No.
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
mcminty wrote:
Fucks sake.
If people want to find about about this stuff, they will go to wikipedia and google..
Yes.mcminty wrote:
No.
Good god in heaven noobie,pace51 wrote:
Yes.mcminty wrote:
No.
mcminty wrote:
Fuck wikipedia and google. People want this stuff.
Plus pace, people aren't posting new facts everyday. People post those topics about once every few months. You are posting them regularly and against what the mods asked you to do.
Don't misquote me.pace51 wrote:
mcminty wrote:
Fuck wikipedia and google. People want this stuff.
Actually, ok, I admit there was a time when I was interested in learning about dreams, and how a nuclear bomb worked. Fortunately for me I didn't have to wait for you to write an article about it because I just fucking Google'd/Wikipedia'd it. I also didn't bother anyone in the process and show everyone my results in the minuscule chance that they were interested, too.pace51 wrote:
mcminty wrote:
Fuck wikipedia and google. People want this stuff.
Pace, unlike you we have brains and should we be interested in something, we can find the information ourselves, whether it's searching the internet or going to the library.
I'm not looking to get banned, just to post interesting stuff. Pleas, I naturally post like crazy, not to spite anyone. Umm, while we're on this? What do you people want to know more about? or just stuff you wouldn't normally find out about on wikipedia and google?bennisboy wrote:
Plus pace, people aren't posting new facts everyday. People post those topics about once every few months. You are posting them regularly and against what the mods asked you to do.
I'd like to know more about -- wait a sec, I'll just look it up myself. kthxbai.
i swear to god the mods only vouche for this guy for their own petty amusement and in-jokes
and like as a practical sociological/psychological experiment: they want to push the 'rules' of bf2s to an ever more absurd extent
king_county I was clearly replying to what i perceived as (and what clearly is) a NEW sense of EGOTISM in pace's 'attitude'
you don't have to call me out - i was using the same tone and haughtiness to dismiss the over-keen little grasshopper
and like as a practical sociological/psychological experiment: they want to push the 'rules' of bf2s to an ever more absurd extent
king_county I was clearly replying to what i perceived as (and what clearly is) a NEW sense of EGOTISM in pace's 'attitude'
you don't have to call me out - i was using the same tone and haughtiness to dismiss the over-keen little grasshopper
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
People on this forum wnt to know how to get laid in 30 minutes or less.
go.
go.
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
dont admit to creating RWF threads.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
I didnt say you were looking to get banned, I said you are looking for loopholes to try to justify a new thread every time you read a new book/article and want attention for it.pace51 wrote:
I'm not looking to get banned, just to post interesting stuff. Pleas, I naturally post like crazy, not to spite anyone. Umm, while we're on this? What do you people want to know more about? or just stuff you wouldn't normally find out about on wikipedia and google?bennisboy wrote:
Plus pace, people aren't posting new facts everyday. People post those topics about once every few months. You are posting them regularly and against what the mods asked you to do.
The only issue is the example you're setting for the rest of the forum. The tone of your comments and your own attitude set the stage for those who look up to you. They see you doing it, they're going to follow and point to your posts in their own defense. "but but.... uzi said this and he didn't get warned/banned, etc."Uzique wrote:
i swear to god the mods only vouche for this guy for their own petty amusement and in-jokes
and like as a practical sociological/psychological experiment: they want to push the 'rules' of bf2s to an ever more absurd extent
king_county I was clearly replying to what i perceived as (and what clearly is) a NEW sense of EGOTISM in pace's 'attitude'
you don't have to call me out - i was using the same tone and haughtiness to dismiss the over-keen little grasshopper
You know what I'm saying.... PM me if you'd like to discuss it further.
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
People have said far more harsh things downy!King_County_Downy wrote:
The only issue is the example you're setting for the rest of the forum. The tone of your comments and your own attitude set the stage for those who look up to you. They see you doing it, they're going to follow and point to your posts in their own defense. "but but.... uzi said this and he didn't get warned/banned, etc."Uzique wrote:
i swear to god the mods only vouche for this guy for their own petty amusement and in-jokes
and like as a practical sociological/psychological experiment: they want to push the 'rules' of bf2s to an ever more absurd extent
king_county I was clearly replying to what i perceived as (and what clearly is) a NEW sense of EGOTISM in pace's 'attitude'
you don't have to call me out - i was using the same tone and haughtiness to dismiss the over-keen little grasshopper
You know what I'm saying.... PM me if you'd like to discuss it further.
At the same time as people saying "Oh uzi did it", you cant start having a go a him where you wouldn't others
Jus my 2 cents!
I try to be very equal in my modding. Everything I do "moderator-wise" is meant to be fair to all parties involved. I hope everyone sees that. Uzi included.bennisboy wrote:
People have said far more harsh things downy!
At the same time as people saying "Oh uzi did it", you cant start having a go a him where you wouldn't others
Jus my 2 cents!
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
Fine. Ill only post random crap in the "name the blah" above you and the "post em pictures" thread an blah. Ill cut my posting limit to a couple times a month for "RWF" style articles... actually, 1 every two months. I solemly swear. I dont want attention or an argument. Ill cut my posting frequency.
i normally stick up for pace's threads and his earnest attempts to 'contribute' in some way to the communityKing_County_Downy wrote:
The only issue is the example you're setting for the rest of the forum. The tone of your comments and your own attitude set the stage for those who look up to you. They see you doing it, they're going to follow and point to your posts in their own defense. "but but.... uzi said this and he didn't get warned/banned, etc."Uzique wrote:
i swear to god the mods only vouche for this guy for their own petty amusement and in-jokes
and like as a practical sociological/psychological experiment: they want to push the 'rules' of bf2s to an ever more absurd extent
king_county I was clearly replying to what i perceived as (and what clearly is) a NEW sense of EGOTISM in pace's 'attitude'
you don't have to call me out - i was using the same tone and haughtiness to dismiss the over-keen little grasshopper
You know what I'm saying.... PM me if you'd like to discuss it further.
however im not gonna mince my words when there is an evidently different intent to his posts
hence the 'egotism' part. pacey thinks he's fellated around enough to pull tricks like this now.
one is not amused.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
HOLY CRAP. RAAAAAAAAAAAAGE.
Ok just kidding. Im not pulling loopholes or being egotistic, I will cut my posting limit, this wasnt intended as a loophole. I fucking swear it wasnt intended as that.
Ok just kidding. Im not pulling loopholes or being egotistic, I will cut my posting limit, this wasnt intended as a loophole. I fucking swear it wasnt intended as that.
As do I, but I'll gain a lot more valuable information by looking up things on my own..RTHKI wrote:
i love space <3
Do it Pace. Do it.King_County_Downy wrote:
People on this forum wnt to know how to get laid in 30 minutes or less.
You may not have been trying to, but in that case I suggest you stop and think that if it's real world facts, it goes in the appropriate thread, now let's all move along!pace51 wrote:
HOLY CRAP. RAAAAAAAAAAAAGE.
Ok just kidding. Im not pulling loopholes or being egotistic, I will cut my posting limit, this wasnt intended as a loophole. I fucking swear it wasnt intended as that.
Wait for wife/GF to fall asleep, get laid, win......King_County_Downy wrote:
People on this forum wnt to know how to get laid in 30 minutes or less.
go.
Good point, Ill move on and stop posting so much. However, as an exception to the rule, I think I'll take up Downy's bet and do that article. I will. "Sex advice by a 16 year old canadian virgin"bennisboy wrote:
You may not have been trying to, but in that case I suggest you stop and think that if it's real world facts, it goes in the appropriate thread, now let's all move along!pace51 wrote:
HOLY CRAP. RAAAAAAAAAAAAGE.
Ok just kidding. Im not pulling loopholes or being egotistic, I will cut my posting limit, this wasnt intended as a loophole. I fucking swear it wasnt intended as that.