Indeed, and some more good rounds later.legionair wrote:
Great rounds today with alot of bf2sers
I also extended my 'longest headshot' to 366m. With the 30mm guns on the Tunguska. ._o
Indeed, and some more good rounds later.legionair wrote:
Great rounds today with alot of bf2sers
Indeed. Proud to have led an EU squad again for the first time in years and some good teamwork out there.Hallvard wrote:
some great rounds tonight with lot of old names
I, for one, will be. EU WILL RIDE AGAINlegionair wrote:
Well, maybe that's an opportunity to have a celebration of Grand re-Opening, when we get together again . (Note, I didn't use "if" we get together)NooBesT wrote:
That's a problem with the non-EU folks, not the thread itself.OrangeHound wrote:
It was just getting spammed by non-EU folks ... there isn't any prohibition to opening it back up.
Having a BF3 server is not a priority imo, first we have to see, how many of us will be "alive".
Mike<Eagle23> wrote:
You can tell me whatever you want, but K30 would not be 18 without any hackstheDude5B wrote:
Age hack?Mike<Eagle23> wrote:
Nice agehack btw
Balls.HaiBai wrote:
april fools...?
PRETENTIOUS MODE ONFloppY_ wrote:
Pinnacle of FPS?Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Maybe, or maybe BF3 will take its placeCamm wrote:
Battlefield 2 is IMO the pinnacle of fps games. We will never see a game as immersive and time-consuming as it again.
far from it...
Pinnacle of it's niché, sure...
WTF? Israel has F-16s, and both engines used in the J-10 (AL-31, WS-10) are lighter than both engines used in the F-16 (F100/F110). Plus the J-10 has a comparable or even better thrust/weight ratio...pace51 wrote:
Yes. Israeli Aircraft Industries made the Lavi to function as a counter to the F-16. Lots of countries needed a counter to the F-16, so China borrowed the Lavi design and made it better. They weren't alllowed to use the original Pratt and Whitney's because of the USA's export bans to China, so they settled with the heavier Russian engines instead. Meaning that the J-10 isn't as powerful as the F-16 in most aspects, although it comes very very close. Besides, the F-16's are sometimes called "flying computers" as some people have said to me. I doubt the J-10 or even the Super-10 has that much technology in it.FEOS wrote:
The Chinese actually got licenses from Russia to produce those aircraft in China...the Chinese-produced versions have different names. That's why they've been doing it for years decades with no bitching from Russia.pace51 wrote:
It's a copy too. It's a copy of Israel's IAI Lavi. It resembles the eurofighter cause of the delta wings and te canards... both of those jets are . China is in love with mig and sukhoi... they just don't admit it. And you're right, I wonder who the JF-17 thunder was plagiarized from...
And, yes, the J-10 looks an awful lot like the Lavi...which looks an awful lot like the F-16. That's one way to get around tech transfer laws.
FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-Trotskygrad wrote:
nope. snf bugs was not filming, methinks.
thisCammRobb wrote:
Anyway, what's the server ip/port for tonight then?
Just thought I'd settle this since nobody bothered to contest it, perhaps because it was near the end of a page on default settings. Yes, that is a J-10 or J-10A (which is not by any stretch of the imagination an aircraft distinct enough to warrant counting it wrong - that'd be like counting someone who correctly identified an F-15 wrong on the grounds that you posted an F-15C). A source more reliable than you says so, using the same picture, except uncropped, watermarked by another source more reliable than you. This is a large version, in which code 50572 is clearly visible, placing it in the 44th Division of the PLAAF, and also meaning it is, in fact, a J-10 or J-10A, according to yet another source more reliable than you.pace51 wrote:
You got Dilberts right, but the one I posted aint the J-10... very similar though
Amusing. The L3 was a holdover from the URL which the source website, military-today.com, used to denote the third picture in the series, and which you incorrectly interpreted as part of the aircraft's designation. The way you used it (inside, at my screen resolution and text size, a 4-line wall of URL since apparently you can't figure out IMG tags or how to remove the Google image search frame) means you cannot have conceivably intended it as an emoticon, and I doubt you can read Aries37's mind. (Aries, do feel free to correct me on this point if he is, in fact, reading your mind.) Searching Google and Google images for "l3 emoticon" and related strings turns up no uses as a purported emoticon.pace51 wrote:
THE l3 WAS AN EMOTICONk30dxedle wrote:
And by yeah, you mean no? There's no such thing as a SEPECAT Jaguar L3, or a Jaguar L-anything. That's a Jaguar GR.3.pace51 wrote:
Yeah.
And by yeah, you mean no? There's no such thing as a SEPECAT Jaguar L3, or a Jaguar L-anything. That's a Jaguar GR.3.pace51 wrote:
Yeah.Aries_37 wrote:
sepecat jaguar l3pace51 wrote:
I adore B-52's, their my favorite bomber.
http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http … s%3Disch:1
Beep. Beep.theDude5B wrote:
where did you disappear to? my computer crashed, then when I came back you were in TS but were not actually there. I was singing to you but got no response
eventually K30 joined in and we invented a new form of OSP Morse code communication