You need to blow all that dust out of there before you do anything.
I'm getting a new heatsink/fan anyway. I can just pick out the dust underneath the current one while i'm replacing the processor. Unless you meant the fan pushing everything out of it.
It's always good to keep everything inside your PC somewhat clean. That means using some pressurized air on eveyrthing inside once in a while. Things run much better when they're clean.
My dad said I should just use the heatsink/fan i'm using right now, do you guys think the one one i'm using right now for a 1.6 will be able to sufficiently cool a 2.2?
How much does compressed air usually cost and where can I get it besides the local computer store. Bowie is too fuckin small and they won't put a god damn computer store here.
You can take it appart and wash it... seriously a little soapy water and let it dry. Remember don't wash the fan :p
I'm talking about just the heat sink here that's it no cards or CPU's etc.
I'm talking about just the heat sink here that's it no cards or CPU's etc.
Last edited by vjs (2006-05-29 11:16:48)
Unlikely if its a stock HSF, and especially not with all that dust in there! Compressed air shouldn't cost more than 5-10 bucks and have a look in a hardware store or somewhere._j5689_ wrote:
My dad said I should just use the heatsink/fan i'm using right now, do you guys think the one one i'm using right now for a 1.6 will be able to sufficiently cool a 2.2?
I know they sell it at walmart.
Our Walmart sucks, there's a bunch of bums that work there giving people bad service. They wouldn't let us eat in the food court because nobody cleaned up after themselves.
walmart, office max, staples, meijers, circuit city, best buy, need I go on?
you want to play BF2 with a Celeron. HA! i laugh at Celerons
AMD > Intel until conroe comes out
AMD > Intel until conroe comes out
Did you even read the fucking thread?stryyker wrote:
you want to play BF2 with a Celeron. HA! i laugh at Celerons
Yeah, why do people keep doing that? Is it really that hard to read a couple of posts?
Last edited by _j5689_ (2006-05-30 01:26:13)
but celey's have very high overclockabilitystryyker wrote:
you want to play BF2 with a Celeron. HA! i laugh at Celerons
AMD > Intel until conroe comes out
Is that even a word...cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
overclockability
no. i just made it upTriggerHappy998 wrote:
Is that even a word...cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
overclockability
no, but enough people use it that it should be one.TriggerHappy998 wrote:
Is that even a word...cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
overclockability
and cyborg, don't start saying that you just made it up! :p
Celerons may be able to overclock a bit, but the performance will not make up for the fact that they are inferior.
meh, the lower cache is the main bottleneck, fsb u can always ramp up...Janus67 wrote:
no, but enough people use it that it should be one.TriggerHappy998 wrote:
Is that even a word...cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
overclockability
and cyborg, don't start saying that you just made it up! :p
Celerons may be able to overclock a bit, but the performance will not make up for the fact that they are inferior.
ok ok, the word overclockability is made up by some guy in ocforums couple of years ago, happy?
It's unfortunate, but the Intel Netburst architecture is heavily dependent on L2/L3 cache and FSB speed. Because of the very deep pipelines, a miss by the BPU results in a massive penalty to flush and repopulate the pipes. This is why the P4's scale so well as cache and FSB are increased.
and this is why intel is dropping the price and realeasing conroeAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
It's unfortunate, but the Intel Netburst architecture is heavily dependent on L2/L3 cache and FSB speed. Because of the very deep pipelines, a miss by the BPU results in a massive penalty to flush and repopulate the pipes. This is why the P4's scale so well as cache and FSB are increased.
That's a fact.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
and this is why intel is dropping the price and realeasing conroeAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
It's unfortunate, but the Intel Netburst architecture is heavily dependent on L2/L3 cache and FSB speed. Because of the very deep pipelines, a miss by the BPU results in a massive penalty to flush and repopulate the pipes. This is why the P4's scale so well as cache and FSB are increased.
yes it is my friend, btw conroe is an overclocking monster... a 2.4 can go to 3.6 on AIRAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's a fact.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
and this is why intel is dropping the price and realeasing conroeAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
It's unfortunate, but the Intel Netburst architecture is heavily dependent on L2/L3 cache and FSB speed. Because of the very deep pipelines, a miss by the BPU results in a massive penalty to flush and repopulate the pipes. This is why the P4's scale so well as cache and FSB are increased.
Proof?cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
yes it is my friend, btw conroe is an overclocking monster... a 2.4 can go to 3.6 on AIRAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's a fact.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
and this is why intel is dropping the price and realeasing conroe
I know that my Pentium M will run circle around my p4. Isnt conroe based somewhat on the shot wide pipe architecture of the Pentium M?
Yes, Conroe is closely related to the Pentium M.Snipedya14 wrote:
Proof?cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
yes it is my friend, btw conroe is an overclocking monster... a 2.4 can go to 3.6 on AIRAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's a fact.
I know that my Pentium M will run circle around my p4. Isnt conroe based somewhat on the shot wide pipe architecture of the Pentium M?
I thought it was more related to a Pentium III design mixed with a Pentium M.
@ Snipedya14: Proof? http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/for … 1&f=56
@ Snipedya14: Proof? http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/for … 1&f=56