There are times and places when I don't want to see a boob, esp not of some 20 stone feminazi.
They should get over themselves and move on - to somewhere else.
They should get over themselves and move on - to somewhere else.
Fuck Israel
I still don't think it is right to keep comparing to a penis. One is for sex and peeing, one is for feeding... Breasts stopped being sexual in the cultures that stopped calling them sexual. Penises are still for peeing and sex in those cultures. Just cause we call breasts sex organs doesn't make it so any more than mouths... Which can used for sex purposes, but you don't complain about seeing a woman smile at you while making your Subway sandwich...
In the case of breastfeeding, I really don't think you should compare it do a guy waving his wang around... Now, if you want to compare it to a woman at Walmart with her fat rolls hanging out over her low-riders. Something you might not want to see, but not something any decent person is going to approach and tell her to dress better or leave.
It is how a baby HUMAN eats... Get over it.
In the case of breastfeeding, I really don't think you should compare it do a guy waving his wang around... Now, if you want to compare it to a woman at Walmart with her fat rolls hanging out over her low-riders. Something you might not want to see, but not something any decent person is going to approach and tell her to dress better or leave.
It is how a baby HUMAN eats... Get over it.
watRTHKI wrote:
people dont usually eat in a target
The abstract qualities of the thing aren't really what count. If the law and company are willing to make an exception for uncovered breastfeeding in indecent exposure, mazel tov.HITNRUNXX wrote:
I still don't think it is right to keep comparing to a penis. One is for sex and peeing, one is for feeding... Breasts stopped being sexual in the cultures that stopped calling them sexual. Penises are still for peeing and sex in those cultures. Just cause we call breasts sex organs doesn't make it so any more than mouths... Which can used for sex purposes, but you don't complain about seeing a woman smile at you while making your Subway sandwich...
In the case of breastfeeding, I really don't think you should compare it do a guy waving his wang around... Now, if you want to compare it to a woman at Walmart with her fat rolls hanging out over her low-riders. Something you might not want to see, but not something any decent person is going to approach and tell her to dress better or leave.
It is how a baby HUMAN eats... Get over it.
Yeah they always have those shitty pizza hut chains in the store.
The first thing that assaults my senses in a Target store is the smell of popcorn and cooked pretzels. The next thing I see is the blinding glare of the overhead lights off the overpolished floor. After that, it's either the leather smell of purses or more cooked food.RTHKI wrote:
i dont see it
I think there should be a rule against exposing genitals, with the only exception being peeing if it's done so that others don't see it, but the punishment for pissing shouldn't be registration as a sex-offender but a little fine of maybe $100 if it was done indiscreetly.
Not sure how I feel about breasts though as they aren't sex organs but they should be reasonably covered (nipples hidden).
Such a touchy subject. I have no clue what would be a reasonably appropriate law for the two to be perfectly honest.
Not sure how I feel about breasts though as they aren't sex organs but they should be reasonably covered (nipples hidden).
Such a touchy subject. I have no clue what would be a reasonably appropriate law for the two to be perfectly honest.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
1. Phase out legal taboo on breast exposure. Once done:
2. It shouldn't be a government problem. Hand off responsibility to the companies to decide whether or not what kind of breastfeeding (covered or uncovered, if any) they want to allow within the concealed (or not) confines of their premises. If it isn't visible from outside, it shouldn't be the government (or anyone else's) problem.
3. People violating store policy may be banned at the store's discretion.
4. If breastfeeding women want to change store policy in its favor, they're free to petition the company. Offended parties may do likewise.
Problem solved, though you may have to subsidize Hooters.
2. It shouldn't be a government problem. Hand off responsibility to the companies to decide whether or not what kind of breastfeeding (covered or uncovered, if any) they want to allow within the concealed (or not) confines of their premises. If it isn't visible from outside, it shouldn't be the government (or anyone else's) problem.
3. People violating store policy may be banned at the store's discretion.
4. If breastfeeding women want to change store policy in its favor, they're free to petition the company. Offended parties may do likewise.
Problem solved, though you may have to subsidize Hooters.
Pretty much.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
1. Phase out legal taboo on breast exposure. Once done:
2. It shouldn't be a government problem. Hand off responsibility to the companies to decide whether or not what kind of breastfeeding (covered or uncovered, if any) they want to allow within the concealed (or not) confines of their premises. If it isn't visible from outside, it shouldn't be the government (or anyone else's) problem.
3. People violating store policy may be banned at the store's discretion.
4. If breastfeeding women want to change store policy in its favor, they're free to petition the company. Offended parties may do likewise.
Problem solved, though you may have to subsidize Hooters.
If a woman is feeding her child with her breast, and an onlooker is getting a chubby over it - the onlooker is the one with the problem.
A little discretion is appreciated, of course.
But, really, the ludicrous extreme is going full Sharia law, and making women cover up absolutely everything because the men can't control themselves. You never go full Sharia...
A little discretion is appreciated, of course.
But, really, the ludicrous extreme is going full Sharia law, and making women cover up absolutely everything because the men can't control themselves. You never go full Sharia...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16492490
Breastfed babies 'are more cranky and cry more'
as if we need babies to be more annoying
Breastfed babies 'are more cranky and cry more'
as if we need babies to be more annoying
Dilbert_X wrote:
What legal taboo?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indecent_e … ted_States
Most states exempt breastfeeding mothers from prosecution under these statutes. U.S. Public Law 106-58 Sec. 647. enacted in 1999, specifically provides that "a woman may breastfeed her child at any location in a Federal building or on Federal property, if the woman and her child are otherwise authorized to be present at the location."
The application of state and federal statutes may be modified by judicial precedent.
What I suggested was fairly simple. Deobfuscate matters by phasing out criminal penalty for indecent exposure (of breasts) altogether and let the people/businesses decide based on their own moral codes and not those of a government of already questionable ethics.http://www.legalmann.com/CriminalDefens … osure.aspx
Women are usually arrested for exposing their breasts if they are not breast feeding a child.
That's just fucked up. I've never thought the act of pissing as being somehow sexual in the slightest. Maybe the US judicial system is just full of people with urine fetishesunnamednewbie13 wrote:
You can get a sex offender tag for pissing in public. Why the Occupiers have gotten away with it...
Our sex laws in general are pretty fucked up. Then again, it's hard to find a country with functional ones.Jaekus wrote:
That's just fucked up. I've never thought the act of pissing as being somehow sexual in the slightest. Maybe the US judicial system is just full of people with urine fetishesunnamednewbie13 wrote:
You can get a sex offender tag for pissing in public. Why the Occupiers have gotten away with it...
Well here in Aus if you get caught pissing in public you get charged with... public urination.Turquoise wrote:
Our sex laws in general are pretty fucked up. Then again, it's hard to find a country with functional ones.Jaekus wrote:
That's just fucked up. I've never thought the act of pissing as being somehow sexual in the slightest. Maybe the US judicial system is just full of people with urine fetishesunnamednewbie13 wrote:
You can get a sex offender tag for pissing in public. Why the Occupiers have gotten away with it...
If you get caught committing a sex crime, you get charged with a sex crime.
Confusing the two seems weird. Like a woman revealing her breasts in public would be indecent exposure in the eyes of the law, or fucking awesome to any hetero red blooded male
- globefish23
- sophisticated slacker
- +334|6563|Graz, Austria
Here in Austria, pissing in public is exempt from punishment if it was nature's call and you had no other choice with no toilet around.
Really, who would prefer having someone piss his pants, just to abide law?
Really, who would prefer having someone piss his pants, just to abide law?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan%27s_lawJaekus wrote:
Well here in Aus if you get caught pissing in public you get charged with... public urination.Turquoise wrote:
Our sex laws in general are pretty fucked up. Then again, it's hard to find a country with functional ones.Jaekus wrote:
That's just fucked up. I've never thought the act of pissing as being somehow sexual in the slightest. Maybe the US judicial system is just full of people with urine fetishes
If you get caught committing a sex crime, you get charged with a sex crime.
Confusing the two seems weird. Like a woman revealing her breasts in public would be indecent exposure in the eyes of the law, or fucking awesome to any hetero red blooded male
+
I think they added public urination as a sex crime because of the occasional flasher. God forbid someone sees a penis. The horror!
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Positive reinforcement. What would you do if you got tits every time you made a fuss?RTHKI wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16492490
Breastfed babies 'are more cranky and cry more'
as if we need babies to be more annoying
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
i'm all for it. if i get get a glimpse at a milk swollen tit, fine.
if some rugrat is sucking a tit and not squealing his little lungs out, fine.
win/win
if some rugrat is sucking a tit and not squealing his little lungs out, fine.
win/win
This logic cannot be defeated. +1Ty wrote:
Positive reinforcement. What would you do if you got tits every time you made a fuss?RTHKI wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16492490
Breastfed babies 'are more cranky and cry more'
as if we need babies to be more annoying