IRONCHEF wrote:
And hey, for the matter of potentially selling nuclear weaponry to potential enemies of the US...
Have we not sold weaponry to probably the most aggressive country on the planet (other than us) being Israel? It is widely believed theyhave nukes (as early as the 60's), and they blatantly destroy palestinians, lebanese, syrians, and probably jordanians with the technology and arms we sell them. So who is the hypocrit saying NK can't have nukes or sell them to iranians, al qaeda, or other enemies of our country?
This thread is about hypocracy. I have already said i don't want anyone to have nukes, but i'm being a debater and debating hypocracy but too many of you can't control yourselves and debate the hypocracy of telling NK they can't have nukes. And now pollux thinks everyone who disaagrees with him is intelligent, lacks sense of history, and has no grasp on reality when all he had to do was debate hypocracy. But then trolls will do what they must do.
No.
Not potential enemys of the US, the rest of the WORLD. there are more places then Disney land you know to go on holiday, try it.
Sorry about that. But NK having nukes is dangerous for everyone. South Korea must be feeling a bit down in the dumps, and the neighbouring countrys must be a bit worryed. Look if you want to join the Nuculer club..you have to abide by the rules, and NK isnt giving them a damn.