Name That Jet (Aircraft)

2010-05-29 09:31:44

#1226

l41e: Member; +677|6939

pace51 wrote:
k30dxedle wrote:
pace51 wrote:

Yeah.
And by yeah, you mean no? There's no such thing as a SEPECAT Jaguar L3, or a Jaguar L-anything. That's a Jaguar GR.3.
THE l3 WAS AN EMOTICON

Amusing. The L3 was a holdover from the URL which the source website, military-today.com, used to denote the third picture in the series, and which you incorrectly interpreted as part of the aircraft's designation. The way you used it (inside, at my screen resolution and text size, a 4-line wall of URL since apparently you can't figure out IMG tags or how to remove the Google image search frame) means you cannot have conceivably intended it as an emoticon, and I doubt you can read Aries37's mind. (Aries, do feel free to correct me on this point if he is, in fact, reading your mind.) Searching Google and Google images for "l3 emoticon" and related strings turns up no uses as a purported emoticon.

User007: I'm no good with civilian aircraft, but searching airliners.net with the registration turns up a Boeing "777-21H/LR"? Doesn't match what I typically think of as a Boeing variant identifier (aren't they usually 3-digit?), but I'll put it out there anyway.

2010-05-29 09:41:45

#1227

User007Gamer: ???; +21|6273|Dubai, UAE

You've got part of it right, but I'm still gonna leave it open. Good try anyway.

Edit: Here it is again for those of you who don't want to go back a page.

https://img15.imageshack.us/img15/4637/cheaterh.jpg

Last edited by User007Gamer (2010-05-29 09:44:08)

2010-05-29 11:30:39

#1228

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7119

Boeing 777-21HLR

Registration : A6-EwA

Last edited by CC-Marley (2010-05-29 11:33:10)

2010-05-29 13:32:25

#1229

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7119

https://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a278/CC-Marley/Other/hugo-1.jpg

2010-05-29 13:44:50

#1230

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6513|Escea

Dassault Mirage IIIV

2010-05-29 15:17:12

#1231

l41e: Member; +677|6939

pace51 wrote:
You got Dilberts right, but the one I posted aint the J-10... very similar though

Just thought I'd settle this since nobody bothered to contest it, perhaps because it was near the end of a page on default settings. Yes, that is a J-10 or J-10A (which is not by any stretch of the imagination an aircraft distinct enough to warrant counting it wrong - that'd be like counting someone who correctly identified an F-15 wrong on the grounds that you posted an F-15C). A source more reliable than you says so, using the same picture, except uncropped, watermarked by another source more reliable than you. This is a large version, in which code 50572 is clearly visible, placing it in the 44th Division of the PLAAF, and also meaning it is, in fact, a J-10 or J-10A, according to yet another source more reliable than you.

2010-05-30 06:08:43

#1232

User007Gamer: ???; +21|6273|Dubai, UAE

CC-Marley wrote:
Boeing 777-21HLR

Registration : A6-EwA

It's actually a Boeing 777-200LR, but whatever.

2010-05-30 10:28:57

#1233

Stubbee: Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts; +223|7033|Reality

User007Gamer wrote:
CC-Marley wrote:
Boeing 777-21HLR

Registration : A6-EwA
It's actually a Boeing 777-200LR, but whatever.

not according to this site

The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'

2010-05-30 10:36:09

#1234

User007Gamer: ???; +21|6273|Dubai, UAE

Stubbee wrote:
User007Gamer wrote:
CC-Marley wrote:
Boeing 777-21HLR

Registration : A6-EwA
It's actually a Boeing 777-200LR, but whatever.
not according to this site

Yeah, but that's getting a bit too specific. Just wanted the aircraft variant. The digits after the two denote the engine manufacturer (GE in this case).

Edit: Whichever way you look at it, engine manufacturer or otherwise, it's still a 777-200LR.

Last edited by User007Gamer (2010-05-30 10:39:45)

2010-05-30 10:47:01

#1235

Morpheus: This shit still going?; +508|6290|The Mitten

k30dxedle wrote:
pace51 wrote:
You got Dilberts right, but the one I posted aint the J-10... very similar though
Just thought I'd settle this since nobody bothered to contest it, perhaps because it was near the end of a page on default settings. Yes, that is a J-10 or J-10A (which is not by any stretch of the imagination an aircraft distinct enough to warrant counting it wrong - that'd be like counting someone who correctly identified an F-15 wrong on the grounds that you posted an F-15C). A source more reliable than you says so, using the same picture, except uncropped, watermarked by another source more reliable than you. This is a large version, in which code 50572 is clearly visible, placing it in the 44th Division of the PLAAF, and also meaning it is, in fact, a J-10 or J-10A, according to yet another source more reliable than you.

*50752.
Spoiler (highlight to read):
Still a j-10 though

EE (hats

2010-05-30 11:02:38

#1236

pace51: Boom?; +194|5463|Markham, Ontario

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52201/FF.jpg

Exact variant and model, please. And cheating ain't cool.

2010-05-30 13:23:03

#1237

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6513|Escea

F-16N Top Gun

2010-05-30 13:28:06

#1238

pace51: Boom?; +194|5463|Markham, Ontario

M.O.A.B wrote:
F-16N Top Gun

Win.

2010-05-30 13:47:53

#1239

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6513|Escea

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/28748/Fran.PNG

2010-05-30 13:51:13

#1240

pace51: Boom?; +194|5463|Markham, Ontario

Dassault Rafale... want the variant or no?

2010-05-30 13:51:54

#1241

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6513|Escea

Ya

2010-05-30 13:56:53

#1242

pace51: Boom?; +194|5463|Markham, Ontario

M.O.A.B wrote:
Ya

Doesn't look like the C, or maybe it does, I'm no Rafale expert, but due to the lack of a tailfin sensor or bump or whatever that thing is and other stuff... is it the Rafale M?

(My second guess is C, but I think it's the M)

Come on, lucky left mouse button!

BTW The scenery is stunning in that pic. Gotta love France.

Last edited by pace51 (2010-05-30 13:57:31)

2010-05-30 13:58:51

#1243

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6513|Escea

Actually a two-seater B variant, but I'll give you it anyway.

2010-05-30 14:01:18

#1244

pace51: Boom?; +194|5463|Markham, Ontario

M.O.A.B wrote:
Actually a two-seater B variant, but I'll give you it anyway.

Dammit! Oh well, yay!

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52201/G-39-I.jpg

Here's an easy one, name the exact model. Not the variant, just the manufacturer and plane.

Last edited by pace51 (2010-05-30 14:01:32)

2010-05-30 14:14:33

#1245

Morpheus: This shit still going?; +508|6290|The Mitten

pace51 wrote:
M.O.A.B wrote:
Actually a two-seater B variant, but I'll give you it anyway.
Dammit! Oh well, yay!

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52201/G-39-I.jpg

Here's an easy one, name the exact model. Not the variant, just the manufacturer and plane.

...that's not the Gnat, is it?

EE (hats

2010-05-30 14:14:53

#1246

pace51: Boom?; +194|5463|Markham, Ontario

Morpheus wrote:
pace51 wrote:
M.O.A.B wrote:
Actually a two-seater B variant, but I'll give you it anyway.
Dammit! Oh well, yay!

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52201/G-39-I.jpg

Here's an easy one, name the exact model. Not the variant, just the manufacturer and plane.
...that's not the Gnat, is it?

Very close. It became the gnat. The gnat was originally intended as a light fighter, under a different name. The gnat was never used as a fighter outside India and Finland and some other countries, but entered production as an awesome trainer.

Last edited by pace51 (2010-05-30 14:16:02)

2010-05-30 14:16:59

#1247

Morpheus: This shit still going?; +508|6290|The Mitten

pace51 wrote:
Morpheus wrote:
pace51 wrote:
Dammit! Oh well, yay!

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52201/G-39-I.jpg

Here's an easy one, name the exact model. Not the variant, just the manufacturer and plane.
...that's not the Gnat, is it?
Very close. It became the gnat. The gnat was originally intended as a light fighter, under a different name. The gnat was never used as a fighter outside India and Finland and some other countries, but entered production as an awesome trainer.

..so is it the Midge or the t1?
yep. Found it

Last edited by Morpheus (2010-05-30 14:18:33)

EE (hats

2010-05-30 14:18:25

#1248

pace51: Boom?; +194|5463|Markham, Ontario

Morpheus wrote:
pace51 wrote:
Morpheus wrote:
...that's not the Gnat, is it?
Very close. It became the gnat. The gnat was originally intended as a light fighter, under a different name. The gnat was never used as a fighter outside India and Finland and some other countries, but entered production as an awesome trainer.
..so is it the Midge or the t1?

Midge, you got it right. Post the next plane

2010-05-30 14:24:25

#1249

Morpheus: This shit still going?; +508|6290|The Mitten

try this:

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/31499/plane.jpg

EE (hats

2010-05-30 14:28:47

#1250

pace51: Boom?; +194|5463|Markham, Ontario

Morpheus wrote:
try this:
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/31499/plane.jpg

FB-22 StrikeRaptor

Last edited by pace51 (2010-05-30 14:29:26)

BF2S Forums Name That Jet (Aircraft)

pace51 wrote:

k30dxedle wrote:

pace51 wrote:

pace51 wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

User007Gamer wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

Stubbee wrote:

User007Gamer wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

k30dxedle wrote:

pace51 wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

pace51 wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

pace51 wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

pace51 wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

pace51 wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

pace51 wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

Board footer