BF2S Forums Its about damn time!

A buddy from my squad played the infantry only 1.4 beta patch and he said that it is awful.  Too many things changed to suit the newbies.  Apparently, you can't go prone anymore at all.  That's gay.

Mekstizzle wrote:

it's going to be a .../sniper's heaven.

killer21 wrote:

A buddy from my squad played the infantry only 1.4 beta patch and he said that it is awful.  Too many things changed to suit the newbies.  Apparently, you can't go prone anymore at all.  That's gay.

not true....but maybe he played on one of those fucked up server the past week? but normaly you should be able to go prone

908741059871059781 wrote:

YOU sir, are the idiot here.

....bla,bla,retarded bla,bla....

I'll keep it dumbed down for your retarded logic here and call myself a "whiner." In reality its being stoked about a new game mode. So fuck off!

Oooh,baby,did I piss you off a little bit with my opinion?

I won't even go into details of the flaws of your claymore-criticism,you won't understand it anyway,just keep running into them.
And your jet whining is equally retarded.

But please,you can't be serious about that:
Being stoked about a new game mode?
Under which fuckin' rock have you been living the last decade?

But hey,as long as infantry only isn't ranked so you whiny pussy can't "pad" your stats without jets and helis I can be happy then - one fucktard less on real BF2 servers.

Last edited by Mj.Blindfisch (2006-08-15 10:44:47)

jens-ond wrote:

mr blindfish i think i love you

Thx,I get that a lot.

I look forward to the new map, but not necessarily the infantry only setting.  It could be nice in some maps.....like maybe Sharqi, Road to Jalalabad, and Karkand.  But even then, I dont mind the choppers on Sharqi and the armor on Karkand.  I just wanna play the new map.

Mr.Unstoppable wrote:

Personally, I won't use this feature.  I think it is just giving in to the whiners who can't stay alive because of "jet, chopper, and tank whores".  The vehicles are probably the most realistic thing in the game because in war there are jets, choppers, and tanks.  Have terrorists called us cheaters because the US uses jets and choppers? NO! DEAL WITH IT OR FIND A DIFFERENT GAME!!!!

They probably have called you cheaters. But the real world can't be argued with.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

BF2 is about the vehicles, if you don't want to get raped by infantry go play CS.

totally different game play, so many fucken spanners post in these forums.

Mr.Unstoppable wrote:

EA is trying to make the game a bit realistic by including equipment used in real life (jets, choppers, and tanks).  BTW if you can't stay alive because of jets and choppers.....play on different maps!  Your stats tell me you are a Karkand whore so just continue on your current path.  All that coming from a guy named.......(well I don't remember the numbers) who has spent 25% of his time in a tank. Just keep playing Karkand and you shouldn't have problems.

Your stats tell me you're retarded at every aspect of this game

908741059871059781 wrote:

Just for shits and giggles, see how long it takes you to  drive your vehicle inside a buildings stairway to eliminate the claymores. Also, get mr. engineer to try creeping up the stairs and diffusing the clay from the front (which would be the only possible way, except some type of glitch or lag out, in which case you would already be past it capping the flag.)

There's something in the game called flagradius.At a certain distance from the flag you are already capping it,no need to hug it.

Amazingly aswell is that there are people who know how to use this properly and just don't run blindly into claymores and whine about them later on.

They are smart (smarter than you!) and look at the flag from a distance first,only enter areas which are claymore-free,slowly inch their way into the flagradius and stay away from hotspots like your stairs.

Btw,on which map do you HAVE TO use a building stairway to capture a flag?
And don't say Palace on Warlord,you can get on the roof with a grappling hook and don't need stairs.
Because the grappling hook can be used by everybody it only takes one antitank or assault and a bit of teamwork.

And hey,yes,you are right about the jeep inside the building,but I never said anything about attempting the jeep-technique indoors.

Yes,there are claymore victims,but nothing what a medic can't fix and if people would take one for the team and then get revived they clear the area (like I already mentioned:the corpse triggers all the other mines while it gets blown away by the initial blast).

Another point:
The flagradius is round(radius,circle,you've probably heard about that in special ed.) and snipers only have 2 claymores.
If you use cover from walls,trees,vehicles,etc. and actually use your brain before charging the flag - how many claymores make a flag absolutely-Fort Knox-uncappable?
Yeah,I know,for you it takes probably only one,but that doesn't make them unfair,there are skilled people too,you know.

So,what is left of your harsh criticism? Nothing!!

Seems that even my retarded logic beats yours...

908741059871059781 wrote:

Jets are invincible to troops on the ground. With the exception of AF wich is better. Its funny how you admit that the reason you know i don't fly is because I'm geeing owned by jets.  Because its pretty obvious that there is nothing that can be done to prevent it on the ground.

908741059871059781 wrote:

Try this...Get enough people on your team to fill every single SAM emplacement in the Gulf of Oman. Then get one average pilot . Okay its every AA vs him. See how many rounds it takes you to take the jet down.

908741059871059781 wrote:

Yep I'm serious about all of it.(...)
In reality its because...you are stupid.

Now for the people with IQs above 1, explain to me how padding is going to be any worse in infantry only? \ I don't see any difference.

Muhahaha,who's the real idiot here?

For example your pussy jet whining:
Yesterday on Wake there was one sinlge guy in an IGLA-site.
Every time he shot down a plane he was like "OMGLOLROFL,x flyboys down!This is so easy!!"
This guy got around 5-7 planes every round,all by himself.
So your team on Golf of Oman must just have been as equally retarded as you are if they can't shoot down one single plane when every stinger-site is manned.Invincible flying machines..bullshit.

And I'll keep it simple for you,as you are obviously one of the people here with an IQ below 1(let me guess,it's 0.908741059871059781,right? :

Your infantry only IS padding if it is going to be ranked.

When you play a map which usually is dominated by jets in infantry only mode you are having an unfair advantage over the people who already got great infantry stats on this map,even with the "invincible flying machines" killing them.

Easy enough for you or do you want me to draw you a sketch?

And if you decide to reply to my post - please think about it first and bring up some facts that prove me wrong rather than just saying that my personal opinion which is based on my gaming experience (how can a opinion be wrong anyways?) is wrong.

Last edited by Mj.Blindfisch (2006-08-16 10:37:23)

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Gawwad wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

BF2 is about the vehicles, if you don't want to get raped by infantry go play CS.

CS infantry combat is nothing like BF2.

That same line you just typed has been seen around 1 billion times on many forums and is simply put stupid.

Don't use it.

Yeah, BF2 is different because you have to deal with tanks/planes/cars/helos/artillery/commanders. Pretty much the only other difference is the noob-friendly prone and the massive advantage of a medic to heal themselves, oh and of course the gaymores that will be god in infantry only.

Oh, I miss read your first post. I don't quite understand how I'm not going to be raped by infantry in CS since all there is, is infantry...

The infantry combat in BF2 and CS are also totally different.
You can keep telling me that they are the same but I don't care since it's your problem...

Mj.Blindfisch wrote:

908741059871059781 wrote:

Just for shits and giggles, see how long it takes you to  drive your vehicle inside a buildings stairway to eliminate the claymores. Also, get mr. engineer to try creeping up the stairs and diffusing the clay from the front (which would be the only possible way, except some type of glitch or lag out, in which case you would already be past it capping the flag.)

There's something in the game called flagradius.At a certain distance from the flag you are already capping it,no need to hug it.

Amazingly aswell is that there are people who know how to use this properly and just don't run blindly into claymores and whine about them later on.

They are smart (smarter than you!) and look at the flag from a distance first,only enter areas which are claymore-free,slowly inch their way into the flagradius and stay away from hotspots like your stairs.

Btw,on which map do you HAVE TO use a building stairway to capture a flag?
And don't say Palace on Warlord,you can get on the roof with a grappling hook and don't need stairs.
Because the grappling hook can be used by everybody it only takes one antitank or assault and a bit of teamwork.

And hey,yes,you are right about the jeep inside the building,but I never said anything about attempting the jeep-technique indoors.

Yes,there are claymore victims,but nothing what a medic can't fix and if people would take one for the team and then get revived they clear the area (like I already mentioned:the corpse triggers all the other mines while it gets blown away by the initial blast).

Another point:
The flagradius is round(radius,circle,you've probably heard about that in special ed.) and snipers only have 2 claymores.
If you use cover from walls,trees,vehicles,etc. and actually use your brain before charging the flag - how many claymores make a flag absolutely-Fort Knox-uncappable?
Yeah,I know,for you it takes probably only one,but that doesn't make them unfair,there are skilled people too,you know.

So,what is left of your harsh criticism? Nothing!!

Seems that even my retarded logic beats yours...

908741059871059781 wrote:

Jets are invincible to troops on the ground. With the exception of AF wich is better. Its funny how you admit that the reason you know i don't fly is because I'm geeing owned by jets.  Because its pretty obvious that there is nothing that can be done to prevent it on the ground.

908741059871059781 wrote:

Try this...Get enough people on your team to fill every single SAM emplacement in the Gulf of Oman. Then get one average pilot . Okay its every AA vs him. See how many rounds it takes you to take the jet down.

908741059871059781 wrote:

Yep I'm serious about all of it.(...)
In reality its because...you are stupid.

Now for the people with IQs above 1, explain to me how padding is going to be any worse in infantry only? \ I don't see any difference.

Muhahaha,who's the real idiot here?

For example your pussy jet whining:
Yesterday on Wake there was one sinlge guy in an IGLA-site.
Every time he shot down a plane he was like "OMGLOLROFL,x flyboys down!This is so easy!!"
This guy got around 5-7 planes every round,all by himself.
So your team on Golf of Oman must just have been as equally retarded as you are if they can't shoot down one single plane when every stinger-site is manned.Invincible flying machines..bullshit.

And I'll keep it simple for you,as you are obviously one of the people here with an IQ below 1(let me guess,it's 0.908741059871059781,right? :

Your infantry only IS padding if it is going to be ranked.

When you play a map which usually is dominated by jets in infantry only mode you are having an unfair advantage over the people who already got great infantry stats on this map,even with the "invincible flying machines" killing them.

Easy enough for you or do you want me to draw you a sketch?

And if you decide to reply to my post - please think about it first and bring up some facts that prove me wrong rather than just saying that my personal opinion which is based on my gaming experience (how can a opinion be wrong anyways?) is wrong.

I'm done with you. You are a nobody that brings nothing...especially to a thread thats primary purpose was to find out if anyone was planning on running a full time infantry only server. You have put alot of thought (as powerless as it may be) and effort into arguing and calling people "padders" for wanting to play infantry only mode. Which, BTW, still hasn't been explained how padding would be any worse in infantry only than it is with vehicles (Its not padding if both teams are equal) That was the worst attempt of an explination I have ever read. In your very same perspective on padding, flying a jet is the worst  form of padding that you could possible do. It really is amazing how far people go out of their way to attempt to flame. You a loser nobody, and you have brought nothing to the table. Congrats

BTW, Warlord hotel (and many others) can easily be covered with 2 claymores. I'm not going to explain it, well, because you are worthless.

Yesterday on this server a friend of this guy in a jet was pwnzerizing everyonone and then this supply crate came down and hit him. Man he was typing all kinds of crazy shitzie3g2x...Whats wrong with this bullshit?

Dude, I said AN AVERAGE pilot. You will never take down any of the good ones. You'll be shooting missles at them until battlefield 3126 comes out.  Even the best infantry doesn't have have NEAR the KDR of a good pilot. If that doesn't seem unbalanced to you, then your opinion IS wrong and you ARE a jackass.

So the question remains, why focus all 3 of your bain cells on a meager attempt to flame?

Mj.Blindficsh wrote:

When you play a map which usually is dominated by jets in infantry only mode you are having an unfair advantage over the people who already got great infantry stats on this map,even with the "invincible flying machines" killing them.

This makes absolutly no sense. Its no real suprise, though.
There is no unfair advantage when neither team has any vehicles and both teams have access to the same tools.

Last edited by 908741059871059781 (2006-08-16 13:48:23)

not sure what this is all about  lol.. but one thing.. and im NOT takin sides.. but one thing i make sure I do before i flame someone or something is make sure my spelling in a certain flaming sentence is correct... also i like to ensure that NO IRONY exists in any flame...

"So the question remains, why focus all 3 of your bain cells on a meager attempt to flame?"

hehehehe

Last edited by Septimius2 (2006-08-16 15:24:23)