Intel Pentium 2142
AMD didn't make it through the 21st century in one piece...
AMD didn't make it through the 21st century in one piece...
Last edited by propyl (2006-11-02 19:58:17)
What you're forgetting is that other multiplayer games that include progression, stats tracking etc. have the one-off purchase fee and then monthly subscriptions. If you don't want the advertising, perhaps you'd be willing to pay a $12.99 monthly sub instead?propyl wrote:
Well as long as everyone realizes that by saying "well its not that bad" just means that the next game will have twice as much and collect more information because you put up with it the first time. To top it off why the hell are we being subjected to advertising without it offsetting the cost of the game? Last I checked, I paid almost $50.00 bucks for the game... Do I get it for half price because I have to be subjected to mindless almost subliminal advertising while I game to escape the real world? It's all and well now, but it'll only get worse from here. Next damn game will just steal my wallet and reboot my damn machine endlessly, and since it'll be an EA/DICE product itll only steal my wallet sometimes, and ill get 1 reboot out of 4 tries. Seriously though, we shouldnt put up with in game adds unless it offsets the price of the game. Afterall I am sure EA doesnt plan to hire more talented coders with the extra income from ads. If they are going to ad pack this shit then I better be able to play the shit for free on Yahoo Games bitches!
Hah, I'll keep buying AMD...
real/first and only one I've seen, odd thing is only one guy I play with says he's seen it the rest say they still see the the ER* or whatever image where I see the Intel one.Madiz wrote:
I havent seen anything like that is this fake??
Apparently no one told them I already have the 6800..lol
Enjoy living in the past.Hah, I'll keep buying AMD...
Last edited by Kmarion (2006-11-03 11:23:40)
Actually, I have no problem with the ads... my problem is the fact that to play I have to move my computer into the DMZ for my router so that the EA Master Server can ping me for my IP and info so they make the ads specific to me and my location.Chief_(OwNaGe) wrote:
are those the in game ads people were complaining about?
they aren't bad enough to not buy the game because of it
Let me point you to a game called Battlefield 2. Let me point you to a thing called Prices for BF2 Ranked Servers. Let me point you to a thing called EA gets a royalty from Ranked Server fees. BF2 had pretty good stats tracking (updating could've been faster, but it was fun waking up to another 800 points) and there were no ads. Only expensive servers.aardfrith wrote:
What you're forgetting is that other multiplayer games that include progression, stats tracking etc. have the one-off purchase fee and then monthly subscriptions. If you don't want the advertising, perhaps you'd be willing to pay a $12.99 monthly sub instead?
Advertising to off-set the cost of a game is nothing new. Other games have brand names as well as advertising and still cost more than this did.
I think that even though the ads aren't THAT intrusive this time, it doesn't mean it will stay like that. Before you know it, there will be a constant scrolling ticker at the bottom of the screen (IN GAME) that will be stuffed full of ViAgrA ads and some online pharmacy links. It's more the principal than anything. And if they are going to be ballsy enough to monitor your online activity and put ads in your game, then they should get their shit together and figure out what they are gonna do with the stats feed BEFORE releasing the game.aardfrith wrote:
What you're forgetting is that other multiplayer games that include progression, stats tracking etc. have the one-off purchase fee and then monthly subscriptions. If you don't want the advertising, perhaps you'd be willing to pay a $12.99 monthly sub instead?propyl wrote:
Well as long as everyone realizes that by saying "well its not that bad" just means that the next game will have twice as much and collect more information because you put up with it the first time. To top it off why the hell are we being subjected to advertising without it offsetting the cost of the game? Last I checked, I paid almost $50.00 bucks for the game... Do I get it for half price because I have to be subjected to mindless almost subliminal advertising while I game to escape the real world? It's all and well now, but it'll only get worse from here. Next damn game will just steal my wallet and reboot my damn machine endlessly, and since it'll be an EA/DICE product itll only steal my wallet sometimes, and ill get 1 reboot out of 4 tries. Seriously though, we shouldnt put up with in game adds unless it offsets the price of the game. Afterall I am sure EA doesnt plan to hire more talented coders with the extra income from ads. If they are going to ad pack this shit then I better be able to play the shit for free on Yahoo Games bitches!
Advertising to off-set the cost of a game is nothing new. Other games have brand names as well as advertising and still cost more than this did.
Last edited by bEAv3D (2006-11-03 12:04:09)
Apparently you haven't seen the new tech AMD is rolling out with. Quad-core, 40-micron processors. Noice shit, IMO. Intel is always a step behind the best.Kmarion wrote:
Enjoy living in the past.Hah, I'll keep buying AMD...
Welcome to the club..destruktion_6143 wrote:
but i already have a core 2 duo....
Last edited by Kmarion (2006-11-03 16:49:41)
What you are forgetting is that in order to have a ranked server, you have to pay extra for it. The extra cost goes to EA.aardfrith wrote:
What you're forgetting is that other multiplayer games that include progression, stats tracking etc. have the one-off purchase fee and then monthly subscriptions. If you don't want the advertising, perhaps you'd be willing to pay a $12.99 monthly sub instead?propyl wrote:
Well as long as everyone realizes that by saying "well its not that bad" just means that the next game will have twice as much and collect more information because you put up with it the first time. To top it off why the hell are we being subjected to advertising without it offsetting the cost of the game? Last I checked, I paid almost $50.00 bucks for the game... Do I get it for half price because I have to be subjected to mindless almost subliminal advertising while I game to escape the real world? It's all and well now, but it'll only get worse from here. Next damn game will just steal my wallet and reboot my damn machine endlessly, and since it'll be an EA/DICE product itll only steal my wallet sometimes, and ill get 1 reboot out of 4 tries. Seriously though, we shouldnt put up with in game adds unless it offsets the price of the game. Afterall I am sure EA doesnt plan to hire more talented coders with the extra income from ads. If they are going to ad pack this shit then I better be able to play the shit for free on Yahoo Games bitches!
Advertising to off-set the cost of a game is nothing new. Other games have brand names as well as advertising and still cost more than this did.