http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company
Hope it isn't true, because that means everyone will ditch BF2142. :\
Hope it isn't true, because that means everyone will ditch BF2142. :\
Pages: 1
Fixed.Fuzzball_the_Shooter wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company
Hope it isn't true, because that means everyone will ditch BF2. :\
Probably something equivalent for Crysis. Kill two birds with one stone. BTW, if that is for PC, is it DX10? It looks like it, but it doesn't say...FFLink13 wrote:
Wow, what kind of computer will be needed to handle that beast?
That's just what the consoles (FTL!) have, we would no doubt get 64 (maybe 100+ depending on DICEA's competence) as we have since 1942.MagiCandy wrote:
only 24 sized multiplayer games...no thanks.
thank GODFuzzball_the_Shooter wrote:
Hope it isn't true, because that means everyone will ditch BF2142. :\
I does. Gears of War is too fun to stop playing.ATG wrote:
Seriously, who plays on a console?
Think crysisFFLink13 wrote:
Wow, what kind of computer will be needed to handle that beast?
MoiATG wrote:
Seriously, who plays on a console?
Think 2008h4hagen wrote:
Think crysisFFLink13 wrote:
Wow, what kind of computer will be needed to handle that beast?
Last edited by Kmarion (2007-02-05 09:20:36)
I do. I enjoy it, more than I do being on my computer.ATG wrote:
Seriously, who plays on a console?
I do,it's quicker and i don't have to download patches and install games.ATG wrote:
Seriously, who plays on a console?
Pages: 1