The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
This forum sucks now. Five years ago I would have been flamed for 3 straight pages by the left for what I wrote earlier. We should challenge another online forum to a debate just so I can find some new beret wearing, latte sipping, fake glasses wearing hipsters to fuck with.
Malloy must go
5 years ago, this forum had moderation. it needed it, because there were more users.deeznutz1245 wrote:
This forum sucks now.
uzique is the last bastion of hipster, and if this post doesn't bring him back, well - you'll have to settle for Dilbert, who owns a gun.deeznutz1245 wrote:
just so I can find some new beret wearing, latte sipping, fake glasses wearing hipsters to fuck with.
Last edited by Steve-0 (2013-08-19 18:34:50)
I don't mind Dilbert. I doubt we vote for the same guy every four years but he seems more of the type to voice himself and leave others alone rather than the type who pushes their agenda. I can deal with differences, its part of co-existing. I cant stand people who think they know whats best for me and the money I earn. I guess its like, he's an asshole but he's our asshole kind of thing.
Edit**- but Uzique can suck a dick.
Edit**- but Uzique can suck a dick.
Last edited by deeznutz1245 (2013-08-19 18:40:46)
Malloy must go
I'd rather have a big military prepared for anything than have to draft when the time comes to take action.Jay wrote:
Sure they do, they just want a different big government than liberals do. You want your big military, your invasive laws governing peoples' lifestyles, and you want your border secured. Conservatives are huge government when it comes to security, they just don't like their taxes feeding poor people.War Man wrote:
Conservatives don't want big government.Jay wrote:
Except you"re a big government guy.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Why would we need a draft? Who is going to invade us? Mexico? Canada?War Man wrote:
I'd rather have a big military prepared for anything than have to draft when the time comes to take action.Jay wrote:
Sure they do, they just want a different big government than liberals do. You want your big military, your invasive laws governing peoples' lifestyles, and you want your border secured. Conservatives are huge government when it comes to security, they just don't like their taxes feeding poor people.War Man wrote:
Conservatives don't want big government.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
north koreans. havent you ever played the game homefront? gee jay.Jay wrote:
Why would we need a draft? Who is going to invade us? Mexico? Canada?War Man wrote:
I'd rather have a big military prepared for anything than have to draft when the time comes to take action.Jay wrote:
Sure they do, they just want a different big government than liberals do. You want your big military, your invasive laws governing peoples' lifestyles, and you want your border secured. Conservatives are huge government when it comes to security, they just don't like their taxes feeding poor people.
YesJay wrote:
Why would we need a draft? Who is going to invade us? Mexico? Canada?War Man wrote:
I'd rather have a big military prepared for anything than have to draft when the time comes to take action.Jay wrote:
Sure they do, they just want a different big government than liberals do. You want your big military, your invasive laws governing peoples' lifestyles, and you want your border secured. Conservatives are huge government when it comes to security, they just don't like their taxes feeding poor people.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
mexico has been invading for years. the relative strength of Canadas currency has them playing tourist here in record numbers.Jay wrote:
Why would we need a draft? Who is going to invade us? Mexico? Canada?War Man wrote:
I'd rather have a big military prepared for anything than have to draft when the time comes to take action.Jay wrote:
Sure they do, they just want a different big government than liberals do. You want your big military, your invasive laws governing peoples' lifestyles, and you want your border secured. Conservatives are huge government when it comes to security, they just don't like their taxes feeding poor people.
if we build a fence now, it will be to keep us in, not them out.
Canda burnt your whitehouse, and then walked right back to canada
never forget.
never forget.
And New Zealand movies are better than Australia movies.
don't forget all the 1815 babies that resulted from that marchAdams_BJ wrote:
Canda burnt your whitehouse, and then walked right back to canada
never forget.
Last edited by Stubbee (2013-08-20 11:37:05)
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
I nominate me.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I don't mind Dilbert. I doubt we vote for the same guy every four years but he seems more of the type to voice himself and leave others alone rather than the type who pushes their agenda. I can deal with differences, its part of co-existing. I cant stand people who think they know whats best for me and the money I earn. I guess its like, he's an asshole but he's our asshole kind of thing.
Edit**- but Uzique can suck a dick.
Alpha as fuck.
Jesus guys, I didn't know you had me pegged as a hipsterSteve-0 wrote:
5 years ago, this forum had moderation. it needed it, because there were more users.deeznutz1245 wrote:
This forum sucks now.uzique is the last bastion of hipster, and if this post doesn't bring him back, well - you'll have to settle for Dilbert, who owns a gun.deeznutz1245 wrote:
just so I can find some new beret wearing, latte sipping, fake glasses wearing hipsters to fuck with.
Jesus.....
Fuck Israel
my bad. i guess Lady GaGa is mainstream, but with your beret i'm sure you'd fit in . . .
Dancing in his leotard to 'Single Ladies' on youtube was his precursor to hipsterdom.
Last edited by Jaekus (2013-08-21 06:56:45)
Well Harvard weighed in.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/org … online.pdf
Tldr, I'm right they're wrong.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/org … online.pdf
Tldr, I'm right they're wrong.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Taking that.
I leave for about 10 months and I was surprised to see this thread is still well alive.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
half of each page was taken up with citations. Can't they just dedicate some pages to the end.13rin wrote:
Well Harvard weighed in.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/org … online.pdf
Tldr, I'm right they're wrong.
Jaekus wrote:
Dancing in his leotard to 'Single Ladies' on youtube was his precursor to hipsterdom.
Wish so many users would come back. This forum has lost a lot of people, both good and bad, but nonetheless entertaining.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Food for thought:
Illinois Crime Statistics 1960-2012
Texas Crime Statistics 1960-2012
Interestingly enough, the state with tougher gun laws and a lower population has more homicides than the more armed state with more relaxed gun laws. Texas has a homicide per capita of 100,000 of 4.4 where Illinois has a per capita homicide rate of 5.8. While Texas has a higher number of murders, it's population is almost double that of Illinois. Comparatively, a state with an EVEN TOUGHER gun law still has a higher rate, California at 5 per 100k.
Illinois Crime Statistics 1960-2012
Texas Crime Statistics 1960-2012
Interestingly enough, the state with tougher gun laws and a lower population has more homicides than the more armed state with more relaxed gun laws. Texas has a homicide per capita of 100,000 of 4.4 where Illinois has a per capita homicide rate of 5.8. While Texas has a higher number of murders, it's population is almost double that of Illinois. Comparatively, a state with an EVEN TOUGHER gun law still has a higher rate, California at 5 per 100k.