NoExtra Medium wrote:
Rugers are garbage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d559b/d559b8df049bcc48f55c8762bbc2a0112c8b3b1b" alt="https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg"
NoExtra Medium wrote:
Rugers are garbage.
Camm wrote:
What's the difference between a 'dry' and a 'wet' suppressor?
So just double the magazine capacity...War Man wrote:
Because a 14 round .45 ACP pistol is better than a 7 round .45 ACP pistol?coke wrote:
Why would you want a double-barrel pistol?
To paraphrase a a site moderator, "You're wrong."west-phoenix-az wrote:
NoExtra Medium wrote:
Rugers are garbage.
Last edited by Extra Medium (2012-11-23 06:45:25)
Mark I13urnzz wrote:
can you back up your opinion why Rugers are garbage?
Well I am assuming at this point you are a revolver guy and as I said, it's hard to fuck up a revolver (although I have seen some obscene revolvers with barrel on bottom cylinder on top). I can appreciate your point of view and I appreciate the fact that you appreciate mine.13urnzz wrote:
ok.
i don't have any experience with those particular models, and i can see that after hands on experience that you do.
i don't happen to agree with the statement 'Rugers are garbage' because of my experience the ones i have owned or used have worked flawlessly.
i hope that you can see how a simple statement will rub someone the wrong way. i do applaud you for backing up your statement - all i'll ask is don't go full retard if someone doesn't happen to agree with it.
lolwatJay wrote:
So my brother owns a Remington 870 that he uses for target shooting. He's already got a soft case for it. Would a speed loader be a good gift?
Can only load two rounds at a time at the range he goes toExtra Medium wrote:
lolwatJay wrote:
So my brother owns a Remington 870 that he uses for target shooting. He's already got a soft case for it. Would a speed loader be a good gift?
If he is only using it for target shooting, get him an extended magazine tube.
Alright. Let's put it this way.Reciprocity wrote:
must be it. they've been making and selling them for over 60 years and then you came along and figured out what the problem was. ruger's greatest threat: mechanically inept paste eaters.
Last edited by Extra Medium (2012-11-23 14:43:50)
Moe probably takes care of his and has done it numerous times. The one I had hadn't been cleaned in several years and I had no experience with it. The point is, it's an obsolete design that's still being manufactured.13urnzz wrote:
Moe didn't seem to have a problem. . .
Well that's awkward.Extra Medium wrote:
Last edited by NeXuS (2012-11-25 18:00:03)
west-phoenix-az wrote: