2.798029 : )
Search
Search results: 28 found, showing up to 50
Eagles over saints, Bears over Seahawks, Eagles over Bears
Eagles against Chargers in superbowl but i cant think of who will win
Eagles against Chargers in superbowl but i cant think of who will win
theres mods for that, just so u know=NHB=Shadow wrote:
maybe a nuke too then sniper would then be awesome
i would also add the ability to open doors, climb out windows to escape if the enemy is coming in through the only entrance and a lot more types of vehiclesCaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
Permission to come aboard - this is my first post.
My friends and i were debating what would be cool for a BF3 kind of game and here are some of our thoughts:
1) concept of NPCs or neutral parties (civilians). These are bots but don't initially carry weapons. They can be men/women/children. if you kill them by accident, you lose fixed number of points (almost like a TK). if your team kills too many, the NPCs turn into an enemy to you and any of them can pick up arms against you. in the case that you kill them while they are armed, you do not lose points. we can argue about how you can win back their respect by perhaps healing them or something (which doesn't give you points for healing but gets them to be friendly again). Either way you don't earn points by killing them. they just act like a thorn in your side (somebody else that wants to kill you).
2) fully (or at least much more) destructible environment. A tank should be able to blow up small buildings or at least punch holes in walls. if you put 4985794578498 c4 packs on the hotel in Jalalabad, it would be cool to see the 30 story building implode. this is extreme but hopefully you can see where i'm going.
3) on the stats front, i think that they should allow multiple medals/awards in some more cases like expert medas for example - should be able to get multiple instances of these. we all know how hard it is to get 20 repair points in a round - why not be rewarded each time you get that. some people probably think it's easy - however i don't.
4) definitely opening the conflict to more than just 2 armies at a time (as was mentioned previously in this thread) would be an interesting dynamic. I guess my first point flows from this as well. you might have the opportunity to form alliances against an enemy.
5) think of ways to improve quality of squad and commander play to make it more enticing to play WITH the team instead of as lone-wolf.
6) maybe a subscription service that would pump out new maps once per month or something.
7) thinking outside the box (and yet probably was also mentioned) we could expand the map to link-up to other maps. maybe if we drove off the edge of karkand, it would connect to another server playing jalalabad or something. this way, we might be able to have a road-sign approach to selecting servers for battle. you could initially start the game in the middle of nowhere with some roadsigns that point to different maps/servers and then either walk/run/drive or fly there - then it connects to that server. following this idea, you could drive off the map and appear back in the middle-of-nowhere with the road-signs to pick another server. might make sense to have this ability only in certain areas of the edge of the map - like roads. it would suck flying off the edge of the map by accident when you didn't mean to, etc.
i don't know, just some ideas we were thinking about. what do you think?
they made it so a new kit appears when u are revived to avoid the people that are revived and get no kit
if ur a sniper u can drop 2 claymores and it should destroy the buggy too
the patch simply fixes the client files for titan mode so the game shouldnt crash due to a faulty file
i try to find a place where i can cover atleast 3 flags
at my school we had 2 moments of silence
30. why do we take the day off from work on "labor" day
112, Sharqi, Sniper
i want 1 please
of course the problem is that in real life a sniper usually has a spotter or someone to protect his spot, in bf2 no one would bother to do sodeeznutz1245 wrote:
The point USMarine was trying to make is that it should be like real life. I to am a Marine (a real one) and claymore mines are not used by snipers. Engineers and specops would use them in a real life combat theatre.RDMC(2) wrote:
But explain me, what use does it have for a engineer to have a Claymore? Can't figure that out..usmarine2005 wrote:
Yes, and they used to be destructible also. I think the Engineers should have them, just like their real life counter parts. Now don't jump on me about real life shit, I mean does AT carry a sniper rifle?
"What? You pooped in the refrigerator? And you ate the whole... wheel of cheese? How'd you do that? Heck, I'm not even mad; that's amazing. How 'bout we get you in your p.j.'s and we hit the hay."
anchorman: the legend of ron burgundy
anchorman: the legend of ron burgundy
tbh theres always gonna be the people who continue to play bf2 because they dont want to move on to another game and they are probably still gonna complain about bf2
either stairway to heaven by led zep or...
tom sawyer by rush
tom sawyer by rush
"France have the largest army in Europe.
"we saved you plenty of times ex. WWI, WWII not to mention we helped with vietnam"
Very inaccurate - WWI the US were hardly involved at all, they provided artillery and naval support to the British and French but refused to provide reinforcements - unless you were black, in which case you'd be shipped off to the French frontlines. - WWII the US stayed out of until the last minute, but were very helpful when they did get involved - Vietnam???? The French were long gone by the time the US did anything in Vietnam. The communist gorvernment (which is what the US went into Vietnam to overthrow) was only established after the departure of the French.
first of all size doesnt make a difference if the army cant complete its objective which brings up both world wars, if the US hadnt supported the french and british then germany could have won afterall that was the closest war in history, also in WW2 americans made all the difference had the US hadnt sided with the brits then the war would have seen the destruction of great britain mainly since the military would have still been desimated, therefore no france
finally in vietnam the french came to the americans for help and pulled out too early, the US still did its job
"we saved you plenty of times ex. WWI, WWII not to mention we helped with vietnam"
Very inaccurate - WWI the US were hardly involved at all, they provided artillery and naval support to the British and French but refused to provide reinforcements - unless you were black, in which case you'd be shipped off to the French frontlines. - WWII the US stayed out of until the last minute, but were very helpful when they did get involved - Vietnam???? The French were long gone by the time the US did anything in Vietnam. The communist gorvernment (which is what the US went into Vietnam to overthrow) was only established after the departure of the French.
first of all size doesnt make a difference if the army cant complete its objective which brings up both world wars, if the US hadnt supported the french and british then germany could have won afterall that was the closest war in history, also in WW2 americans made all the difference had the US hadnt sided with the brits then the war would have seen the destruction of great britain mainly since the military would have still been desimated, therefore no france
finally in vietnam the french came to the americans for help and pulled out too early, the US still did its job
truthfully the psp isnt that great, the games suck cause of the layout and they already lost support of the movie companies and besides since i bought the psp ive only played and liked 3 games while with the ds i have atleast 50 games i play on their all the timeericcartmanisbest wrote:
P.S actually one thing u didnt list, but isnt a proper console, i want a PSP!! still havent got one dammit, lol
truthfully we were better of attacking a country that posed a threat to us sooner such as saudi arabia or iran, afterall most of our enemys in iraq are from the other middle eastern countriesphnxfrhwk wrote:
I firmly believe going to Iraq wasn't a mistake. Why we went there and why we are still there is a mistake. Saddam needed to be overthrown. He ran that country into the ground toilet paper was worth more than the printed money. Not to mention the torturous dictatorship he had going on there. Why nobody else sees that I'm not sure. But then again the media doesn't cover the stories about what life was like before we went there. With Saddam sending missiles into cities and other atrocities. Sure WMDs were never found but still that country needed a change. And since we are over there now we cant just leave until everything is settled. Otherwise it would just be utter chaos and turmoil for the population of Iraq. Soldiers over there now didn't just up and say lets go invade Iraq they are just there trying to help in a country where the extremist few don't want them there.
well thats just some proof of men's stupidity
the insurgents claim allah is on their side
same with muslim terrorists
christians die in the name of jesus on both sides of conflicts and of course the whole idea that leaders are appointed by god
the insurgents claim allah is on their side
same with muslim terrorists
christians die in the name of jesus on both sides of conflicts and of course the whole idea that leaders are appointed by god
its not like the democrats are any better the problem is that everyone but a select few that run the country have no idea what people really want and is best for the country, also if any french people read this tell me why u all seem to hate america after we saved you plenty of times ex. WWI, WWII not to mention we helped with vietnam which would have been a victory if not for the politicszombiguy wrote:
It's the blind def and dumb republicans, they tried to get Clinton out and keep this idiot insergeriver wrote:
What you said is almost perfect, except I don't hate America, I only don't like all the stuff you mention before 'bout this administration. I always admired Bill Clinton for being such a good president, and he was a true american. I couldn't believe they wanted to impeach him for a blow job and Bush is still playing the game. So, I don't think most of the world hates America, it's exactly what you said.CommieChipmunk wrote:
Well personally, if I weren't an American I would probably hate America because our leaders are so... inadequate.. So I reason that if most of the world is like me, and don't like crummy leaders, then they probably wouldn't take too kindly to America. Our foreign policy isn't anything to brag about either though.
running headshots are easy with the L96 ive even shot a driver at full speed from behind about 300 meters away
pepsi just bought mountain dew to counter some of cokes flavorstravisb05 wrote:
who makes moutain DEW pepsi who makes dr.pepper pepsi. who makes diet pepsi not coke
coke all the way, pepsi just copied the formula besides the worldwide choice is and always has been coke
other than terrorists i would have to kill hillary clinton