be a socialist who wants to shred the constitution! Quick, lemme go on wikipedia and link stuff that we all learned in 8th grade history"
You can make nuanced criticism of past political figures and still recognize the value and significance of their accomplishments. I said it just 2 pages ago, the fact the founding fathers were also slave owners is one of most fascinating paradoxes of American history. Nowhere did I say the founding fathers were all baby eating savages. The constitution is not meaningless, but it is for these reasons that it should be taken with a grain of salt. That is all we are saying.
I'm not sure I agree with this analysis. For a couple of reasons. Young people are not historically a super powerful demographic when it comes to elections. FDR was elected in 1932. At the very youngest, you'd have to have been born in 1911 in order to have voted. You'd be over 100 years old today. So unless people in their 20's were somehow singlehandedly deciding elections in the 1930's, and they on average lived to be more than 90* years old, your argument falls apart.Jay wrote:
I can't find any definitive research for you, no. I found one article that said that people tended to become more liberal as they aged, but that it had more to do with race relations than anything else, so that's kind of a wash.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
@jay: Do you have the numbers to back that up or are you saying it because it sounds right to you? Also...Republicans staying away from social engineering and not dicking around in the economy?
...
Look at it this way though, todays retirees voted for FDR and Truman and JFK and LBJ and Carter and yet they turned out in massive numbers for Bush.
I mean, I see where you're going with this to a certain extent, but unless you've personally researched the election data it's kind of pointless to ascribe entire demographics to one candidate or the other. They elected Carter, but someone else chose Reagan? Show us. Greatest Generation =/= baby boomers, which I think is the group you're looking for here.
lol. I love how you say this with some kind of smug satisfaction, as it if it news to us that the evangelical movement is some kind of eye opening surprise. As if we are intellectually shallow 12 year olds who spend our time on r/atheism. Jay, this might come as quite a shock, but did you know the GOP was originally a northern party, and the democrat was based in the south? No shit, of course you already knew that, because I don't think you're a fucking high school drop out. If you're going to bother typing such long responses, you could at the very least avoid treating people you disagree with like trash.Jay wrote:
Oh, and for even more perspective, the people who were preaching abolition were evangelical Christians, the type that go on crusades constantly. The type you personally bitch about and wouldn't listen to a word they said.
So, NO SHIT the evangelical movement existed in the 19th century. DUR, thanks for that, such an eye opener. So by your fucking twisted logic, 21st century right wing, rural, conservative, southern movement = 19th century urban, northern, intellectual radicals. The fact that you make this claim either means you are the intellectual troll of the century, or you are just talking out of your ass. "Hey, did you know people were more religious back in the day? Wouldn't want to be like the christian right, would you?" Yes, we know those atheists in the south were such enlightened humanists. LOL
News flash Jay -- if anyone today is closest to the Confederate south, it is the evangelical christian right, based in the south with a strong southern base and a strong southern system of propaganda -- the very same systems which kept the confederacy and slavery in place. Please, explain to us, how slavery continued to exist if all these southern Christians were so outspoken against slavery. Oh, that's right, they weren't. They actually used it justify it. Go read a fuckin book.
I'd say our country has changed dramatically since 1929. In some ways more than others, of course. I see where you are coming from -- but the same could be said for any other historical atrocity. Every time people are faced with an immoral system of oppression and injustice, standing up against the status quo results in death, not just poverty. This is basically where the moral teachings of Jesus Christ come into play (no, I'm not religious). I don't think you can argue that these assaults on human dignity can be excused just by saying "it was a different time". Perhaps in the stone age, where killing the nearest tribe was more often than not a legitimate act of self-defense. But in a society of laws, especially when the rights of the individual are front and center? No. By ignoring the people that stood up and fought against these systems, and paid with their lives, you are subscribing to the mindset that allowed these systems to develop in the first place.
The fact that the Founding Fathers were also slave owners and signed a deal with the devil and allowed slavery to continue in the south when writing the constitution is one of the most fascinating political events of that day and age. We can see how, no matter how hard the country tried to ignore the issue of slavery for many decades, it eventually came back with a vengeance. It's not something we should just write off as primitive. It led directly to where we are now.
The fact that the Founding Fathers were also slave owners and signed a deal with the devil and allowed slavery to continue in the south when writing the constitution is one of the most fascinating political events of that day and age. We can see how, no matter how hard the country tried to ignore the issue of slavery for many decades, it eventually came back with a vengeance. It's not something we should just write off as primitive. It led directly to where we are now.
So where is the line drawn? At some point you have to say "okay, these people should have known better, especially when there were other people calling them out on their shit"Jay wrote:
Different times. You can't retroactively turn someone into a monster based on present morals.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
gotta love those slave owning men of character.Jay wrote:
Because when his father asked him about the chopped down tree he said 'I can not tell a lie, I did it'. Total myth passed down by the Charlie Brown cartoons, but it's supposed to show him as a man of character.
"i cannot lie! but i can keep thousands in lifelong slavery working to make me rich, whilst being paid nothing. i am a good man!"
-slavery
-nazis
-etc.
It's basically a way for mothers to get their kids to fess up to something after they've done something bad.
"Now Jimmy, what do you think George Washington would do in this situation? You want to be like George Washington, don't you, Jimmy?"
"Now Jimmy, what do you think George Washington would do in this situation? You want to be like George Washington, don't you, Jimmy?"
Do the Brits know what we are told about George Washington in kindergarten? About the cherry tree? LOL
Could still be better than 3 though. With 64 players on all platforms they'll no longer have to design two games in one. No more poorly balanced empty wastelands on the console versions, allowing them to spend more time balancing maps etc. It'd be pretty hard for them to go backwards after BF3's lackluster results.
For New York, they will naturally leave out the smell of piss and garbageJay wrote:
That might be cool. I hate tourists.
Also, many musicians and comedians nowadays rely on live-performance for revenue. There was a pianist or something who stood up and started yelling at someone for filming them fairly recently.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
because it's anti-social and obnoxious. it normally spoils other people's view - those stood behind, normally. it's also a total disengagement and a kind of disrespect to the artist or performer that is putting on a show for you. many bands and dj's now politely request no photos.
Also, Zimmerman isn't Mexican... he's half Peruvian or something. Kind of a big difference.
Also, medium... where are those riots you were talking about earlier? Hmm?
Also, medium... where are those riots you were talking about earlier? Hmm?
It sounds like the program is literally impossible to implement, or would be so ineffective as to be completely irrelevant. It's just surprising that your current government has the balls to even try it. Not to mention China would have a direct pipeline into every single home in the UK. lol.... it's almost comical.
Why spend money on a vacation when you can just go to wikipedia and see any location in the world? /sarcasm
Whats creepy is that in the next 20 or 30 years they'll probably have interactive video games for tourists. Download it and walk around a photo-realistic 3d representation of a famous landmark, like a documentary style Bioshock game or something. Perhaps they will even have smells and touch and temperature made possible by augmented reality suits. All in the comfort of your living room.
Whats creepy is that in the next 20 or 30 years they'll probably have interactive video games for tourists. Download it and walk around a photo-realistic 3d representation of a famous landmark, like a documentary style Bioshock game or something. Perhaps they will even have smells and touch and temperature made possible by augmented reality suits. All in the comfort of your living room.
http://boingboing.net/2013/07/26/uk-cen … block.html
Web forums are on the list along with pornography! LOL. Also you are using a Chinese company with roots to the PLA which the US has deemed a threat to national security to implement this censorship. /UK fail
Web forums are on the list along with pornography! LOL. Also you are using a Chinese company with roots to the PLA which the US has deemed a threat to national security to implement this censorship. /UK fail
Cold water in the mountains with trees all around > muggy 80 degree water with tacky 70's era buildings built as far as the eye can see
I like burnzz's photos. Don't know why you guys are making such a big deal out of it. It's nice having a semi-real connection to the photographer taking them, allows you to ask questions about the locations and what not as opposed to looking at anonymous google images landscapes.
Burnz don't listen to the hate
Burnz don't listen to the hate
On behalf of America, I am so sorry for this shit.
It's what you might characterize as the end of western civilization. Ever seen honey boo boo? If not, then stay away from it.
It's what you might characterize as the end of western civilization. Ever seen honey boo boo? If not, then stay away from it.
Saturday morning drama on bf2s
You're an idiot dilbert. You realize that jurys require unanimous decisions, right? A hung jury would've been an absolute disaster. The same probably happens for 80 percent of criminal trials.
Are we still doing agnostic vs. atheism or are we back to macs asian tranny collection?
What the hell, I post it anyway
I never liked Hitchens. Always came across as emotionally unstable to be honest.
What the hell, I post it anyway
I never liked Hitchens. Always came across as emotionally unstable to be honest.
Two things :Extra Medium wrote:
Wrong. He was absolutely correct in what he did. He may have been wrong for getting out of the car, but he was 100% correct in shooting Martin. Unfortunately for you guys, getting out of the car wasn't a crime and any criminal intent he may have had by getting out he wasn't tried on. Blame the prosecutors for being shit at their job.
1. You're wrong. You have no way of knowing he was 100 percent correct in shooting Martin. He could have been approaching Martin, brandishing his gun. At that point, he would have been asking for his head to be slammed into the concrete. I love the fact that you said this, it shows half the stuff you posted in this thread is bullshit. Zimmermans entire defense is predicated on the fact that we don't know, and never will know, exactly how it went down -- and here you are, coming back with this shit. Why weren't you saying this 100 percent stuff one month ago? Oh shit, because you would have been wrong and looked like the moron you really are.
2. Fuck off with this "unfortunately for you guys" shit. You were the one who was gleefully jumping up and down with a hard one anticipating a not guilty verdict. The rest of us? "Huh, that's weird" A 29 year old armed neighborhood watch kills an unarmed 17 year old. "These fuckers get away". No one has addressed the FACTS OF THE CASE. They always go to "uh drugs" or "he was a murderous violent nigger, look at his twitter" or "HAHAHA look at his NIGGER GIRLFRIEND!"
If the same had happened to your kid, you'd be starting a violent revolution at this point.
Yep, it's all just one giant media conspiracy. "The blacks" would have just ignored it like the good little docile people they are if Al Sharpton hadn't come along and ruined everything.
We should have mandatory fat camp -- call it the FFF. Fat fuckers Fasting. Along with the SSCC -- Soda Size Compliance Commission
I almost fell asleep watching that. Was waiting for 1942 and Murica comes in and is like BAM
LOLShahter wrote:
i already explained that - one group of cretins got beaten up by another group of cretins.
Funny because you were the one who turned the gay rights thread into something personal because it makes your country look bad. Meanwhile 99 percent of the rest of these forums we consistently complain about our own countries. As in, actually have spirited discussions. And mac calls you out on one thing and you lose your shit. It's pathetic.you are an american equivalent of a brainwashed fucking idiot. i don't really care when you say anything - you are, like most of the members of these forums - an interested specimen: an english speaking piece of shit i could poke to get some response.
The commercialized media, sure. There are plenty of non-commercialized, non-propaganda based news outlets in the US though. Cable news has been dying a slow death for a while now.
Viagra, trips to Europe, sports cars, etc.
It's ironic because a lot of Americans go to RT these days for information that is outside the American-media-propaganda complex. RT has a very large American audience. Wonder how many Russians listen to NPR or watch PBS? lolUzique The Lesser wrote:
lol i remember specifically linking him a proper peer-reviewed journal article written by an academic that had spent about 5 years of her life living in russia, studying its history very fairly and objectively. but then he'll say i "read the western media". the only western paper i read is the guardian, dude. i don't really read 'news' much. and the guardian very seldom mentions russia in any of its articles.
He can't explain the pictures of neo-nazi's frothing at the mouth and bloody gay people getting loaded into police vans. He's the Russian equivalent of an right-wing Republican. When I see him say "western propaganda", I see Republicans saying "muslims"
No, not at all, I've been raised from birth to be a far left/socialist and member of the Democratic party. I just wanted to illustrate the fact that while Obama is a shit president, it does not mean the other side is better. They are, in fact, much worse imo.Dilbert_X wrote:
Its taken you this long to realise?
Every time they get in they increase spending and expand the power of government.