polarbearz wrote:
Todd_Angelo wrote:
Well maybe. But as a rule you don't have to be good at something to offer constructive input, particularly if you're more intelligent than average.
Hmm. I realized that YOU happened to use this against me, I vaguely remember you saying 'with lousy infantry stats like mine who am I to comment' etc.
Vaguely is right
I didn't actually, what I
asked was, based on your level of vehicle use "why would you think someone should give your opinion on something to do with infantry play as much weight as you think it should have?"
polarbearz wrote:
Well, YOU brought the topic over to public-server play.
Again you're letting your bias cloud your reasoning. The topic had already stopped being about competitive play only before the end of page 1; go check if you don't believe me. I didn't post until page 4! The fact that you're continuing to argue points with just me, despite all the other people disagreeing with you and posting contrary info clearly shows your bias.
polarbearz wrote:
Todd_Angelo wrote:
Like which guy who only had skills as a jet pilot would play on maps without planes? LOL
...And if you're insinuating anything...
Ah, no actually I wasn't although I can see how it might have read. I was just going for an example of a specialist player where there wouldn't be any point in him going in certain maps.
polarbearz wrote:
Todd_Angelo wrote:
polarbearz wrote:
And yes, I realise the presence of a few greats in our midst. dont_be_ss, Nyte, Books, Sinnfein just to name the few players that I've had INCREDIBLE respect for, I have NOTHING but credit for their sniping ability and the insane proficiency they have at playing this supposedly useless class. But to me, they're exceptions to the cause.
Hehe.
Hehe? Yup, that's the level of maturity I expected you to display... Cat got your tongue?
In all seriousness, anyone who has stooped to veiled threats of physical violence can't play the maturity card and expect to be taken seriously. But anyway, the reason I answered that point in that way is I know something you don't, but it's not something I can post as I'm not sure if it was shared in confidence. Perhaps if he's not busy and gets wind of this thread he'll post but otherwise I'll have to leave it at hehe.
polarbearz wrote:
...when answering this pertinent point.
You can't play this card with any legitimacy either; unless you just accidentally overlooked the
very pertinent point that I made that bore directly on your assumed attitude toward my play, but given it's two long orange URLs I think that's doubtful.
polarbearz wrote:
Read Nyte's own comment that a sniper that camps in defense in any other map but karkand, you being the karkand wh0re that you are, is useless.
Just like the attempt at a dig on my WLR I really have to wonder if you even looked at the right stats or do you just misrepresent things as a routine thing? You made some reference to Karkand before and I already told you I practically never play it any more... less than 23% is a whore in what universe?
I'm a Sharqi whore, and proud of it
polarbearz wrote:
Because BF2 = Flags. Nothing else. If you think otherwise you're playing the wrong game, go back to CS.
I've never played CS. The pertinent point you missed or are ignoring bears directly on this. So there's no excuses:
polarbearz wrote:
Let me kindly redefine it for you. PROPER clan matches...
I don't pretend to know anything about competitive BF2 play, that's why I
asked how much weight we should give your views, instead of copping a typical forum toughguy attitude of "you're a wanker so everything you say is bullshit" and just dismissing what you'd said outright, even without the posts of more than a couple of others seeming to show that it wasn't as cut and dried as you stated. So, about competitive play/players, any problems with the premise in what I posted?
polarbearz wrote:
Seeing that I can bench quite a bit, you're just telling everyone you're a fat fuck.
What is 'quite a bit' in your neck of the woods?
And no, I'm not actually fat. I have a heavy skeleton (seriously).