This is the kind of attitude that's pleasant to see. Instead of screaming and crying like a little bitch with a skinned knee, some players simply understand that altering tactics is going to be a necessary evil. Good to see some people get it...it'll separate the men from the boys, for sure.General_CoLin_Tassi wrote:
I agree mate. New tactics maybe needed as in take out the AA first. Heli's have flares. Fly in, drop flares and gun that AA mofo. Or maybe TV.
Search
Search results: 239 found, showing up to 50
Holy shit, squirt me some tears!! Shall we call you a WAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHMBULANCE?nobodyhasthisnameyet wrote:
theyre not dicks, theyre ASSHOLES, and they deserve to be fucked by all the rest of the dicks in this game.
go right ahead, have fun with your pathetic little pussy game. GO RIGHT AHEAD
haha, this is awesome. Just like I said...the good players will simply improvise, adapt, and overcome while the mental midgets and statwhores will pitch their whiny little fits and run off to pout. It's playing out just like I figured it would.
OMFG I AM GOING TO QUIT U GUYS R NOOBS OMFG WTF LOLLERSKATES!!11!1
Original voices.
English VO only makes it impossible to use the voices to tell if someone is near you (Spotting things, dropping medpacks/ammo bags, etc.) because everyone's using the same language.
If you're USMC and you hear Arabic over your speakers, that tells you to watch out, an enemy is nearby.
English VO only makes it impossible to use the voices to tell if someone is near you (Spotting things, dropping medpacks/ammo bags, etc.) because everyone's using the same language.
If you're USMC and you hear Arabic over your speakers, that tells you to watch out, an enemy is nearby.
My head asplode=SA=VaSSiLi wrote:
You comenting on him bumping posts with spelling lessons? Or me bumping this post to comment on you commenting about him bumping posts with spelling lessons.. Or him for bumping pointless posts with spelling lessons...? or Pointless posts?
Hmmm, what's worse? Pointless posts or you bumping pointless posts with spelling lessons?polarbearz wrote:
And its 'Finally, Someone New'
Go back to school.
Go play CS, then.armin wrote:
Explain to me why Valve doens't charge for the new CS maps?
Because they help the CS community
Nobody's forcing you to purchase anything else to play the game. EA/DICE is still providing patches free of charge. Quit your bitching.
Let us know how your little crusade works out for ya.armin wrote:
YES IT MATTERS! we're sending out a message that we won't take their sh*t. that we don't wanna pay for content that was always for free!krazed wrote:
a petition wont do anything, theyre still going to make a mountain of money off of this... if they lose 10 or 20 sales it doesnt really matter to them
Was friendly fire off on this server?AdamEcks wrote:
Before you prejudge thinking this is another moron saying something like "I got hit with a TV like 3 time sin a row and I've never hit anyone with it... CHEAT", I'm not, just read. Now I didn't bother writing down the guys name or the server cause I'm not here to bitch, I just wanted to share what I seen. I was playing a Karkand map not too long ago running around the side (far left side of the map when in the map view). Heading towards the US spawn point (the one closest to the city on the left) i see a UFO! No joke, something was flying through the air and I had no idea what it was. Next thing I knew a parachute opened up and down floated a guy onto a building with no ladders attached. The building he landed on was the first building on your right as you head out of the US base i mentioned earlier. Its the same building that has the sand bags and busted up car in front of it. I really enjoyed how a guy parachuted down on to one of the bigger buildings in Karkand. This was quite the advantageous position for him. Unfortunately for him I seen him do it and quickly made short work of him.
Has anyone seen this happen before? It's obviosuly some sort of exploit.
Let me see if I'm understanding this correctly:
EA is still providing patches to BF2 free of charge, yet charging for expansion packs and booster packs.
What's the problem?
EA is still providing patches to BF2 free of charge, yet charging for expansion packs and booster packs.
What's the problem?
o-kay....
Possibly so. Having never played with him, I can't say. I just thought it was funny (not to mention hypocritical) that someone that had done what he had supposedly did was complaining about "fucking fucktards".DUFFKING wrote:
I'm sure it was a different person. I played uppercase crimson in a few rounds on [PTG] and he was a nice guy.
If it was his "ex-clan-member" that used his account to act like a jackass, then if I were him I'd be having a come-to-Jesus meeting with the guy. I wish that thread hadn't been deleted...at least he could apologize to the poster that complained about it.
Understood, but in the screenshots that were posted, the player used a zero, just like you.CRIMS0N_W0LF wrote:
[My name contains 0, ZERO not o >_> don't accuse me of something I didn't do :'(
The player nickname "crimson_wolf" doesn't have enough stats to be queried. The player in the screenshots was a First Sergeant, just like you. Someone even commented on why you would do something like that as a 1st Sgt., and risk getting a reset with such good stats.
If it wasn't you, but your "ex-clan-member", that's one thing....but it *was* someone playing on your account that did it, I assure you.
Funny...the person in the screenshots that were posted used your exact name in the game. However, for some reason, the thread that was posted seems to have been deleted...looks like you're lucky on that account.CRIMS0N_W0LF wrote:
No it wasn't me I don't know what you talking about. Who is the other forum member?
No biggie, though...others remember it, and the member that posted it is here pretty regularly. I'm sure he'll still have the screenshots of it. We'll just wait and see who else remembers the thread, and see if that person sees this thread so you two can discuss it "face-to-face", so to speak.
Damn shame how shit gets deleted around here... =/
That ain't what I'm talking about.CRIMS0N_W0LF wrote:
I got 905 tks. Most of them are from fools who step on mines/claymores/hump c4/think grenades are candy.
The only intentional tk i do is to defend myself from some team killing freak or when I see a confirmed hacker.
Don't tell me hackers don't exsists are I posted on forums I know about hacks a lot but i don't use them.
there are hacks that give you x5 health and last time i tked was due to that. they guy took 7 M95 hits in his body to die. 100% hits because I saw him twitch and dust came out. No medics no health packs he was just standing there shooting people and i was to his left.
My intental TKs are against retards or hackers too.
Aren't you the same guy that recently intentionally switched teams in order to grief another forum member here by teamkilling him over and over and over and over and over again over the course of a round, on Karkand, I believe? It's a simple yes or no question.
That was you, wasn't it?
You're the same guy that intentionally switched teams and followed around someone teamkilling them for an entire round...aren't you?
And the same red/blue bug.*ToRRo*cT| wrote:
BF3 with a totally a new engine....
Luckily, they can still play the game without them.Esker wrote:
Not every teenager has parents that want to use their credit card on the internet, have one or are willing to buy a booster pack so their kid can play that damn game more.
You know why they can do this and get away with it? There's one sole reason they can charge like this for all their new content...Stats. Yep, everyone complaining about EA's angle here is proudly displaying the tool that EA is using to push it...the stats and ranking systems.
You can only get ranks, awards and unlocks on ranked servers, which can only run official EA stuff, right? Therefore, if you want to keep accruing global score toward ranks and get unlocks and awards, you gotta pay them for the official stuff. Your call, everyone. They can easily see how important stats are to everyone simply by visiting BF2 forums. They know that you won't use freely-available mods and WILL buy their "booster packs" because you're all so worried about stats.
There's mods out there...mods that have new vehicles, weapons, and maps. But they don't let you obtain the apparently all-important stats.
IMO, the main thing left out of these patches and "packs" are new gametypes. Conquest is getting really old really fast.
You can only get ranks, awards and unlocks on ranked servers, which can only run official EA stuff, right? Therefore, if you want to keep accruing global score toward ranks and get unlocks and awards, you gotta pay them for the official stuff. Your call, everyone. They can easily see how important stats are to everyone simply by visiting BF2 forums. They know that you won't use freely-available mods and WILL buy their "booster packs" because you're all so worried about stats.
There's mods out there...mods that have new vehicles, weapons, and maps. But they don't let you obtain the apparently all-important stats.
IMO, the main thing left out of these patches and "packs" are new gametypes. Conquest is getting really old really fast.
Wow, you are quite a pathetic little child. How difficult it is it to mind your own business? Or are you hell-bent on starting a flamewar?Aegis wrote:
Ah, still waiting for that answer. While you're waiting, I hear that a double-ender has more uses for people like you! Occupy yourself with that.
Nice projection, BTW. You know what psychiatrists say about people that insinuate others are homosexual when sexual preference isn't even remotely part of the discussion, don't you?
*yawns*
Well, my work here is done. I've not only exposed stryyker for the toothless internet bad-ass that he is, but in the process, managed to get a nosy little prick like Aegis to reveal himself as a closet homosexual that enjoys double-ended dildos and sticking his nose in conversations that don't concern him.
Two for one...kick ass.
Don't drop the soap around Aegis, boys...
*sigh*Blankwindow wrote:
IN the build that that video is from infantry could mark targets with lazer for lazer guided bombs. Dice changed this to the lazer controled from the plane because they thought it to like calling in artilery from earlier games or something i can't remember their exact reason.
How much cooler could it have been for a ground troop to stand off from armor, mark it with a GLID, and have aircraft nail it with a laser-guided missile? Couple that with a "Request Air Support" radio request, and we're gettin' somewhere.
That would have frickin' awesome. Much better than what they came up with, IMO.
I'm sorry, perhaps you didn't get the point. I'll try to be more clear.Aegis wrote:
No really, grow a brain, think about it, and draw your own conclusions.
I asked him, not you. If I want to hear what you would do, I'll ask you. Now, run along and mind your own business. I want to hear what the tough guy has to say. I don't recall asking you anything.
Thanks, and do have a great Christmas.
Thanks, Captain Obvious...now let's all play the quiet game and hear what he has to say about the question I asked him.Aegis wrote:
Obviously something illegal, smart oneRKF77 wrote:
Why?stryyker wrote:
i wish you had to post an address with your registering info for the game, then there would be unlimited and unstoppable hell to pay
What exactly would you do with such information?
Why?stryyker wrote:
i wish you had to post an address with your registering info for the game, then there would be unlimited and unstoppable hell to pay
What exactly would you do with such information?
You know what, Krappy, go fuck yourself. You're not worth the effort.
Keep jerking yourself off in front of everyone, I know people with fragile egos need to be right all the time. I'll let you bask in your glory now.
I was about to admit an incorrect statement in the effort to get the debate back on track, but I learned a long time ago that it's simply not worth my time to be civil with people who are incapable of acting like adults.
Go play in traffic.
Keep jerking yourself off in front of everyone, I know people with fragile egos need to be right all the time. I'll let you bask in your glory now.
I was about to admit an incorrect statement in the effort to get the debate back on track, but I learned a long time ago that it's simply not worth my time to be civil with people who are incapable of acting like adults.
Go play in traffic.
Nope, I'm gonna go my separate way. We're not going to see eye-to-eye on the matter, so there's no point in continuing.Krappyappy wrote:
until you can find a way to discredit my videos, i have no need to respond to anything you have to say on this matter. bottom line is you said you could survive a GL shot to the foot while jumping. i have evidence to the contrary. it's your responsibility to explain my evidence.
As far as I'm concerned, my screenshots prove the overall point at hand, and that's that there is a problem with the grenade launchers in their current iteration. In a gameplay situation, they can be exploited. That's the big deal here, right? Gameplay?
No biggie. I wish you could have been more civil about it, but I guess that's too much to ask around here.
That is precisely the response I was expecting from you. Instead of recognizing the issue at hand, you'd rather accuse me of shenanigans.Krappyappy wrote:
[color=aqua] pure garbage. you do not show the beginning of your jump. we have no way of knowing whether you jumped from the ground or jumped off the roof. you might be able to fool the average person but you can't fool someone trained to spot errors in experiments.
i have video proving me right. video > pictures.
How simple.
I won't bother continuing with you. You're obviously incapable of seeing that there is a problem with it, so we'll just have to agree to disagree and go our separate ways.
I was firing it as far down as I could fire it, based on the location of the person I was trying to hit with it. I was simulating perfectly the situation that raises the arguments about the grenade launchers WHILE IN THE GAME. What I illustrated is the problem of "noob-toobing", as they occur in a gameplay situation.Nyte wrote:
You are firing at an angle and not straight down. Krappy was demonstrating it STRAIGHT down, YOU are demonstrating it at a 235 degree angle (with respect to the 4 quadrants in trigonometry).
Ok? Bye.
Ok? Suck it, Trebek. Nobody squeezed your head, junior.
Interesting that such an educated person would choose to be a jerk rather than debate logically. Oh well, c'est la vie.Krappyappy wrote:
i'm not going to continue in a civilised manner when people start spewing things that aren't true. i work as a statistical psychologist, and as a scientist, i do not tolerate people who don't find things out for themselves rather than accepting whatever other people say as truth.
No need. I've got the screenshots to prove my testing, as you can now see.Krappyappy wrote:
since you can't be bothered to test things for yourself, i have done it for you.
Funny, but my in-game experience (as evidenced by my screenshots) tell a different story.Krappyappy wrote:
all shots were done with full health. as you can see, only the elevated situation allows the shooter to live, and with significant damage. now if you had used the GL in game, you would already know this.
I have plenty of experience with it, having played ~260 hours in this game, and I have just disproved your theory that the "jumping to survive a grenade-launcher blast" is a myth. It's right there in 800x600 full color for you to see.Krappyappy wrote:
why would people spread lies and rumors like this? they must either be doing it deliberately, or have no experience with it. i will assume that you're not some scheming loser who deliberately goes online and tells odious lies. if you have no experience using the GL but say it takes no skill to use it, then nothing you say has any validity, period.
Funny, I was going to say it takes more skill to use the rifle in "noob-toob" situations, but meh, whatever.Krappyappy wrote:
it takes more skill to use a weapon which can kill yourself than one which can't.
I was going to wait for you to stick your foot in your mouth, krappy, but I'll save you the embarrassment.
Single player, 16-player Karkand map, battlerecorder running...RELEASE THE HOUNDS!!!
______________________________________________________
Here's the poor sniper I'm about to t00b.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/913/screen0226qo.jpg
Here he is again...poor, unsuspecting bastard.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/7637 … 0238mi.jpg
Look at my hops! MAD AIR! See the grenade? See where I am?
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/7717 … 0244go.jpg
Another angle for your viewing enjoyment.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/5964 … 0257pj.jpg
Barrel almost straight down...one dead sniper...one living noob-toober.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/7585 … 0262fo.jpg
Here's me, landing in the explosion's mark, reloading, while he's still airborne. In case you're confused, that's me, alive on the left, and him, dead on the right.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/1488 … 0273ws.jpg
Another angle, for your myth-busting enjoyment.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/4273 … 0284wo.jpg
My trust medic, healing my 8 bars' worth of damage so I can run off to toob again! I can't be sure how much damage the toob itself did me, since the sniper shot me twice as I ran up to him.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/7610 … 0299en.jpg
You were saying something about a "myth"? Something about the grenade's explosion being bigger than a jump? Care to clarify?
Single player, 16-player Karkand map, battlerecorder running...RELEASE THE HOUNDS!!!
______________________________________________________
Here's the poor sniper I'm about to t00b.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/913/screen0226qo.jpg
Here he is again...poor, unsuspecting bastard.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/7637 … 0238mi.jpg
Look at my hops! MAD AIR! See the grenade? See where I am?
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/7717 … 0244go.jpg
Another angle for your viewing enjoyment.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/5964 … 0257pj.jpg
Barrel almost straight down...one dead sniper...one living noob-toober.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/7585 … 0262fo.jpg
Here's me, landing in the explosion's mark, reloading, while he's still airborne. In case you're confused, that's me, alive on the left, and him, dead on the right.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/1488 … 0273ws.jpg
Another angle, for your myth-busting enjoyment.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/4273 … 0284wo.jpg
My trust medic, healing my 8 bars' worth of damage so I can run off to toob again! I can't be sure how much damage the toob itself did me, since the sniper shot me twice as I ran up to him.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/7610 … 0299en.jpg
You were saying something about a "myth"? Something about the grenade's explosion being bigger than a jump? Care to clarify?
Actually, I have tested it, and I see it every night I play Karkand, ad nausuem. Anyone who disputes it either hasn't played the game, or is just whining about the possibility of their favorite exploit being taken away. Which one are you?Krappyappy wrote:
this is exactly the sort of ignorant moaning that causes me to discredit all complaints about the GLs completely. it is impossible to fire the GL straight down and live, whether you jump or not. anyone who says otherwise has obviously not actually tested it himself.
This is a shame. You did so well for a while in having a civilized discussion without resorting to the favored argument of immature gamers everywhere. Nice job in completely invalidating everything you've said by going to the "you must suck" argument.Krappyappy wrote:
this further makes me believe that the only reason people complain about the GLs is the fact that they suck and can't deal with being killed by it.
PLEASE, tell me what would be SO HORRIBLE about implmenting a minimum distance-to-arm fuse. Explain to me how that would detract from gameplay...how will it ruin anything? What would be SO BAD about not being able to use the grenade launchers from 3 meters away? You've started with the insults, but you're sidestepping that argument for some unknown reason. Say DICE makes the grenade launchers so they're exactly as they are now, with the exception of a 20-meter distance to arm fuse. This is all I'm arguing for...what would be SO horrible about that?
Except you don't...the only way to kill yourself with the grenade launcher is to fire it directly on the tops of your boots and not jump at the same time. We've all seen how it works...a no-talent hack running around with the -203 armed and ready turns a corner, you get off a round or two, he fires it at the ground...you die, he runs off reloading.RedFiercare wrote:
If that was the case, you would die if you shot the tube at the ground.
The fix that makes the most sense is a minimum distance-to-arm fuse. There's absolutely no good argument against that sort of implementation. a 20-meter arming fuse would eliminate all complaints about noob-toobing. It's as simple as that. That makes the weapon effective at medium-to-long ranges against infantry, effective against light vehicles, but removes the exploit.
This is when I wish DICE was like Red Storm was with Rainbow Six and Rogue Spear. The development team would listen to us and converse with us on their forums, telling us what was possible and what wasn't, and why. I would LOVE to hear a DICE developer's stance on this sort of fix for the grenade launchers.
It's not an insult. It's an observation.Revelstoke wrote:
y do you guys always insult people who complain in the complaining section??
ITS THE PURPOSE!!!
It's not funny to you that a jackass is taking the time to complain about a jackass? It's pretty fuckin' funny to me.
No, I meant literally. As mort4u stated, if you jump as you fire it, you can fire it straight down and kill whoever's in front of you, but not yourself. Even without jumping, you can fire it a couple meters in front of you and get the kill and live, too.Krappyappy wrote:
uh, i hope by 'literally' you meant 'not literally' because firing a GL at your feet is a sure way to kill yourself.RKF77 wrote:
The main argument I see here is, overwhelmingly, that you can literally fire it at your feet in CQB and get the kill, then run off to do it again.
As I said, it's just silly, and there's no good reason why it should be fixed. The grenade launcher is the *perfect* example of something that's broken that needs to be fixed...players that use it as it's meant to be used won't notice a thing. Players that are exploiting its piss-poor modeling will simply not be able to exploit it anymore.
I agree with you to some extent that realism should take a back seat to gameplay, but the grenade launchers are one of those things where making it more realistic also improves gameplay.
This thread is funny.
A jackass complaining about a jackass.
It's rather comical.
A jackass complaining about a jackass.
It's rather comical.
That's not the main argument I see here, or anywhere else.Krappyappy wrote:
you wouldn't think so, from all the bitching and moaning that goes on in these forums about 'noob tubers who blow themselves and their opponent up at the same time.'RKF77 wrote:
That possibility is negligible at best, thanks to the piss-poor coding. There's no good reason to not fix that. It's just silly.Krappyappy wrote:
possibility of self-damage
The main argument I see here is, overwhelmingly, that you can literally fire it at your feet in CQB and get the kill, then run off to do it again. If you fire it anywhere inside a 10 meter radius, you should die too, or at least be seriously injured. That's not a realism argument, that's simply common sense. It's a freaking grenade, not a water balloon.
That possibility is negligible at best, thanks to the piss-poor coding. There's no good reason to not fix that. It's just silly.Krappyappy wrote:
possibility of self-damage
Another good tip is, fire that grenade launcher at ANYTHING that is smoking. Ya never know when it's going to be YOUR grenade that finishes off that full BlackhawkWormGuts wrote:
i've had some sucess using my GL against blackhawks, humvees, vodnicks. realize your limitations. you can't harm the vehicle much, but there are open areas in all these vehicles. you put two rounds into a blackhawk and its coming down, because its crew is going to be dead. you can't kill the driver of the vodnik, but you can take out his passengers by putting one into the rear of the vehicle. of corse the trick is not getting yourself shot while trying this.
Of course Medic's easy...to rack up points. It's the only class in the game where you can score four ways (kills, flag work, healing, and reviving)
DICE may have intended it to be an anti-vehicle weapon (God knows why, that's insanely stupid), but in reality, it's an anti-infantry weapon.Krappyappy wrote:
from the DICE interview at totalbf2.comok, so the GL was intended to be an anti-vehicle weapon? am i the only one who thinks this makes no sense? the GL does negligible damage to armored vehicles, and has very little chance of hitting aircraft. if you were going to be fighting against vehicles, why would you pick assault over AT?armando wrote:
"The grenade launcher was designed to give the assault soldier increased ability to fight against vehicles; however it is ever increasingly being used against infantry. We didn’t want to lose this ability, but it is necessary to limit its usefulness against the infantry."
i smell someone talking out of their ass.
It just boggles the brain that DICE could fix the grenade launchers and practically end all complaints about "noob toobing" in one fell swoop simply by adding a minimum distance-to-arm fuse, or minimum time-to-arm, unless that's beyond their coding abilities. It kills me to think that instead of FIXING it, they're possibly just going to fuck it up more because some no-talent hacks fire it at their feet to get cheap kills because they can't hit shit with the rifle.
Oh well...like I've said, I'll reserve judgement until I actually see what what they do to it.
hahaha....ooooopsT3CHHGod wrote:
P.S. nice statpadding to get ur badges lolol
http://bf2s.com/player/KillerAFET/
wonder why ur other account is ur most kill victim noob..
So if you're not worried about it, why act like you are by posting about it?T3CHHGod wrote:
lol
WORST case senario
ok lets say i bunny hop
do u people really think that ur infantile .. "ohh ur scared now because u cant bunny hop and need to learn to play", will actually phase me
i read this shit and laugh at whoevers immature enough to post something like that
Ah, but a lot of them are "exploits".Krappyappy wrote:
the problem is that these supposed imbalances and exploits aren't really that, they're just the things that the good players have learned to use to great effect.
Noob toobing is an exploit of the poorly modeled splash damage.
Dolphin-diving is an exploit of a piss-poor movement model.
Accurate shooting while jumping is another exploit of a poor movement model.
I won't go so far as to say C4 chucking is an exploit...it's just quick reflexes. It's not tough at all to do, it just takes minimal practice. Unfortunately, that gets covered by no-shooting-while-jumping...so much for that. Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
It's a pain in the ass in-game, though.
Well, IMO some of those problems are real, but I won't argue there are bugs that need to be fixed, deferring to your list. Those are four problems that should have been addressed a loooooong time ago.Krappyappy wrote:
so as a result of all the bitching and moaning, DICE has devoted their attention to these phantom problems instead of focusing on what's really imporant - debugging the game.
Yeah, absolutely I think it could...however, more than new maps, I think we could stand to see a couple new gametypes. Conquest just gets old after awhile.Krappyappy wrote:
besides which, the game can stand to have a few more maps, wouldn't you agree? and don't say anything about SF, that's a trashy money grab which doesn't deserve to be mentioned.
I respectfully disagree. From removing dolphin diving and the ability to bounce around and shoot accurately, tweaking weapon balances a bit, and (hopefully) improving AA a bit, I think this patch will be a good one. I don't agree with everything they want to implement, but c'est la vie.Krappyappy wrote:
but instead of doing what's really important, DICE is tweaking balance where it doesn't need to be tweaked.
We both agree good players will adapt. That's why I fail to see a problem...people can still hop around as a defensive movement, they just can't shoot accurately while doing it. IMHO, that's not too much to ask.
However, I agree about the problems with the game. I do hope that in addition to what they're adding, they plan to fix what's busted. I haven't been able to use the server browser for months...I have to get server IPs from friends on separate comms. It's a pain in the ass.
I ain't know...I'm going to reserve judgement until I see what they do. Remember who we're talking about here....they can SAY they're going to do all these things, whether they actually DO it is a different story entirely *coughAAcough*
Some of them are fine...the ones where the pic is inlaid into a small stats signature ain't TOO bad. But still...if I want softcore porn, I'll go watch Cinemax after midnight. People who browse from work or school may not want softcore popping up on their screen when they aren't expecting it...and who in their right mind would expect it at a BF2 forum?TriggerHappy998 wrote:
Then again I've been hearing a lot of people getting tired of seeing those softcore porn sigs from Hypernia, so I'm about 50-50 on that.
The biggest problem comes when people stack multiple 640x480 pics of random half-naked chicks one on top of the other, taking up an entire screen for a one-line post. Some of the sigs, softcore porn or not, are borderline ridiculous because they eat up 800+ pixels of space. Some people are just using enormous pics as their sigs...it's just silly.
Shit like this? W T F? Only by going full-screen in Firefox can I get that abortion of a signature to fit on an LCD running at 1280x1024.
How do you figure?Krappyappy wrote:
all the kiddies bitched about it constantly for the past 3 months. well, the moaning and whining worked, now infantry becomes even more powerless against vehicles.
I don't see a list of thing they're doing in 1.3, just a very vague mention of tweaking them in some way in 1.2. Why don't we wait and see what they do to it before getting all worked up about it?Krappyappy wrote:
seems like they'll be nerfing the GLs in 1.3. GG whiner newbs, you win again.
If they give it a minimum distance to arm, or tweak it so the "fire-it-at-your-feet" crowd actually takes damage, is that necessarily a bad thing?
So what's the problem? A lot of them probably will, because they'll adapt.Krappyappy wrote:
the funny thing is, the people who were good before the patches will probably still own after.
Good gamers will simply adapt their play style and keep going. Crybabies will bitch, whine and moan that their favored exploits are gone.
1. Spot tank
2. Soil shorts
3. Die
2. Soil shorts
3. Die
Preach it, brother.Darth_Fleder wrote:
I just adapt.
Improvise, adapt, overcome.
It's difficult to put into words just how absolutely fucking ridiculous you sound.WaGoN_aTTacK wrote:
it's tite how now instead of dissing teh stats, u gotsta diss meh grammar!! ;_; <--crying
/"Oh you think you're cool writing like that"
/"u must be 12"
/"all u do is play kark"
THIS IS WHY I LOVE MAKING BABIES CRY
i'm soooo mean!
face it: u n00bs thought u had th3 commander strats just cause u gots da pts
btw who cares about staff officer? LOLS if i want to command i'll play CIV 4 or Command & Conquer
CAN WE PLZ STIKK 2 DA SUBJECT:
my bad guys, didn't mean to attract all da MAD haterz, i guess if u want somethin done right, u gotta do it urself.
end t3h flames, peeps. pwnt.
-sincerely,
wagon wheel hunka hanka cheese (or something...)
Then play the insurgents for 81:32:58 more.kessel! wrote:
I want mine to be the insurgents.
The military's actual use of UAVs is absolutely nothing even remotely similar to BF2's in-game implementation of the UAV. The two cannot even be even loosely compared.WaGoN_aTTacK wrote:
but back to commanders: let's think real-world situation....deploying UAV/ any military equipment is expensive and designed to maximize its use, i.e. where most people can use it.
I'm surprised it was allowed to go on this long...not like it's got anything to do with BF2 anyway.tthf wrote:
man has this thread grown into a monster (in size)...
I guess not using the search is a much more serious transgression that intentionally inciting a flamewar.