Title says it all. They announced in June that this would be happening in July yet I haven't heard anything. What's the deal?
Search
Search results: 127 found, showing up to 50
Hm.
Such as our first two postersSgt. Sergio Bennet 3rd wrote:
the only enemy u have is the enemy within....
...
Why is this bad news, again?
Why is this bad news, again?
Haha 10/10.. I love it. I don't get the guy walking around on the right though...?
z0mg dont ban mii from teh internatz plz!!!!11!1 i r edit3d my p0stATG wrote:
Keep your lolcats in teh bag nOob .kingofkolt wrote:
This seems like an appropriate time to introduce...
THE LOLCAT!
http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t105 … freeze.jpg
What is antistropic filtering and where is the option to change it in BF2? I've never seen such an option...?
7/10 carnage. It just works.
This seems like an appropriate time to introduce...
THE LOLCAT!
http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t105 … freeze.jpg
(Image edited out to avoid ban-age.)
THE LOLCAT!
http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t105 … freeze.jpg
(Image edited out to avoid ban-age.)
Lawlz...DonFck wrote:
But we'll discuss the difference between socialism, communism and the fact that these both exist only in theory and that we have yet to see a country which has implemented the aforementioned ideologies correctly, later.
But they do have a communist government (in name at least), even if their economy is capitalist.
I think those quotes are from people making fun of kids aged 12-16. Kinda like the whole lolcats/Caturday thing. For example, my sig says "Battlefield 2 pwnage"... it's not that I actually talk or write like that online, I'm doing it for the humor of it.
Um.. guys? China is socialist. Communism is a form of socialism.
I would actually suggest that, if the reinstall of both games and then the patch doesn't work, you should then copy the shader files to the shaders folder and then run the 1.41 patch again. That's what's worked for me.
Did you install the 1.41 patch or an earlier one? This isn't a graphics card driver issue, I'm pretty sure. This problem has happened a lot, in Special Forces at least (is that the game you're trying to get into?). You may have to copy all the files from shaders_client.zip to the shaders folder (which is located in the same folder as shaders_client.zip) and then run the 1.41 patch again.
Except they won't realize it, because it's not true. Stupid/useless people will always get attention and encourage similarly stupid/useless people to also try to get attention.golgoj4 wrote:
Maybe in your corner of wherever this has no effect, but living in LA, its nice to see a crack down / slap down of the useless whores that populate this city. Maybe they will realize they they too, can be dropped left behind for having no class, as opposed to the current atmosphere.
Which is exactly why they won't realize it, because people can't help but pay attention to them. Remember a few months ago when AP decided not to run any stories about Paris Hilton for a while and see what happened? Well, not long later (around the time of her arrest) they just couldn't help themselves and she's back in the news again. America will never be able to get over its obsession with celebrities.mikkel wrote:
The only way that's going to happen to any significant extent is to just not pay attention to them.
No. She's already made more than enough from her appearances, movies, "music," etc.Smithereener wrote:
Does this mean that she'll actually have to *gasp* work for money?
Now, that's hot.
Cool.
PS - Noob question here... can you guide the rocket by holding down the click and dragging around the rocket?
PS - Noob question here... can you guide the rocket by holding down the click and dragging around the rocket?
In keeping with the train theme:
You play PK?_1_MAN-ARMY.17 wrote:
i remember him playing pk with me 5-6 months ago
lol... He shoulda never started this thread in the first place...
Go into the shaders_client.zip file in the mods/xpack folder, and copy all the files into the shaders folder in mods/xpack. Then run the 1.41 BF2 patch program (even if you already have), and you should be all set.
EDIT: Actually, it might be that all you need to do is run the BF2 patch, and not the copying of files. However, if running the patch causes an error that doesn't even let you get into SF anymore, then you need to do the copying I just described. Important question, though: Are you using Windows Vista? If so, you need to right-click the shortcut to Battlefield 2 on your computer, and check the box that says "Run this program as an administrator."
EDIT: Actually, it might be that all you need to do is run the BF2 patch, and not the copying of files. However, if running the patch causes an error that doesn't even let you get into SF anymore, then you need to do the copying I just described. Important question, though: Are you using Windows Vista? If so, you need to right-click the shortcut to Battlefield 2 on your computer, and check the box that says "Run this program as an administrator."
Well I guess I'm just not sure what the purpose is of some guy in a gas mask. But I really like the sig...NeXuS4909 wrote:
There is no relevence to bf2...
9/10.. I love the colors and the way it looks scratched and weathered, but I'm not sure what the relevance of it is to BF2..
Since I've started visiting BF2S.com, I've noticed that this site's forums has one of the most conservative populations of any online community I've ever visited. This was a bit of a surprise to me since I live in Boston and I'm used to liberalism (despite the fact that some of my immediate and especially extended family is extremely conservative). I'm also usually involved in online "communities" (i.e., forums) which contain people with mostly liberal viewpoints. I say all that to say, I would like to ask the people here (liberals, conservatives, and everyone in between) what their thoughts are on environmentalism, especially in relation to the world's rising concerns about global warming. I'm especially curious about about why it seems that conservatives are traditionally opposed to the idea that global warming is in fact real and happening right now.
This question was inspired by the fact that I just was looking at another thread on here called "What do you drive?". The first post had a picture of a gas-guzzling SUV (and claimed it did 16MPG). The post said something to the effect that Americans love "BIG" vehicles. It may be worth mentioning that the poster's title (the words under a poster's name) read "Redneck". So it got me thinking, do conservatives mock the idea that these kind of vehicles (among a million other factors) could actually result in a speedier demise of the human race? For that matter, do they believe that IS the case, but simply do not care? Do any of you (liberals or conservatives) feel that you have a responsibility to the environment to do what is within your power to not exploit natural resources more than necessary? I don't mean becoming a hippie and/or sitting in trees that are under threat of being cut down. I'm more referring to, say, buying gas-efficient vehicles, recycling, using public transportation if/when available, etc.
Just to explain where I'm coming from: I never thought I could ever be what some would dub an environmentalist. I always inwardly mocked "tree huggers," believing stereotypes of people in tae-dye t-shirts and long hair smoking weed and protesting that people were destroying their world. But then I turned 12 (just kidding). Seriously though, as I've grown older I've heard more and more about the observations scientists are making about the effect factories, cars, and other such pollution-producing centers have on the ozone layer and the earth's health in general. There are very few voices lending any credibility to the idea that these observations are wrong or flawed, and there are far more voices that tend to agree with the belief that our planet is, in fact, in some level of danger (what level tends to vary from voice to voice). There are also some who say that the globe's observable warming is simply part of a huge cycle the earth goes through that may last several hundred (or thousand) years. (In my opinion, though, one cycle could mean the end of a species, and in this case the unfortunate species could very well be the human one.)
So here's the way I see it now: Even if the situation is being exaggerated somewhat, or even if some people are trying to exploit fear of doom for personal gain, there is still plenty of reason to make some effort to reduce the "footprint" I leave on the environment through my lifestyle. Even if we are in a huge cycle of the earth, and even if that cycle will inevitably result in the end of the human race, couldn't we at least make an attempt to extend our cycle a bit longer by being responsible? I really don't care if my being "manipulated" by scientists gives them an ego trip as long as my being concerned about the environment does the world good. My feeling is, you live for about 70 years and then your time on earth is done. So during those 70 years, will your overall effect on the earth be positive or negative? Will you exploit animals and nature for your personal pleasure (and maybe for the sake of being "manly," as seems to be the motivation of some), or will you have done your part to reduce the harm done to the earth? I don't think any one person can really change the world, in terms of getting EVERYONE all at once to comply and just BE environmentally friendly; instead, the only way to turn around the pollution problems we're having (if they are indeed real) is for people to take responsibility on an individual-by-individual basis and adjust their own lifestyle as necessary. So for example, if I'm ever rich enough to be able to afford this luxury, you still won't see me wearing a coat made of real fur, or driving a super-sized SUV (unless it is absolutely necessary for the sake of carpooling, in which case it may actually be more fuel-efficient than several people driving different cars), or living in luxury but paying for "environmental credits" like Al Gore so hypocritically does. Even if there isn't much truth to the idea that the earth is facing impending doom and destruction, I DO think that it is pretty much undeniable that harm is being done to the planet when massive forests are being cut down for paper, or unrecyclable products like Styrofoam cups and plates are being produced and discarded at such a fast pace. All this luxury and waste seems unnecessary and foolish.
OK, this post was really long and probably kind of disjointed. (I'm not about to read through everything I just wrote myself and edit it all, so if you did take the time to read it all... WORD.) But I hope I got my thoughts across. And I'd like to HEAR (read) thoughts from all sides also. So yeah, what are your thoughts about the current rising concerns throughout the world about global warming, how are YOU personally responding to it (i.e., adjusting -- or not adjusting -- your lifestyle as you see fit), how would you like to see yourself and others respond to these concerns, etc.?
- kingofkolt
This question was inspired by the fact that I just was looking at another thread on here called "What do you drive?". The first post had a picture of a gas-guzzling SUV (and claimed it did 16MPG). The post said something to the effect that Americans love "BIG" vehicles. It may be worth mentioning that the poster's title (the words under a poster's name) read "Redneck". So it got me thinking, do conservatives mock the idea that these kind of vehicles (among a million other factors) could actually result in a speedier demise of the human race? For that matter, do they believe that IS the case, but simply do not care? Do any of you (liberals or conservatives) feel that you have a responsibility to the environment to do what is within your power to not exploit natural resources more than necessary? I don't mean becoming a hippie and/or sitting in trees that are under threat of being cut down. I'm more referring to, say, buying gas-efficient vehicles, recycling, using public transportation if/when available, etc.
Just to explain where I'm coming from: I never thought I could ever be what some would dub an environmentalist. I always inwardly mocked "tree huggers," believing stereotypes of people in tae-dye t-shirts and long hair smoking weed and protesting that people were destroying their world. But then I turned 12 (just kidding). Seriously though, as I've grown older I've heard more and more about the observations scientists are making about the effect factories, cars, and other such pollution-producing centers have on the ozone layer and the earth's health in general. There are very few voices lending any credibility to the idea that these observations are wrong or flawed, and there are far more voices that tend to agree with the belief that our planet is, in fact, in some level of danger (what level tends to vary from voice to voice). There are also some who say that the globe's observable warming is simply part of a huge cycle the earth goes through that may last several hundred (or thousand) years. (In my opinion, though, one cycle could mean the end of a species, and in this case the unfortunate species could very well be the human one.)
So here's the way I see it now: Even if the situation is being exaggerated somewhat, or even if some people are trying to exploit fear of doom for personal gain, there is still plenty of reason to make some effort to reduce the "footprint" I leave on the environment through my lifestyle. Even if we are in a huge cycle of the earth, and even if that cycle will inevitably result in the end of the human race, couldn't we at least make an attempt to extend our cycle a bit longer by being responsible? I really don't care if my being "manipulated" by scientists gives them an ego trip as long as my being concerned about the environment does the world good. My feeling is, you live for about 70 years and then your time on earth is done. So during those 70 years, will your overall effect on the earth be positive or negative? Will you exploit animals and nature for your personal pleasure (and maybe for the sake of being "manly," as seems to be the motivation of some), or will you have done your part to reduce the harm done to the earth? I don't think any one person can really change the world, in terms of getting EVERYONE all at once to comply and just BE environmentally friendly; instead, the only way to turn around the pollution problems we're having (if they are indeed real) is for people to take responsibility on an individual-by-individual basis and adjust their own lifestyle as necessary. So for example, if I'm ever rich enough to be able to afford this luxury, you still won't see me wearing a coat made of real fur, or driving a super-sized SUV (unless it is absolutely necessary for the sake of carpooling, in which case it may actually be more fuel-efficient than several people driving different cars), or living in luxury but paying for "environmental credits" like Al Gore so hypocritically does. Even if there isn't much truth to the idea that the earth is facing impending doom and destruction, I DO think that it is pretty much undeniable that harm is being done to the planet when massive forests are being cut down for paper, or unrecyclable products like Styrofoam cups and plates are being produced and discarded at such a fast pace. All this luxury and waste seems unnecessary and foolish.
OK, this post was really long and probably kind of disjointed. (I'm not about to read through everything I just wrote myself and edit it all, so if you did take the time to read it all... WORD.) But I hope I got my thoughts across. And I'd like to HEAR (read) thoughts from all sides also. So yeah, what are your thoughts about the current rising concerns throughout the world about global warming, how are YOU personally responding to it (i.e., adjusting -- or not adjusting -- your lifestyle as you see fit), how would you like to see yourself and others respond to these concerns, etc.?
- kingofkolt
Disclaimer: I'm not really emo. That was for a movie lol
Wtf?
I voted Airwolf for his Napoleon Dynamite-ish attitude in the pic Plus FFLink looked like he was taking himself a little too seriously in his pose lol.
Ah, I did not even realize twas such a thing as a poll section.
Cool beans.
Cool beans.
I don't think that's what Braddock is referring to when he says our geography education needs improvement. I think he's referring to Bush in March 2003:k30dxedle wrote:
"Where's Asia? Is that in New York City?"Braddock wrote:
I'm not going to vote as I'm not American and don't know enough about your education system ...but I will say this - your geography lessons could do with a little improvement
"Hello, Americurr. On September 11, 2001, we were attacked by turrurrist killurrs from Afghanistan. Today, we're going to invade their country of residence."
And off he goes to Iraq.
Kind of like the doctor that said, "Wait, WHICH leg are we amputating?!"
Battle? How does this work? Is it like, people vote on a 1-vs-1 matchup?FFLink13 wrote:
OK! I have all entrants!
I'll write up all the things, and start the first battle at 20:00 GMT.
Could be... This guy (and several other people who tried it) reinstalled the game without the map and it worked fine afterward. Verrry interesting find:
http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jsp … dID=248508
http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jsp … dID=248508
Wait for it, waaaait for it.......Spark wrote:
Rofl that's funny as.kingofkolt wrote:
Someone mentioned nitro92 and it made me curious so I did some searching and found that post. This is pretty funny:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=10113
?
I was laughing pretty hard when I read it. He got reported by like 50 people within two pages of thread-age. lolUnreal_Gunner wrote:
HAHAHAHHAHA... i gotta admit that is the funniest hack catching ive seen.. Especially since he tryed to cover up the evidence with white boxes HAHAHAkingofkolt wrote:
Someone mentioned nitro92 and it made me curious so I did some searching and found that post. This is pretty funny:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=10113
I must say though, cool hack...
Haha! +1ATG wrote:
Lol, I suck.[REB]Qrite wrote:
i was just going to say something about tht..RedTwizzler wrote:
Rule against shopped images?
Reaches for cell phone camera and an idea....
...and comes up with
treesex!
http://i16.tinypic.com/4xnyqmu.jpg
Sig-age.
I don't get how most of these are "posing"...? Doesn't poser mean you're trying to be something you're not?
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault. And then the expansion packs, Spearhead and Breakthrough.
I was always one of the top "bashers" in my clan (in MOHAA, unlike BF2, you can smash people's head's in with the butt of your gun). I was pretty good at that.
I was always one of the top "bashers" in my clan (in MOHAA, unlike BF2, you can smash people's head's in with the butt of your gun). I was pretty good at that.
Someone mentioned nitro92 and it made me curious so I did some searching and found that post. This is pretty funny:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=10113
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=10113
Being goth as an extra in the film Absent Father (back when I had long hair):
I'd had black lipstick on too but unfortunately I washed it off by the time this pic was taken.
EDIT: Oops, didn't notice only 1 entry per person. Took out the Army pic...
I'd had black lipstick on too but unfortunately I washed it off by the time this pic was taken.
EDIT: Oops, didn't notice only 1 entry per person. Took out the Army pic...
Agreed. And that's what the article seems to say the store was doing. At first, judging from people's posts, I thought this was a situation where people were playing the race card for no reason but to make money. But now that I've read it, it seems most of the people here just look for an excuse to bash black people.san4 wrote:
If the store has a policy of having the security guard check the receipts of black customers but not white customers, the store deserves to get mauled in court.
Holy god... go jump off a bridge, please. Jesus...leesupport wrote:
guess welfare isnt enough these days.
BigmacK wrote:
TBH, I'd like to avoid iTunes.
Why, may I ask (to both)?sportsman11-2cool4u wrote:
#1 always avoid itunes.
Ah, I know what that means.Andoura wrote:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh you will never knowkingofkolt wrote:
Out of curiosity, Andoura, where did you get your sig? Is it someone you know personally? That pic certainly doesn't look like a professional model who knows she's being photographed, so it begs the question...
(It's his drunk passed-out sister.)
Out of curiosity, Andoura, where did you get your sig? Is it someone you know personally? That pic certainly doesn't look like a professional model who knows she's being photographed, so it begs the question...
I was about to say this myself. I think either XP Professional or all 64-bit versions of XP or something support 4GB. Vista only uses all 4 gigs if you have 64-bit version. And I thought I read somewhere that the two home versions of Vista don't support 4GB either (even the 64-bit versions).Smithereener wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure XP can support more than 2G of ram, it's just that anymore would be somewhat overkill. I think you need the 64bit version of Vista anyway to utilize all 4G. But yeah, 2G of ram on Vista might be the reason; XP doesn't utilize as much.MysteryJake wrote:
Vista requires a lot more ram to run, thus why it supports 4 gigs of ram while XP only supports 2, If you had 4 gigs of ram it would eliminate the lag.Punkbu$ter wrote:
Under XP I didn't have this issue, but now that I've moved over to Vista I get awful bad laggage for the first few minutes of a round, even under the lowest settings. I have an e6400 @ stock 2.13ghz, 7900GS and 2gb ram, when playing on XP it was fully capable of running BF2 at the highest settings and 4x aa enabled without a hitch
So... any news?
HURLEY wrote:
lolz at the bootsAndoura wrote:
Damn why are you so sexy Andoura... why ????
http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/2323/1002400gc2.jpg
lolz at your tuft
lolz at your top 10 buttons not being buttoned
lolz at your collar
MacBook Pro camera
If I could get one of those screens that projects an image into midair like in Paycheck, that would be ideal...LT.Victim wrote:
Want him to print it out for you, or do you just want to go at it with the screen?kingofkolt wrote:
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/417/marisakh1.png
haffeysucks, can I f*ck your sig?
Play safe though, we don't want any paper cuts.
haffeysucks, can I f*ck your sig?