do we even need to go into detail? you know what you did.as a country, your shit stinks too.
there is too much to unpack here.Trump suggests canceling music performances at the ‘Great American State Fair’ after several artists back out
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald … wtab-en-us
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrum … 7963376218
I understand Artists are getting “the yips” having to do with their performance on Wednesday, so I am thinking about bringing the Number One Attraction anywhere in the World, the man who gets much larger audiences than Elvis in his prime, and he does so without a guitar, the man who loves our Country more than anyone else, and the man who some say is the Greatest President in History (THE GOAT!), DONALD J. TRUMP, to take the place of these highly paid, Third Rate “Artists,” and give a major speech, rallying the Country forward like I have done ever since being President! Two years ago, the United States was DEAD. Now we have the “HOTTEST” Country anywhere in the World. I don’t want so-called “Artists” that get paid far too much money, who aren’t happy. I only want to be surrounded by Happy People, Smart People, Successful People, and People that know how to WIN. So, by copy of this TRUTH, I am ordering my Representatives to look at the feasibility of doing an AMERICA IS BACK Rally on Wednesday, Washington, D.C., same time, same location. Only Great Patriots invited — It will be a Wild and Beautiful Celebration of America! President DONALD J. TRUMP
OK, but Australia has moved on.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
do we even need to go into detail? you know what you did.as a country, your shit stinks too.
unnamednewbie13 wrote:
scott morrison
Dilbert_X wrote:
If the PM ever did anything more ambitious than float in a dam we'd know something was up and replace him.
The system works.wikipedia wrote:
The government was defeated at the 2022 election and Morrison stepped down as leader of the Liberal Party
it's curious that all the anglo countries specifically have similar structural problems. mostly boomer-coded, e.g. rampant property prices and stagnant social mobility. plenty of other countries in the world have no problem with simply building more homes to accommodate changes in population or demand. the anglo countries all share the same neurotic attachment to house prices going zoom forever so that some mythical financial security deriving from an infinitely appreciable asset comes into view.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
i've talked about america's problems plenty. it's a shit country. it's just funny hearing a lowkey racist australian disparage the us for racism. lmao. again, glass houses.
this is what america used to do.uziq wrote:
plenty of other countries in the world have no problem with simply building more homes to accommodate changes in population or demand
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2026-06-10 23:01:25)
just to clarify, i don't actually think it's a great idea to go pyro on your workplace. but the reactions to it i've seen are far more in support than they'd have been in the 90s, i think. more violence in general would suck for a lot of people and kill a lot of innocents. but rich people are already immiserating and doing violence to the poors wholesale. not exactly the picture of innocence. these guillotine memes didn't just come out of nowhere.The issue I have with the violent anti corporate stuff
that was true when houses were being built and people could afford one.there are still many people in the lower classes who don't have the civic virtue necessary to build a nice society after all of the billionaires are killed.
Europeans generally don't want to live in one heaving, sweating mass, they like space and peace and quiet, not everything turned into 100 floor Mega-City high-rises.uziq wrote:
plenty of other countries in the world have no problem with simply building more homes to accommodate changes in population or demand.
the europeans don't suffer with housing shortages and problems in the same way that anglo countries do. the 'englishman's home is his castle' syndrome afflicts anglo countries most of all.Dilbert_X wrote:
Europeans generally don't want to live in one heaving, sweating mass, they like space and peace and quiet, not everything turned into 100 floor Mega-City high-rises.uziq wrote:
plenty of other countries in the world have no problem with simply building more homes to accommodate changes in population or demand.
Britain did not have the farmland to feed itself in WW2, unlimited growth is not sustainable.
i suspect this had more to do with autarky and the sudden harrassing of seaborne trade by the germans, not the fact that england was maxing out its malthusian capacity. you love that claptrap. on the contrary, britain embarked on one of the biggest house-building sprees in its history in the immediate wake of ww2. that's rather where this modern myth of home ownership began for the vast majority of the population.Britain did not have the farmland to feed itself in WW2, unlimited growth is not sustainable.
Last edited by uziq (2026-06-14 07:35:25)
