DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6433|cuntshitlake

Now it's about time we make this, BF2s OC showoff thread. This "competition" is split in two separate tables, the max OC speed table and the max OC % table. To get your OC on the table post a screenshot of your CPU-Z main screen showing your overclock (get CPU-Z here). This is not a stability competition, the fact that you have booted to Windows is enough of a stability proof. If same speed/percentace appears, AMD wins and then cheaper CPU wins.

You do not have to post anything else, I will automatically add you to both tables and count your OC %. Everyone can post max 3 results, one per CPU. If you want your result to be updated, post a new screen and tell it's for the same CPU.

DISCLAIMER! IF YOU DECIDE TO GO SUICIDE RUN FOR RESULTS, I TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY OF DESTROYED HARDWARE. OVERCLOCK AT YOUR OWN RISK, AND ONLY IF YOU KNOW WHAT DO DO.

Here come the tables:

MAX OC SPEEDMAX OC SPEEDMAX OC SPEEDMAX OC SPEEDMAX OC SPEED
1igE84004.752GHz1.408
2Freezer7ProE74004.725GHz1.670
3maxE84004.700GHz-
4menzo2003E84004.400GHz1.424
5.SupE84004.320GHz1.384
6Freezer7ProE72004.313GHz1.520
7cyborg_ninja-117E85004.275GHz1.440
8The SheriffE85004.256GHz1.368
9IrishGrimReaperE85004.124GHz1.344
10DrykillQ66004.110GHz1.616
11The_Sniper_NME84004.050GHz1.328
12SydneyE85004.010GHz1.376
13GC_PaNzerFINi7 9204.010GHz1.296
14menzo2003Celeron 4304.005GHz1.536
15Little BaBy JESUSE84004.000GHz1.264
16Mitch92uKE84004.000GHz1.368
17DeathUnlimitedQ95504.000GHz1.408
18dalmar72E31103.870GHz1.310
19ghettopersonE65503.780GHz-
20dill13E84003.780GHz1.216
21GC_PaNzerFINE67503.700GHz1.448
22DeathUnlimitedE21803.600GHz1.616
23DeathUnlimitedE66003.600GHz1.620
24aimlessE67503.600GHz1.312
25JussimiesE67003.600GHz1.376
26DefianceE84003.510GHz1.264
27BeduinX68003.500GHz1.368
28GoonersQ94503.496GHz1.248
29GC_PaNzerFINE21803.450GHz1.616
30Moist.NiekE84003.420GHz1.200
31james@alienwareE67003.370GHz1.304
32GC_PaNzerFINQ66003.330GHz1.312
33jsnipyE68503.300GHz1.232
34haffeysucksQ93003.300GHz1.368
35']['error.V2E66003.200GHz1.408
36PoseidonE66003.200GHz1.416
37igE67503.200GHz1.408
38GGF0RCE4800+X23.175GHz1.424
39CodePhoenix6000+X23.150GHz1.184
40bob9f6E63003.150GHz1.360
41CrazeD4800+X23.070GHz1.392
42Scratch[USA]E66003.000GHz1.424
43StimeyQ67003.000GHz1.224
44Naturn5000+X22.912GHz1.232
45B00MH3ADSH0TE63002.800GHz1.136
46MECtallica4000+X22.760GHz1.376
47SwopeE63002.500GHz1.296
48Freezer7Pro2600+2.305GHz1.872
MAX OC %MAX OC %MAX OC %MAX OC %
1menzo2003Celeron 430 1.8GHz @ 4.005GHz122%
2DeathUnlimitedE2180 2.0GHz @ 3.600GHz80%
3GC_PaNzerFINE2180 2.0GHz @ 3.450GHz72.5%
4DrykillQ6600 2.4GHz @ 4.110GHz71.5%
5Freezer7ProE7200 2.53GHz @ 4.313GHz70.5%
6bob9f6E6300 1.86GHz @ 3.150GHz69.5%
7Freezer7ProE7400 2.80GHz @ 4.725GHz69%
8ghettopersonE6550 2.33GHz @ 3.780GHz62%
9igE8400 3.0GHz @ 4.752GHz58.5%
10maxE8400 3.0GHz @ 4.700GHz56.5%
11B00MH3ADSH0TE6300 1.86GHz @ 2.800GHz50.5%
12DeathUnlimitedE6600 2.4GHz @ 3.600GHz50%
13GC_PaNzerFINi7 920 2.66GHz @ 4.010GHz50%
14menzo2003E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.400GHz46.5%
15.SupE8400 3.0GHz @ 4.320GHz44%
16DeathUnlimitedQ9550 2.83GHz @ 4.000GHz41.5%
17GC_PaNzerFINE6750 2.66GHz @ 3.700GHz39%
18GC_PaNzerFINQ6600 2.4GHz @ 3.330GHz39%
19cyborg_ninja-117E8500 3.16GHz @ 4.275GHz37%
20JussimiesE6700 2.66GHz @ 3.600GHz35.5%
21aimlessE6750 2.66GHz @ 3.600GHz35.5%
22The_Sniper_NME8400 3.0GHz @ 4.050GHz35%
23SwopeE6300 2.5GHz @ 2.500GHz34.5%
24The SheriffE8500 3.166GHz @ 4.256GHz34.5%
25']['error.V2E6600 2.4GHz @ 3.200GHz33.5%
26PoseidonE6600 2.4GHz @ 3.200GHz33.5%
27Mitch92uKE8400 3.0GHz @ 4.000GHz33.5%
28Little BaBy JESUSE8400 3.0GHz @ 4.000GHz33.5%
29haffeysucksQ9300 2.5GHz @ 3.300GHz32%
30GoonersQ9450 2.66GHz @ 3.496GHz31.5%
31IrishGrimReaperE8500 3.166GHz @ 4.124GHz30.5%
32dalmar72Xeon E3110 3.0GHz @ 3.870GHz29%
33GGF0RCE4800+X2 2.5GHz @ 3.175GHz27%
34james@alienwareE6700 2.66GHz @ 3.370GHz26.5%
35SydneyE8500 3.166GHz @ 4.010GHz26.5%
36dill13E8400 3.0GHz @ 3.780GHz26%
37Scratch[USA]E6600 2.4GHz @ 3.000GHz25%
38CrazeD4800+X2 2.5GHz @ 3.070GHz23%
39igE6750 2.66GHz @ 3.200GHz20.5%
40Freezer7Pro2600+ 1.917GHz @ 2.305GHz20%
41BeduinX6800 2.93GHz @ 3.500GHz19.5%
42DefianceE8400 3.0GHz @ 3.510GHz17%
43MECtallica4000+ 2.4GHz @ 2.760GHz15%
44Moist.niekE8400 3.0GHz @ 3.420GHz14%
45StimeyQ6700 2.66GHz @ 3.000GHz13%
46Naturn5000+X2 2.6GHz @ 2.912GHz12%
47jsnipyE6850 3.0GHz @ 3.300GHz10%
48CodePhoenix6000+X2 3.0GHz @ 3.150GHz5%

In ranking when the "score" is the same, these rules always apply, in this order: AMD > Intel // Older socket > Newer socket // Single Core > Dualcore > Quadcore // Lower spec'd model > Higher spec'd model.


No credits to Freezer from his table <3

Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2009-02-11 15:00:23)

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6167|Winland

I MADE THE GROUNDS FOR THAT TABLE AND LET DU COPY IT FORM MY SUPERPI THREAD. HE DOESN'T CREDIT ME, SO I CREDIT MYSELF, CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT!
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6433|cuntshitlake

Mah OC

https://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u155/UnlimitedDeath/SPiwin.png
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6619

Dude, you need to correct my entry. Much as I would like a 4.75Ghz OC I can't quite make it.
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|6416|Amsterdam‫
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/3gH.jpg

Last edited by menzo2003 (2009-02-11 14:58:25)

https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|6813|Reykjavík, Iceland.
From superpi thread since my pc died

https://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i194/PBAsydney/Desktop/pimod.jpg

3.5GHz on E6600
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6433|cuntshitlake

Added all from SuperPi thread and Menzo's Celly 430. CPU that is.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5720|شمال
I have an X6800 @ 3.2 Not much
stock cooling FTL!

EDIT:
https://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/Middleeaster/CPUSCORE-1.jpg

Last edited by Beduin (2008-08-16 08:32:39)

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6433|cuntshitlake

Beduin wrote:

I have an X6800 @ 3.2 Not much
stock cooling FTL!
I can add it if you provide a CPU-Z screenshot.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Stimey
­
+786|6090|Ontario | Canada
https://i36.tinypic.com/8x289e.jpg
Actually my Q6700 is at 3.0Ghz
Stupid motherboard D:

Last edited by Stimey (2008-08-16 08:35:01)

­
­
­
­
­
­
i g
Banned
+876|5834|GA

my e6750 sucks and cant get any higher than 3.3. we got my friend's to go to 3.8 in my computer
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6167|Winland

https://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/Freezer7Pro/cpuz2300.png

AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton, stock 1.917GHz. 20% OC. Stupid mobo won't let me set NB voltage, so I can't go over 2.3 stable. It's incredible how mucht he nForce sucks at FSB over 200.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6433|cuntshitlake

Freezer7Pro wrote:

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … uz2300.png

AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton, stock 1.917GHz. 20% OC. Stupid mobo won't let me set NB voltage, so I can't go over 2.3 stable. It's incredible how mucht he nForce sucks at FSB over 200.
Chocolate rain FTW
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6423|The Twilight Zone
I just wanted to say I can never make an 80% OC on air since my CPU has a 45nm structure and it doesn't allow such high vcores. Still nice OC DU and good thread!
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6508|Long Island, New York

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … uz2300.png

AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton, stock 1.917GHz. 20% OC. Stupid mobo won't let me set NB voltage, so I can't go over 2.3 stable. It's incredible how mucht he nForce sucks at FSB over 200.
Chocolate rain FTW
QFT
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6167|Winland

.Sup wrote:

I just wanted to say I can never make an 80% OC on air since my CPU has a 45nm structure and it doesn't allow such high vcores. Still nice OC DU and good thread!
It's because your CPU is 3GHz stock. If it was 2GHz stock, you'd get a much higher % OC.

Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-08-16 13:53:37)

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6423|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

I just wanted to say I can never make an 80% OC on air since my CPU has a 45nm structure and it doesn't allow such high vcores. Still nice OC DU and good thread!
It's because your CPU is 3GHz stock. If it was 2GHz stock, you'd get a much higher % OC.
+ cos of its architecture
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6167|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

I just wanted to say I can never make an 80% OC on air since my CPU has a 45nm structure and it doesn't allow such high vcores. Still nice OC DU and good thread!
It's because your CPU is 3GHz stock. If it was 2GHz stock, you'd get a much higher % OC.
+ cos of its architecture
A 2GHz 45nm can very well do an OC of 3.6GHz. Just look at mine, it's a 45nm dual, a quite poor one, too, that's done a 70% oc on air. On LN2, it's been to 5.3GHz.

It's all about stock speeds, you see. Your CPU runs at 3GHz stock. My CPU, for example, runs at 2.53GHz stock. Clocking my CPU to 3GHz already presents an 18% overclock. My CPU at 3.6 is 49%, whilst your CPU on 3.6 is only overclocked my 20%.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
i g
Banned
+876|5834|GA

i cant tell a difference between 2.66 and 3.2 ghz

i highly doubt any of you can either
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6167|Winland

i g wrote:

i cant tell a difference between 2.66 and 3.2 ghz

i highly doubt any of you can either
That's because 2.66 to 3.2 is nothing. 20%, gimme a break. I run on around 50% for everyday use, and it's certainly a difference. 50% more PPD, heavily increased gaming performance... Yes thank you.

OCing rarely has any effect on stuff like word processing, or things where other pieces of hardware present bottlenecks.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
aimless
Member
+166|6095|Texas

i g wrote:

i cant tell a difference between 2.66 and 3.2 ghz

i highly doubt any of you can either
Try rendering 30 minute video in vegas or 10 min audio in Fl Studio.

My vcore is 1.312v
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6508|Long Island, New York
i was just about to put down my name but then I saw I was on there

yay, i suppose?

oh; and:

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v702/osgood35nyi/New%20Computer/firstOC.jpg

Last edited by Poseidon (2008-08-16 17:03:05)

Ryan
Member
+1,230|6813|Alberta, Canada

I'm still rocking my completely stock E6300 @ 1.86GHz.
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6433|cuntshitlake

Ryan wrote:

I'm still rocking my completely stock E6300 @ 1.86GHz.
Noes, those CPUs are awesome overclockers, it's a waste to leave one @ stock :S
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Defiance
Member
+438|6641

Freezer7Pro wrote:

I MADE THE GROUNDS FOR THAT TABLE AND LET DU COPY IT FORM MY SUPERPI THREAD. HE DOESN'T CREDIT ME, SO I CREDIT MYSELF, CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT!
For a simple table done in, essentially, HTML?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard