Talon
Stop reading this and look at my post
+341|6779
Intel Pentium 2142

AMD didn't make it through the 21st century in one piece...
propyl
Member
+11|6718
Well as long as everyone realizes that by saying "well its not that bad" just means that the next game will have twice as much and collect more information because you put up with it the first time. To top it off why the hell are we being subjected to advertising without it offsetting the cost of the game? Last I checked, I paid almost $50.00 bucks for the game... Do I get it for half price because I have to be subjected to mindless almost subliminal advertising while I game to escape the real world? It's all and well now, but it'll only get worse from here. Next damn game will just steal my wallet and reboot my damn machine endlessly, and since it'll be an EA/DICE product itll only steal my wallet sometimes, and ill get 1 reboot out of 4 tries. Seriously though, we shouldnt put up with in game adds unless it offsets the price of the game. Afterall I am sure EA doesnt plan to hire more talented coders with the extra income from ads. If they are going to ad pack this shit then I better be able to play the shit for free on Yahoo Games bitches!

Last edited by propyl (2006-11-02 19:58:17)

Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6726|67.222.138.85
It could defintely be worse...*thinks of spawn's ad and goes into convulsions*
tefI0n
Temporary Messiah
+14|6416|Kalamazoo, MI
I'd like to see AMD ads, actually.
aardfrith
Δ > x > ¥
+145|6811

propyl wrote:

Well as long as everyone realizes that by saying "well its not that bad" just means that the next game will have twice as much and collect more information because you put up with it the first time. To top it off why the hell are we being subjected to advertising without it offsetting the cost of the game? Last I checked, I paid almost $50.00 bucks for the game... Do I get it for half price because I have to be subjected to mindless almost subliminal advertising while I game to escape the real world? It's all and well now, but it'll only get worse from here. Next damn game will just steal my wallet and reboot my damn machine endlessly, and since it'll be an EA/DICE product itll only steal my wallet sometimes, and ill get 1 reboot out of 4 tries. Seriously though, we shouldnt put up with in game adds unless it offsets the price of the game. Afterall I am sure EA doesnt plan to hire more talented coders with the extra income from ads. If they are going to ad pack this shit then I better be able to play the shit for free on Yahoo Games bitches!
What you're forgetting is that other multiplayer games that include progression, stats tracking etc. have the one-off purchase fee and then monthly subscriptions.  If you don't want the advertising, perhaps you'd be willing to pay a $12.99 monthly sub instead?

Advertising to off-set the cost of a game is nothing new.  Other games have brand names as well as advertising and still cost more than this did.
jsnipy
...
+3,276|6541|...

they should get the stats and award retention working first
Madiz
is back
+26|6775
I havent seen anything like that is this fake??
https://i524.photobucket.com/albums/cc328/Madiz991/signa.jpg
seymorebutts443
Ready for combat
+211|6614|Belchertown Massachusetts, USA
i get these but i dont notice because im too busy killing and playin the game
SkoobyDu
'CLICK JOIN NOW'... OK lets go... BOOM!!!! =FFS=
+120|6580|Cheshire, UK
The thing is I don't know why we should have to pay for this game when EA will be raking in millions from advertising revenue. I would not have a problem with the ADS if they were EA products, other games for example.

An example - ITV, Channel 4 & 5 in the UK its completely funded by advertising so we don't have to pay for the use of TV to watch those channels, however BBC channels are paid for with the TV license because there are NO adverts.

I think its safe to say EA have had there cake and eaten it.
HM1{N}
Member
+86|6663|East Coast via Los Angeles, CA
Hah, I'll keep buying AMD...
heggs
Spamalamadingdong
+581|6407|New York
^^^  me too.
Remember Me As A Time Of Day
TehMyke
8======D
+343|6728

Madiz wrote:

I havent seen anything like that is this fake??
real/first and only one I've seen, odd thing is only one guy I play with says he's seen it the rest say they still see the the ER* or whatever image where I see the Intel one.
» You guys are all old and wrinkly now, GG... | Steam | teHmyke.com | YouTube
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6619|132 and Bush

Apparently no one told them I already have the 6800..lol

Hah, I'll keep buying AMD...
Enjoy living in the past.

Last edited by Kmarion (2006-11-03 11:23:40)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
Mexanick
Member
+3|6472|Russia
I think they should do a 2142-style ads. Not just simply copy a real-world posters into game.
SGT_Squirtle
Member
+13|6734

Chief_(OwNaGe) wrote:

are those the in game ads people were complaining about?

they aren't bad enough to not buy the game because of it
Actually, I have no problem with the ads... my problem is the fact that to play I have to move my computer into the DMZ for my router so that the EA Master Server can ping me for my IP and info so they make the ads specific to me and my location.

They can put all the Intel, NVIDIA and ATI ads in the game they want I just don't like the fact that I have to open my PC up to attack to play.
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|6649|Washington, DC

aardfrith wrote:

What you're forgetting is that other multiplayer games that include progression, stats tracking etc. have the one-off purchase fee and then monthly subscriptions.  If you don't want the advertising, perhaps you'd be willing to pay a $12.99 monthly sub instead?

Advertising to off-set the cost of a game is nothing new.  Other games have brand names as well as advertising and still cost more than this did.
Let me point  you to a game called Battlefield 2. Let me point you to a thing called Prices for BF2 Ranked Servers. Let me point you to a thing called EA gets a royalty from Ranked Server fees. BF2 had pretty good stats tracking (updating could've been faster, but it was fun waking up to another 800 points) and there were no ads. Only expensive servers.
bEAv3D
Member
+24|6713|Fayettenam, NC USA

aardfrith wrote:

propyl wrote:

Well as long as everyone realizes that by saying "well its not that bad" just means that the next game will have twice as much and collect more information because you put up with it the first time. To top it off why the hell are we being subjected to advertising without it offsetting the cost of the game? Last I checked, I paid almost $50.00 bucks for the game... Do I get it for half price because I have to be subjected to mindless almost subliminal advertising while I game to escape the real world? It's all and well now, but it'll only get worse from here. Next damn game will just steal my wallet and reboot my damn machine endlessly, and since it'll be an EA/DICE product itll only steal my wallet sometimes, and ill get 1 reboot out of 4 tries. Seriously though, we shouldnt put up with in game adds unless it offsets the price of the game. Afterall I am sure EA doesnt plan to hire more talented coders with the extra income from ads. If they are going to ad pack this shit then I better be able to play the shit for free on Yahoo Games bitches!
What you're forgetting is that other multiplayer games that include progression, stats tracking etc. have the one-off purchase fee and then monthly subscriptions.  If you don't want the advertising, perhaps you'd be willing to pay a $12.99 monthly sub instead?

Advertising to off-set the cost of a game is nothing new.  Other games have brand names as well as advertising and still cost more than this did.
I think that even though the ads aren't THAT intrusive this time, it doesn't mean it will stay like that.  Before you know it, there will be a constant scrolling ticker at the bottom of the screen (IN GAME) that will be stuffed full of ViAgrA ads and some online pharmacy links.  It's more the principal than anything.  And if they are going to be ballsy enough to monitor your online activity and put ads in your game, then they should get their shit together and figure out what they are gonna do with the stats feed BEFORE releasing the game.

EDIT:  BF2142 FOR LIFE BEEEATCHES!!!!

Last edited by bEAv3D (2006-11-03 12:04:09)

tefI0n
Temporary Messiah
+14|6416|Kalamazoo, MI

Kmarion wrote:

Hah, I'll keep buying AMD...
Enjoy living in the past.
Apparently you haven't seen the new tech AMD is rolling out with. Quad-core, 40-micron processors. Noice shit, IMO. Intel is always a step behind the best.
MDKThePriest
Member
+6|6581
Wow

You guys really need to stop bitching about the ads
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6619|132 and Bush

destruktion_6143 wrote:

but i already have a core 2 duo....
Welcome to the club..

Hey I got a question, since I pay for a server I rent and they are using it to place ads shouldn't I get kick backs? Laugh first.. then think about it..lol

Last edited by Kmarion (2006-11-03 16:49:41)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
FesterTheMolester
BF2s US Server Admin, IRC>Forums
+157|6659|The Mind Of A Cereal Killer
this is the single greatest marketing scheme ever. Not only will people take time to look at the ads, but they will also post them on forums, giving even more advertising to more people... +1 to EA
dubbs
Member
+105|6650|Lexington, KY

aardfrith wrote:

propyl wrote:

Well as long as everyone realizes that by saying "well its not that bad" just means that the next game will have twice as much and collect more information because you put up with it the first time. To top it off why the hell are we being subjected to advertising without it offsetting the cost of the game? Last I checked, I paid almost $50.00 bucks for the game... Do I get it for half price because I have to be subjected to mindless almost subliminal advertising while I game to escape the real world? It's all and well now, but it'll only get worse from here. Next damn game will just steal my wallet and reboot my damn machine endlessly, and since it'll be an EA/DICE product itll only steal my wallet sometimes, and ill get 1 reboot out of 4 tries. Seriously though, we shouldnt put up with in game adds unless it offsets the price of the game. Afterall I am sure EA doesnt plan to hire more talented coders with the extra income from ads. If they are going to ad pack this shit then I better be able to play the shit for free on Yahoo Games bitches!
What you're forgetting is that other multiplayer games that include progression, stats tracking etc. have the one-off purchase fee and then monthly subscriptions.  If you don't want the advertising, perhaps you'd be willing to pay a $12.99 monthly sub instead?

Advertising to off-set the cost of a game is nothing new.  Other games have brand names as well as advertising and still cost more than this did.
What you are forgetting is that in order to have a ranked server, you have to pay extra for it.  The extra cost goes to EA.
iNeedUrFace4Soup
fuck it
+348|6565
They should be giving us free booster packs for making us look at this bullshit. They don't need the money, they are just greedy whores. They better start hooking us up with good patches and free bonus content or i'm seriously done with EA.
https://i.imgur.com/jM2Yp.gif

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard