SourceAs a part of a small sect of audio enthusiests who loathe the company Bose Corp. for its marketing deception, shortcutting in manufacturing, and shameless consumer trickery, I was recently passed on a website written by a "Bose-o-phile", who was defending the company. Upon reading his site, I vowed to represent our side: the TRUTH. However, knowing very little about the products themselves other than the fact that they sound bad for the price, I took it upon myself to audition the Bose AM-15 and perform a little "surgery" on them while I was at it. The review on this page is directed towards the Acoustimass-15, one of Bose's most popular systems, and holds truths to the entire Acoustimass and Lifestyle series products as well. After all, the Lifestyle system is merely Acoustimass speakers packaged with a Bose integrated preamp. The AM-15 is priced at US$1299.99 MSRP. When you are done reading, check out my Bose alternatives page here.
Bose, the Apple of sound equipment. We have a Bose system in school. It was fuck expensive, and is easily out-classed by my home-built 2.1 system. That uses parts from a fucking portable radio!
I gotta try to shoot a comparison on my mp3 player tomorrow.
I gotta try to shoot a comparison on my mp3 player tomorrow.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Not bad. A month or two ago I was in class and somehow headphones came up, whereupon someone proposed that the 'best sounding little headphones are those Bose ones with the black and white wires.' All I could say was no, try these Shure E2Cs...
Klipsch FTW... I love mine.
best part of the article IMO "Audio newbies often throw out the "But I heard that Bose is good!" defense, to which I respond "From who?" Was it a sound engineer, electrical engineer, materials scientist, studio engineer, sound producer, recording professional, musician, Mark Levinson? Ray Dolby? George Lucas? Anyone credible? Or was it your neighbor with the GoldStar walkman, Teac boom box, Funai mini-system, and Sylvania receiver? Perhaps the ubiquitous Bose Ads that they find in completely irrelevant magazines such as Popular Science, Times, Playboy, GQ, People, Astronomy, etc, had some sort of subliminal effect against the better of their judgment? But that's just conjecture..."
best part of the article IMO "Audio newbies often throw out the "But I heard that Bose is good!" defense, to which I respond "From who?" Was it a sound engineer, electrical engineer, materials scientist, studio engineer, sound producer, recording professional, musician, Mark Levinson? Ray Dolby? George Lucas? Anyone credible? Or was it your neighbor with the GoldStar walkman, Teac boom box, Funai mini-system, and Sylvania receiver? Perhaps the ubiquitous Bose Ads that they find in completely irrelevant magazines such as Popular Science, Times, Playboy, GQ, People, Astronomy, etc, had some sort of subliminal effect against the better of their judgment? But that's just conjecture..."
Last edited by <SS>SonderKommando (2009-01-25 12:42:18)
If my pr0n endorses Bose, then I shall too!!!<SS>SonderKommando wrote:
Klipsch FTW... I love mine.
best part of the article IMO "Audio newbies often throw out the "But I heard that Bose is good!" defense, to which I respond "From who?" Was it a sound engineer, electrical engineer, materials scientist, studio engineer, sound producer, recording professional, musician, Mark Levinson? Ray Dolby? George Lucas? Anyone credible? Or was it your neighbor with the GoldStar walkman, Teac boom box, Funai mini-system, and Sylvania receiver? Perhaps the ubiquitous Bose Ads that they find in completely irrelevant magazines such as Popular Science, Times, Playboy, GQ, People, Astronomy, etc, had some sort of subliminal effect against the better of their judgment? But that's just conjecture..."
I don't care what you say, Bose is next to that picture of ____ so I shall buy it!!!
lolololl.
I just assumed that for Bose to be able to charge so much money for their speakers, they must be the best of the best. I'm glad I didn't buy from them, or else I would be pissed after reading that review. Thanks for the info
TheDonkey wrote:
If my pr0n endorses Bose, then I shall too!!!<SS>SonderKommando wrote:
Klipsch FTW... I love mine.
best part of the article IMO "Audio newbies often throw out the "But I heard that Bose is good!" defense, to which I respond "From who?" Was it a sound engineer, electrical engineer, materials scientist, studio engineer, sound producer, recording professional, musician, Mark Levinson? Ray Dolby? George Lucas? Anyone credible? Or was it your neighbor with the GoldStar walkman, Teac boom box, Funai mini-system, and Sylvania receiver? Perhaps the ubiquitous Bose Ads that they find in completely irrelevant magazines such as Popular Science, Times, Playboy, GQ, People, Astronomy, etc, had some sort of subliminal effect against the better of their judgment? But that's just conjecture..."
I don't care what you say, Bose is next to that picture of cock so I shall buy it!!!
lolololl.
lol.. My boss just bought a LIFESTYLE® V10 home entertainment system with a soundDock. 3000$
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Too long; didn't read. Someone summarize it for me.
bose are crap and overpriced etcphishman420 wrote:
Too long; didn't read. Someone summarize it for me.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
But how?FatherTed wrote:
bose are crap and overpriced etcphishman420 wrote:
Too long; didn't read. Someone summarize it for me.
fuck knows, sound nice enough to me.phishman420 wrote:
But how?FatherTed wrote:
bose are crap and overpriced etcphishman420 wrote:
Too long; didn't read. Someone summarize it for me.
elitist techy stuff i think
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
I always 'assumed' they were good too. But that review was pretty damning.
$1300 Bose speakers contain drivers for $35 a pair and boxes that you would do a better job as doggyboxes.FatherTed wrote:
fuck knows, sound nice enough to me.phishman420 wrote:
But how?FatherTed wrote:
bose are crap and overpriced etc
elitist techy stuff i think
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Meh, i wouldn't go bose because i don't like the look of themFreezer7Pro wrote:
$1300 Bose speakers contain drivers for $35 a pair and boxes that you would do a better job as doggyboxes.FatherTed wrote:
fuck knows, sound nice enough to me.phishman420 wrote:
But how?
elitist techy stuff i think
its a money/sense issue
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
We have a Bose lifestyle system (with the small cube speakers) and while the sound doesn't fill the room in the way I would like, I don't find them bad. Sure, they're way over-priced (something we didn't know at the time of purchase), but the sound in multiple rooms is so easy to use it's almost worth it. We have speakers in 5 rooms, and even my mother has no problem browsing through the CD library, listening to the radio, rip CDs to the library, etc.
They're good for movies, not music, imo.
They're good for movies, not music, imo.
What speakers to chose depends on what you will feed them ... in the mid range there are lots of good all round speakers but you will never get a pair that plays classical and rock with a premium sound, ask around and read some magazines ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Bose.......bwhahahahaha.....
No highs, no lows....must be Bose
The main problem with Bose is that a lot of people have no idea what a good music system actually sounds like, its the same with car audio, many people who shop with us think they have the best setup possible...until they hear mine.
As with everything, it's about educating people as to what is the best. And when people really find out everything there is to know about Bose compared to its rivals its clear that Bose really has no merits.
As with everything, it's about educating people as to what is the best. And when people really find out everything there is to know about Bose compared to its rivals its clear that Bose really has no merits.
Hurrrr I have 20 subwoofers and two 2" tweeters up front it sounds AWESOME durrrrbaggs wrote:
The main problem with Bose is that a lot of people have no idea what a good music system actually sounds like, its the same with car audio, many people who shop with us think they have the best setup possible...until they hear mine.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Yarrr! Moore bass = good sound.... har har har
Yo' shit ain't bumpin' like mine. Too bad it won't fit in the car I have now.baggs wrote:
The main problem with Bose is that a lot of people have no idea what a good music system actually sounds like, its the same with car audio, many people who shop with us think they have the best setup possible...until they hear mine.
As with everything, it's about educating people as to what is the best. And when people really find out everything there is to know about Bose compared to its rivals its clear that Bose really has no merits.
lol bass reflex.phishman420 wrote:
Yo' shit ain't bumpin' like mine. Too bad it won't fit in the car I have now.baggs wrote:
The main problem with Bose is that a lot of people have no idea what a good music system actually sounds like, its the same with car audio, many people who shop with us think they have the best setup possible...until they hear mine.
As with everything, it's about educating people as to what is the best. And when people really find out everything there is to know about Bose compared to its rivals its clear that Bose really has no merits.
http://i339.photobucket.com/albums/n474 … G00281.jpg
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
?Freezer7Pro wrote:
lol bass reflex.phishman420 wrote:
Yo' shit ain't bumpin' like mine. Too bad it won't fit in the car I have now.baggs wrote:
The main problem with Bose is that a lot of people have no idea what a good music system actually sounds like, its the same with car audio, many people who shop with us think they have the best setup possible...until they hear mine.
As with everything, it's about educating people as to what is the best. And when people really find out everything there is to know about Bose compared to its rivals its clear that Bose really has no merits.
http://i339.photobucket.com/albums/n474 … G00281.jpg