@ idea of another Loose Change...
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Oh god, not you people again.cryptofcolumbus wrote:
Do you believe the story the government agencies are telling us, or do you think there is a more sinister plot line below the surface just waiting for some internet sleuths with too much free time on their hands to uncover? Was it a true structural failure, or was it helped along by a well placed pack of explosives?
(it is) BUT MAYBE THAT'S PART OF THE COVER UP TOO.SargeV1.4 wrote:
..i thought the OP was a parody of loose change, making fun of conspiracy theorists by reciting their arguments for this incident with the bridge so as to make them look stupid.
right?
That's what they want you to think.Schwarzelungen wrote:
i think a sinister plot would have involved the golden gate bridge or something else.
Yet another possible use for the billions being pissed away in the middle east.T.Pike wrote:
This is a crisis that most of the country is facing.
cryptofcolumbus wrote:
I must go work. I am a Lead Activist for PETA. I will discuss some of your ideas with a few of my brilliant coworkers while we also save innocent animals, and when I return in a few hours I will bring you my one and final theory. It will probably be presented in a slide show with a crazy celebrity's voice over and vague facts and misinformation. In the meantime, no one drive over any bridges. It's not safe.
O rly ?mcminty wrote:
Yet another possible use for the billions being pissed away in the middle east.T.Pike wrote:
This is a crisis that most of the country is facing.
no doubt...GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
we're not really serious here, are we?
I remember the first time I ever actually stood on a bridge, the Twin Falls bridge in Philadelphia.leetkyle wrote:
Bridges actually expand and contract during the year. Some even contract and expand in excess of +/- one metre or more. They collapse - it happens! They need the upkeep (no pun intended).
no but, you see...Orrish wrote:
OK im tired of this bullshit, the american government wouldn't need to stage another fake terrorist attack, they did that with 9/11 so they could have a fantastic excuse to go into iraq again, i don't know why in the 90's they pulled back after they had those bastards by the balls. so to the original question no no plotted terrorist attack, just a shitty old bridge that fell down due to a freak accident. END OF NOW PLEASE!
What Mcminty is trying to say is that the billions we've spent on a misguided war would have been better spent fixing our aging bridges. He didn't say GWB was to blame for this. Why are you so tense?T.Pike wrote:
O rly ?mcminty wrote:
Yet another possible use for the billions being pissed away in the middle east.T.Pike wrote:
This is a crisis that most of the country is facing.
Another knee-jerk liberal reaction.
Did you read what I said? This problem has been building over DECADES !
I know my employer is the oldest superhighway in America and we have been trying to find alternate funding for Bridge repair since the mid-80s.
Sorry, you can't blame this one on Dub !
Except it takes oil for the cars that justify having a bridge in the first place.Havok wrote:
What Mcminty is trying to say is that the billions we've spent on a misguided war would have been better spent fixing our aging bridges. He didn't say GWB was to blame for this. Why are you so tense?T.Pike wrote:
O rly ?mcminty wrote:
Yet another possible use for the billions being pissed away in the middle east.
Another knee-jerk liberal reaction.
Did you read what I said? This problem has been building over DECADES !
I know my employer is the oldest superhighway in America and we have been trying to find alternate funding for Bridge repair since the mid-80s.
Sorry, you can't blame this one on Dub !