New PS3 Slim coming - $299

2009-08-18 07:55:40

#1

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6776|Long Island, New York

This is something Sony really, really needed..

http://www.gametrailers.com/news/kmart- … -slim/1269

The Rumors Are Reality”…at least according to Kmart this morning, as the blue light-toting retailer’s website has been updated to confirm a “New, Exciting” SKU for the PlayStation 3. Listed at $299.99, the PS3 SLIM unit is slated for release on August 24, 2009, and has the following description:

PS3, SLIM High-Definition Blu-ray player for the best movie experience. Free PLAYSTATION Network membership. 120GB HDD for downloading games, music, videos, and photos. Includes DUAL SHOCK 3 controller. HDMI output for 1080p resolution.

That’s all we got for now…we’ll let you now when Sony officially confirms this rather exciting news.

All I can hope is that it's not extremely stripped down.

2009-08-18 07:56:42

#2

liquidat0r: wtf.; +2,223|6865|UK

Sounds cool.

2009-08-18 07:57:43

#3

krazed: Admiral of the Bathtub; +619|7018|Great Brown North

how slim?

2009-08-18 08:00:20

#4

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6859|London, England

They hardly really really need it. I still don't understand how people can go on about how the PS3 is a failure and is on a downward spiral and it's all game over. Just...weird really.

And I'd imagine it would be exactly the same as a normal PS3, except slimmer. Dunno what features would be stripped from it. It'll still probably have all the usual ports and the wireless etc..

There's a Sony Conference or some shit that's starting at 5.30BST (I think) today and I think that's when the Slim will be officially announced/unveiled.

I don't care, I've already got my PS3, and it's still working. *touch wood*

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2009-08-18 08:01:28)

2009-08-18 08:11:01

#5

edlT: 2+2=Vagina; +46|5637|USA

Need picsss

2009-08-18 08:21:43

#6

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6776|Long Island, New York

Mekstizzle wrote:
They hardly really really need it. I still don't understand how people can go on about how the PS3 is a failure and is on a downward spiral and it's all game over. Just...weird really.

And I'd imagine it would be exactly the same as a normal PS3, except slimmer. Dunno what features would be stripped from it. It'll still probably have all the usual ports and the wireless etc..

There's a Sony Conference or some shit that's starting at 5.30BST (I think) today and I think that's when the Slim will be officially announced/unveiled.

I don't care, I've already got my PS3, and it's still working. *touch wood*

They're being incredibly outsold every month. They're in 3rd place by far. They needed a jump.

July NPD game sales: Wii sold 253k, Xbox at 203k, PS3 at 122k

(from Geoff Keighly's twitter)

Not to mention major game companies are either no longer supporting it whatsoever (like Valve) or threatening to do so (Activision). A more competitive PS3 can only mean good things for the video game industry. If this doesn't work to boost sales however I wouldn't expect to see a next generation PlayStation.

2009-08-18 08:25:03

#7

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6859|London, England

Yeah, that's abit extreme. It's not exactly a Dreamcast or..... any of those other massively failed consoles. It's already probably done better than the original Xbox did with regards the PS2, and the original Xbox wasn't exactly considered a dramatic failure either. Some people like to cause drama for the sake of drama.

The Wii will always outsell the other two. Really it shouldn't be included but people like to include it for the sake of sales measuring.

2009-08-18 08:30:47

#8

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6776|Long Island, New York

Mekstizzle wrote:
Yeah, that's abit extreme. It's not exactly a Dreamcast or..... any of those other massively failed consoles. It's already probably done better than the original Xbox did with regards the PS2, and the original Xbox wasn't exactly considered a dramatic failure either. Some people like to cause drama for the sake of drama.

The Wii will always outsell the other two. Really it shouldn't be included but people like to include it for the sake of sales measuring.

It doesn't matter. Sony's losing a lot of profit on it and they have a whole other sector of electronics/entertainment they can focus on. If the PS3 continues to lag behind the 360 and Activision holds through on their threat, what I said may become a possibility.

2009-08-18 09:53:48

#9

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6776|Long Island, New York

Sony's GamesCon conference is on now, Kotaku is liveblogging it:

http://kotaku.com/5339926/sony-2009-gam … pectacular

2009-08-18 10:04:13

#10

Andoura: Got loooollllll ?; +853|6877|Montreal, Qc, Canada

Nice!

Now stop asking ''should I buy a ps3 or 360?'' you have the answer

2009-08-18 10:28:48

#11

Spidery_Yoda: Member; +399|6508

What's the RRP of the current PS3's in dollars? For comparison?

Edit: Right it's $399.99, just checked on Amazon.

Last edited by Spidery_Yoda (2009-08-18 10:31:37)

2009-08-18 10:36:02

#12

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6776|Long Island, New York

$299 USD, 120 GB, 33% smaller, 36% lighter. Out in September.

https://web11.twitpic.com/img/24135745-ef7a186f3ac97b083a281c7785385154.4a8ae78d-scaled.jpg

Last edited by Poseidon (2009-08-18 10:41:18)

2009-08-18 10:57:40

#13

Red Forman: Banned; +402|5638

Poseidon wrote:
$299 USD, 120 GB, 33% smaller, 36% lighter. Out in September.

http://web11.twitpic.com/img/24135745-e … scaled.jpg

I have to ask, wtf is the point of the smaller, lighter thing? I mean, are you carrying it across the sahara everyday or something?

2009-08-18 11:01:23

#14

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6859|London, England

Red Forman wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
$299 USD, 120 GB, 33% smaller, 36% lighter. Out in September.

http://web11.twitpic.com/img/24135745-e … scaled.jpg
I have to ask, wtf is the point of the smaller, lighter thing? I mean, are you carrying it across the sahara everyday or something?

Yeah, never understood that. Although I guess if it's smaller that means it takes up less space...wherever you decide to put it. Usually it's just about translating it into the thing being cheaper to produce, so it's cheaper at the stores.

Oh yeah and can someone rehost the pic, wtf is twitpic, something normal that works, like photobucket or tinypic, or bf2s.

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2009-08-18 11:01:57)

2009-08-18 11:02:22

#15

Red Forman: Banned; +402|5638

bollocks. an ipod nano is more than the regular one.

Last edited by Red Forman (2009-08-18 11:02:39)

2009-08-18 11:04:41

#16

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6859|London, England

Yeah but that's Apple, you can't apply normal business sense to Apple.

2009-08-18 11:06:33

#17

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6709

Mekstizzle wrote:
Yeah but that's Apple, you can't apply normal business sense to Apple.

Well, you can.

And an iPod Nano doesn't cost more than a normal one, at all .

It seems the fault lies in consumer sense and knowledge, not business strategy...

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2009-08-18 11:09:41

#18

Red Forman: Banned; +402|5638

that true actually. i dunno. dont own one. just figured the newer one would be more.

2009-08-18 11:11:20

#19

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6859|London, England

Yeah I was just going by what he said, and then took that as an opportunity to knock Apple, cos I do that

2009-08-18 11:12:50

#20

Red Forman: Banned; +402|5638

Mekstizzle wrote:
took that as an opportunity to knock Apple, cos I do that

nothing wrong with that. yuppiepods are fail anyway.

2009-08-18 11:53:59

#21

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6893

I'm really excited for this. Been reading Kotaku for a while and seeing the massive amounts of signs that point to the rumor of a slim being possibly true. I want a PS3 very badly, but with each console generation, I've had to wait later and later before I could finally afford to buy the console (or before I was willing to put enough money into it) [e.g., I didn't get a PS2 until a few years after it had initially come out, looks like for the PS3 it'll be 3 or 4?].

However, one concern with this smaller version is if it's going to be stripped-down like the OP mentioned. Built-in wireless is extremely handy these days, and more importantly, I must be able to switch out the HDD easily.

EDIT: One more thing: I doubt the slim version will be released in the coming weeks of August. I think it could possibly be delayed until later. They're probably gonna go with a price drop of the original PS3 just to clear stock first.

Last edited by mtb0minime (2009-08-18 11:56:13)

2009-08-18 11:56:28

#22

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5988|شمال

If it is true, I will buy one

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2009-08-18 12:00:39

#23

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6776|Long Island, New York

https://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/08/custom_1250619126248_PS3_Controller_.jpg

2009-08-18 12:09:04

#24

SamBo:D: Banned; +236|5735|England

bigger one looks better

2009-08-18 12:12:49

#25

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6893

SamBo:D wrote:
bigger one looks better

Agree. I liked the shininess of it, even if it means I'd get fingerprints on it. None of this dull matte crap

I would orgasm if at their press conference they also announced the new slim version had backwards compatibility as well but that would never happen

Last edited by mtb0minime (2009-08-18 12:13:45)

BF2S Forums New PS3 Slim coming - $299

Mekstizzle wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Red Forman wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

SamBo:D wrote:

Board footer