PrivateVendetta wrote:
DrunkFace wrote:
The Hobbit - 6/10
And that's probably being generous. It honestly felt like Jackson was just riding the lotr success and phoning this movie (trilogy) in. The story/script felt very disjointed and hastily put together with little concern for pacing. The visuals looked worse then lotr which is now a decade old. The constant reliance on circumstantial luck rather then skill, guile or inventiveness of the protagonists to escape or overcome obstacles became tiresome. The childish humour felt out of place and some senses (eg. the rock giants) added nothing to the movie and made no sense to be there.
For me, it felt like Jackson has lost the passion and precision to detail he had with lotr and close enough was good enough this time around and it really does show.
As it's been said before, you are aware it was a children's book, right?
Saying that, the Goblin PG violence was the let down for me.
While the novel may be "children's fantasy", I think Mr. Jackson took that too much to heart and intentionally dumbed-down aspects that didn't need it - which felt very reminiscent of Jar-Jar Binks feeling so awkwardly forced and out of place in Episode I. Kids would have still loved the movie if it had kept the slightly darker edge/feel that LotR had...I saw all of those movies in theatres, and there were no shortages of obnoxious children in attendance.
If you are going to take a standard-sized childrens fantasy novel, several hundred pages in length, and turn it into a
trilogy of
3 hour CGI-fests...well, I'm not sure how movies like that could NOT have issues with pacing and lots of useless filler and contrived plot elements tossed in for little added effect.
also,
7 Psychopaths: 7/10
Ultraviolence and black humor. It started dragging for a bit at around 3/4 of the way through the film, but overall it was enjoyable. Walken stole the show for the most part (which I expected), Sam Rockwell was good as usual, and Colin Farrell was actually better than usual.