BMW Awesomeness

2009-08-14 18:19:14

#26

Toilet Sex: one love, one pig; +1,775|6569

Defiance wrote:
Toilet Sex wrote:
looks old, boxy and dated.
I think it looks very nice, not perfect; I would soften the angles on the very front of it, but I don't think that "it's old" is a good reason to dismiss it's styling. Back when that style was the in-style, you could only be caught dead saying it was ugly. Now that other cars don't look so much like it, it's suddenly turned ugly? That doesn't make any sense at all.

i don't like old cars generally, so for me it is. it looks ugly to... to me and now.

♥

2009-08-14 20:32:20

#27

Mitch: 16 more years; +877|6522|South Florida

Really wish i knew what kinda horse that baby put out

15 more years! 15 more years!

2009-08-14 21:53:15

#28

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5747|شمال

V10 is a bit too big for E30 body? well, anti-spinsystem will most likely be needed.

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2009-08-14 23:26:20

#29

VicktorVauhn: Member; +319|6389|Southern California

Beduin wrote:
V10 is a bit too big for E30 body? well, anti-spinsystem will most likely be needed.

Right foot?

2009-08-14 23:55:24

#30

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5747|شمال

VicktorVauhn wrote:
Beduin wrote:
V10 is a bit too big for E30 body? well, anti-spinsystem will most likely be needed.
Right foot?

lol, yeah. explain please

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2009-08-15 00:04:05

#31

-MetaL*: Sup guies; +157|5631|Southern California

Olden day M3's are sick.

2009-08-15 00:09:03

#32

VicktorVauhn: Member; +319|6389|Southern California

Beduin wrote:
VicktorVauhn wrote:
Beduin wrote:
V10 is a bit too big for E30 body? well, anti-spinsystem will most likely be needed.
Right foot?
lol, yeah. explain please

Really need it explained? Use your foot to do what the computer would and drive the fucking car on your own.

2009-08-15 00:23:49

#33

Defiance: Member; +438|6668

Beduin wrote:
VicktorVauhn wrote:
Beduin wrote:
V10 is a bit too big for E30 body? well, anti-spinsystem will most likely be needed.
Right foot?
lol, yeah. explain please

I can't find the quote verbatim or the source, but someone important from some (probably italian?) car firm said "You've got two feet, use them" in response to a question about the absence of a traction control system in some particular car.

2009-08-15 00:54:27

#34

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5747|شمال

VicktorVauhn wrote:
Beduin wrote:
VicktorVauhn wrote:
Right foot?
lol, yeah. explain please
Really need it explained? Use your foot to do what the computer would and drive the fucking car on your own.

Cause you are a bad ass, vicktor, am not

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2009-08-15 01:38:17

#35

VicktorVauhn: Member; +319|6389|Southern California

Beduin wrote:
VicktorVauhn wrote:
Beduin wrote:

lol, yeah. explain please
Really need it explained? Use your foot to do what the computer would and drive the fucking car on your own.
Cause you are a bad ass, vicktor, am not

Ehhh when your at the point of building a tube frame V10 E30 lets hope you can drive it.

Besides, half the fun is trying

2009-08-15 05:23:10

#36

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6562|Area 51

Toilet Sex wrote:
Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Uhhh, OK. I personally think it's butt ugly.
Same

looks old, boxy and dated.

2009-08-15 08:45:09

#37

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6688|Devon, England

Looked good until I saw this.

2009-08-15 08:46:11

#38

Gooners: Wiki Contributor; +2,700|6629

FFLink wrote:
Looked good until I saw this.

wat @ you

2009-08-15 08:48:06

#39

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6688|Devon, England

Gooners wrote:
FFLink wrote:
Looked good until I saw this.
wat @ you

I like sleek cars, and that's just as it was said:

".. In a box."

Not pretty.

2009-08-15 08:48:27

#40

Gooners: Wiki Contributor; +2,700|6629

FFLink wrote:
Gooners wrote:
FFLink wrote:
Looked good until I saw this.
wat @ you
I like sleek cars, and that's just as it was said:

".. In a box."

Not pretty.

g
t
f
o

2009-08-15 17:41:34

#41

VicktorVauhn: Member; +319|6389|Southern California

https://www.dcr62.net/Web%20Page%20Pics/Front%20Cover%20Pic.JPG

https://www.jmdlux.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/e30m3.jpg

https://www.worldofstock.com/slides/TRC1563.jpg

https://www.dtmpower.net/forum/attachments/e30-m3/16781d1034429432-yeeeeeehaw-e30-m3-rally-pic-e30m3rally.jpeg

https://www.bmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/e30_m3.jpg

Boxy = good.

2009-08-15 17:45:05

#42

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6646

Ewww they're old, and therefore ugly.

2009-08-15 17:45:34

#43

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6736|Toronto | Canada

VicktorVauhn wrote:
Boxy = good.

It really isnt

Boxxy on the other hand...

2009-08-15 18:44:36

#44

Slarty: Member; +37|5961|Ingerland

Anyone who's driven an E30 M3 will realise that what they've done with that is nothing short of sacrilege

2009-08-15 19:56:36

#45

VicktorVauhn: Member; +319|6389|Southern California

Slarty wrote:
Anyone who's driven an E30 M3 will realise that what they've done with that is nothing short of sacrilege

Depends on how well it was done Like I said, Id like to see corner weights cause I am guessing the engine weighs at least a hundred pounds more.... But it looks like they maintained the suspension geometry and otherwise lost a fair bit of weight while adding a lot of power?

You are right in one thing though... if they really started with an M3 they shouldn't have, because they didn't leave enough of it in place for it to have mattered and E30 M3's are getting rarer...

2009-08-15 20:02:51

#46

Slarty: Member; +37|5961|Ingerland

AFAIK the original E30 M3 engine was all alloy, so a V10 replacement has got to weigh and awful lot more than +100 LB's.

And you're right, they are getting rare so to bastardise one in that way is just, well.

2009-08-15 20:46:51

#47

VicktorVauhn: Member; +319|6389|Southern California

Slarty wrote:
AFAIK the original E30 M3 engine was all alloy, so a V10 replacement has got to weigh and awful lot more than +100 LB's.

And you're right, they are getting rare so to bastardise one in that way is just, well.

I don't know the engine that came with that car so I wasn't gonna say anything to specific, thats why I just left it @ 100lbs.

Depending on the motor, sometimes you can do more then you would think with out adding much weight. Like all the LSx swaps, at times its a LIGHTER option, even in 4 cylinder cars.

2009-08-15 21:37:36

#48

Blade4509: Wrench turnin' fool; +202|5506|America

Way better than that boxed shit...

https://www.zcars.com.au/images/novitec-ferrari-f430-tu-nero1.jpg

"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"

2009-08-15 21:57:12

#49

Gooners: Wiki Contributor; +2,700|6629

Blade4509 wrote:
Way better than that boxed shit... http://www.zcars.com.au/images/novitec- … -nero1.jpg

ah ha ha ha ha

2009-08-15 22:25:08

#50

-MetaL*: Sup guies; +157|5631|Southern California

Blade4509 wrote:
Way better than that boxed shit... http://www.zcars.com.au/images/novitec- … -nero1.jpg

lol Ferrari.

Sorry ZR-1 >>> F430.

BF2S Forums BMW Awesomeness

Defiance wrote:

Toilet Sex wrote:

Beduin wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Beduin wrote:

Beduin wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Beduin wrote:

Beduin wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Beduin wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Beduin wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Beduin wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Beduin wrote:

Toilet Sex wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

FFLink wrote:

Gooners wrote:

FFLink wrote:

FFLink wrote:

Gooners wrote:

FFLink wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

Slarty wrote:

Slarty wrote:

Blade4509 wrote:

Blade4509 wrote:

Board footer