Just the kind of annoying over generalization and ignorance from the left thats been going on since 2002. The cover should have read:
Democrats promise to be more moderate so they don't lose power in 2 years.
What should sum things up is you guys should try to be a little less partisan, just like the right should.
Democrats promise to be more moderate so they don't lose power in 2 years.
What should sum things up is you guys should try to be a little less partisan, just like the right should.
Last edited by AlbertWesker[RE] (2006-11-10 12:12:16)
ZOMG ... Richard Parker talks about Gene Spelring's RX
liberal intelligence=oxymoron
I honestly find this over generalization true.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Just the kind of annoying over generalization
You're free to do so, but that doesn't make you very well balanced or intelligent, I mean honestly, you guys having been spewing hate since 2002, when will it stop, I hope it will now. Thanks...teddy..jimmy wrote:
I honestly find this over generalization true.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Just the kind of annoying over generalization
yes it will stop now that the Bush administration has lost power over congress. How does this prove that I'm unbalanced or not intelligent. The simplicity of this article can easily be compared to the achievements of the current government.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
You're free to do so, but that doesn't make you very well balanced or intelligent, I mean honestly, you guys having been spewing hate since 2002, when will it stop, I hope it will now. Thanks...teddy..jimmy wrote:
I honestly find this over generalization true.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Just the kind of annoying over generalization
PFFT. Issues? What issues? All that people are doing are arguing back and forth, trying to make their opponents look bad. "omgliberal" "omgneocon" "omgwtfbbq[badinsulthere]". How about we get to the important stuff?
omgomgk30dxedle wrote:
. "omgliberal" "omgneocon" "omgwtfbbq[badinsulthere]".
Answer me this than, did the right so heavily scrutinize Clinton, to the point of HATRED?? Not even close to the scale that has happened to Bush, not even close...teddy..jimmy wrote:
yes it will stop now that the Bush administration has lost power over congress. How does this prove that I'm unbalanced or not intelligent. The simplicity of this article can easily be compared to the achievements of the current government.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
You're free to do so, but that doesn't make you very well balanced or intelligent, I mean honestly, you guys having been spewing hate since 2002, when will it stop, I hope it will now. Thanks...teddy..jimmy wrote:
I honestly find this over generalization true.
Frankly, right now, I see a lot of people blaming everything on Clinton.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Answer me this than, did the right so heavily scrutinize Clinton, to the point of HATRED?? Not even close to the scale that has happened to Bush, not even close...teddy..jimmy wrote:
yes it will stop now that the Bush administration has lost power over congress. How does this prove that I'm unbalanced or not intelligent. The simplicity of this article can easily be compared to the achievements of the current government.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
You're free to do so, but that doesn't make you very well balanced or intelligent, I mean honestly, you guys having been spewing hate since 2002, when will it stop, I hope it will now. Thanks.
A lot of people blaming everything on Clinton. Hardly.k30dxedle wrote:
Frankly, right now, I see a lot of people blaming everything on Clinton.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Answer me this than, did the right so heavily scrutinize Clinton, to the point of HATRED?? Not even close to the scale that has happened to Bush, not even close...teddy..jimmy wrote:
yes it will stop now that the Bush administration has lost power over congress. How does this prove that I'm unbalanced or not intelligent. The simplicity of this article can easily be compared to the achievements of the current government.
I exaggerated. Bite me.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
A lot of people blaming everything on Clinton. Hardly.k30dxedle wrote:
Frankly, right now, I see a lot of people blaming everything on Clinton.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Answer me this than, did the right so heavily scrutinize Clinton, to the point of HATRED?? Not even close to the scale that has happened to Bush, not even close.
Anyone notice theres a story on that front page by a Robert COCKBURN. Just made me giggle lol!
A lot, and know, I haven't had my tetanus booster. But seriously, cmon, you can't say that Clinton was scrutinized as much, you just can't. I'm just amazed at the AMOUNT of hatred from the left, that I have personally seen on my college campus. For instance, when talking to someone, Someone asked me if I was conservative, I said yeah, wanna talk about something, do some intelligent debate, and they roll their eyes at me and call me an idiot and a fool. Thanks, real respectful.k30dxedle wrote:
I exaggerated. Bite me.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
A lot of people blaming everything on Clinton. Hardly.k30dxedle wrote:
Frankly, right now, I see a lot of people blaming everything on Clinton.
Here's the difference, at least for me, I would NEVER call someone stupid solely based on their political affiliation.
He's right, we are just retards who can't do anything but cry.kr@cker wrote:
liberal intelligence=oxymoron
No one said anything about hatred here
Very true. Personally I'm mostly liberal and even I'm amazed at this crap.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
A lot, and know, I haven't had my tetanus booster. But seriously, cmon, you can't say that Clinton was scrutinized as much, you just can't. I'm just amazed at the AMOUNT of hatred from the left, that I have personally seen on my college campus. For instance, when talking to someone, Someone asked me if I was conservative, I said yeah, wanna talk about something, do some intelligent debate, and they roll their eyes at me and call me an idiot and a fool. Thanks, real respectful.k30dxedle wrote:
I exaggerated. Bite me.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
A lot of people blaming everything on Clinton. Hardly.
Here's the difference, at least for me, I would NEVER call someone stupid solely based on their political affiliation.
Good, you should, because you need to bring more moderation to the left, otherwise come 08, its gonna be hard times for Dems. I think you guys should really push to make this country better, BUT NOT because "Bush fuxed it up" or some bullshit. Gimme a break on that stuff. Good post dxedle.k30dxedle wrote:
Very true. Personally I'm mostly liberal and even I'm amazed at this crap.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
A lot, and know, I haven't had my tetanus booster. But seriously, cmon, you can't say that Clinton was scrutinized as much, you just can't. I'm just amazed at the AMOUNT of hatred from the left, that I have personally seen on my college campus. For instance, when talking to someone, Someone asked me if I was conservative, I said yeah, wanna talk about something, do some intelligent debate, and they roll their eyes at me and call me an idiot and a fool. Thanks, real respectful.k30dxedle wrote:
I exaggerated. Bite me.
Here's the difference, at least for me, I would NEVER call someone stupid solely based on their political affiliation.
tell me, which dem has the most potential to become a good president
Thanks. One of my classmates wants "Hillary for '08" and for the left to be, well, uber-left. Um...wtf? From what I've heard, 45% of the US consider themselves moderate. Democrats need to go to the center and cut the Bush stuff to stand any chance in the Presidential elections.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Good, you should, because you need to bring more moderation to the left, otherwise come 08, its gonna be hard times for Dems. I think you guys should really push to make this country better, BUT NOT because "Bush fuxed it up" or some bullshit. Gimme a break on that stuff. Good post dxedle.k30dxedle wrote:
Very true. Personally I'm mostly liberal and even I'm amazed at this crap.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
A lot, and know, I haven't had my tetanus booster. But seriously, cmon, you can't say that Clinton was scrutinized as much, you just can't. I'm just amazed at the AMOUNT of hatred from the left, that I have personally seen on my college campus. For instance, when talking to someone, Someone asked me if I was conservative, I said yeah, wanna talk about something, do some intelligent debate, and they roll their eyes at me and call me an idiot and a fool. Thanks, real respectful.
Here's the difference, at least for me, I would NEVER call someone stupid solely based on their political affiliation.
I believe that if Hillary Clinton becomes president the government would just become fucked up
Definitely not Hilary, the way things are going if Obama wants it, he's going to have the party behind him...teddy..jimmy wrote:
tell me, which dem has the most potential to become a good president
Last edited by AlbertWesker[RE] (2006-11-10 12:43:27)
Wow you guys are a lot less left than I previously thought, I commend you both on your moderation and denouncing Hilary, because she is DEFINITELY the wrong direction for the country. Nothing to do with Gender BTW.....
I think you guys are going to put up Obama, because he is definitely moderate but is HIDING a lot of his values on key issues for the very reason of staying moderate.
I think you guys are going to put up Obama, because he is definitely moderate but is HIDING a lot of his values on key issues for the very reason of staying moderate.
I say bring some fresh blood and ideas into the government.