I'm hoping for a Special Forces expansion with all the BF2:SF maps and vehicles ect.
Grapple Hook and Zipline fuck yeah
Grapple Hook and Zipline fuck yeah
Pages: 1 … 227 228 229 230 231 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6975
Arctic Sea battle. Carrier vs. carrier. That would be it.
The only difference between the two weapons is that one is fully auto and the other is burst. Aside from that, they are identical. I would expect the same performance from each, with the A4 being much less accurate in full auto mode.FatherTed wrote:
FatherTed wrote:
i really hope all the m16 variants have the proper fire selection modes because really thats just basic STUFF-Sh1fty- wrote:
Demize confirmed the M16A3 and M16A4 will be in the game. I wonder what the difference between the two will be, and which will be the starting weapon.
I'm hoping that the M16A4 is the starting weapon. I really enjoy how faction-specific weapons shape the game. One the one hand, you'll have the USMC with accurate M16A4s that are better suited in longer range combat, and the Russians with medium range inaccurate AKs.
It won't be that way though most likely.
I wonder what the difference between the A3 and A4 will be besides being full auto vs burst. Maybe the A3 is less accurate or does less damage? How would you guys have differentiated the two, or would you have even implemented an A3 if it were up to you?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I think sh1fty was talking about in game balancing as opposed to IRL...Jay wrote:
The only difference between the two weapons is that one is fully auto and the other is burst. Aside from that, they are identical. I would expect the same performance from each, with the A4 being much less accurate in full auto mode.FatherTed wrote:
FatherTed wrote:
i really hope all the m16 variants have the proper fire selection modes because really thats just basic STUFF-Sh1fty- wrote:
Demize confirmed the M16A3 and M16A4 will be in the game. I wonder what the difference between the two will be, and which will be the starting weapon.
I'm hoping that the M16A4 is the starting weapon. I really enjoy how faction-specific weapons shape the game. One the one hand, you'll have the USMC with accurate M16A4s that are better suited in longer range combat, and the Russians with medium range inaccurate AKs.
It won't be that way though most likely.
I wonder what the difference between the A3 and A4 will be besides being full auto vs burst. Maybe the A3 is less accurate or does less damage? How would you guys have differentiated the two, or would you have even implemented an A3 if it were up to you?
This is gonna be Bad Company 3 basically.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6975
Isn't the A3 the full auto one?Jay wrote:
The only difference between the two weapons is that one is fully auto and the other is burst. Aside from that, they are identical. I would expect the same performance from each, with the A4 being much less accurate in full auto mode.FatherTed wrote:
FatherTed wrote:
i really hope all the m16 variants have the proper fire selection modes because really thats just basic STUFF-Sh1fty- wrote:
Demize confirmed the M16A3 and M16A4 will be in the game. I wonder what the difference between the two will be, and which will be the starting weapon.
I'm hoping that the M16A4 is the starting weapon. I really enjoy how faction-specific weapons shape the game. One the one hand, you'll have the USMC with accurate M16A4s that are better suited in longer range combat, and the Russians with medium range inaccurate AKs.
It won't be that way though most likely.
I wonder what the difference between the A3 and A4 will be besides being full auto vs burst. Maybe the A3 is less accurate or does less damage? How would you guys have differentiated the two, or would you have even implemented an A3 if it were up to you?
and why is that?Roc18 wrote:
This is gonna be Bad Company 3 basically.
It looks and plays just like Bad Company 2. It's on virtually the same engine. I'm not saying that's a bad thing though, it just doesn't feel like a true successor to what Battlefield 2 was.aerodynamic wrote:
and why is that?Roc18 wrote:
This is gonna be Bad Company 3 basically.
when i played the alpha it played nothing like bc2.Roc18 wrote:
It looks and plays just like Bad Company 2. It's on virtually the same engine. I'm not saying that's a bad thing though, it just doesn't feel like a true successor to what Battlefield 2 was.aerodynamic wrote:
and why is that?Roc18 wrote:
This is gonna be Bad Company 3 basically.
I actually can't play bc2 anymore because well, its pure shit compared to bf3
lolaerodynamic wrote:
when i played the alpha it played nothing like bc2.Roc18 wrote:
It looks and plays just like Bad Company 2. It's on virtually the same engine. I'm not saying that's a bad thing though, it just doesn't feel like a true successor to what Battlefield 2 was.aerodynamic wrote:
and why is that?
I actually can't play bc2 anymore because well, its pure shit compared to bf3
indeedTrotskygrad wrote:
I think sh1fty was talking about in game balancing as opposed to IRL...Jay wrote:
The only difference between the two weapons is that one is fully auto and the other is burst. Aside from that, they are identical. I would expect the same performance from each, with the A4 being much less accurate in full auto mode.FatherTed wrote:
FatherTed wrote:
i really hope all the m16 variants have the proper fire selection modes because really thats just basic STUFF
@jet gameplay posted earlier
I hope there's an F12 view like in BF2142 and BF2. It was the only way to see the enemy plane in a dogfight.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
gurdeep wrote:
lolaerodynamic wrote:
when i played the alpha it played nothing like bc2.Roc18 wrote:
It looks and plays just like Bad Company 2. It's on virtually the same engine. I'm not saying that's a bad thing though, it just doesn't feel like a true successor to what Battlefield 2 was.
I actually can't play bc2 anymore because well, its pure shit compared to bf3
k, when i played the alpha it looked like an improved Bad Company 2. 3d spotting, same gun sounds, similar squad system, rush mode, no commander and like i said earlier it's on the Frostbite engine just like BC2.aerodynamic wrote:
when i played the alpha it played nothing like bc2.Roc18 wrote:
It looks and plays just like Bad Company 2. It's on virtually the same engine. I'm not saying that's a bad thing though, it just doesn't feel like a true successor to what Battlefield 2 was.aerodynamic wrote:
and why is that?
I actually can't play bc2 anymore because well, its pure shit compared to bf3
No commander?Roc18 wrote:
k, when i played the alpha it looked like an improved Bad Company 2. 3d spotting, same gun sounds, similar squad system, rush mode, no commander and like i said earlier it's on the Frostbite engine just like BC2.aerodynamic wrote:
when i played the alpha it played nothing like bc2.Roc18 wrote:
It looks and plays just like Bad Company 2. It's on virtually the same engine. I'm not saying that's a bad thing though, it just doesn't feel like a true successor to what Battlefield 2 was.
I actually can't play bc2 anymore because well, its pure shit compared to bf3
Not a true sequel then.
Last edited by RDMC (2011-08-22 13:24:19)
Commander isn't that important. I'm glad I won't hear "ENEMY INFANTRY SPOTTED" every 0.1 seconds from a spamming commander. Too many commanders didn't do their job anyways, so I'm not concerned with it's removal.
I do hope they add more mechanical sounding gun sounds.
I do hope they add more mechanical sounding gun sounds.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
shut up shifty
gun sounds are not the thing that they have to focus on in this game
gun sounds are not the thing that they have to focus on in this game
Last edited by Finray (2011-08-22 13:50:40)
You're such a pansy
I want a good game. DICE is a big company. The time they take to make guns that sound like BB guns could be spent making them sound epic.
Maybe guns that sound like little pew pew lasers is your thing finny.
I want a good game. DICE is a big company. The time they take to make guns that sound like BB guns could be spent making them sound epic.
Maybe guns that sound like little pew pew lasers is your thing finny.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
gun sounds in BC2 were pretty damn good-Sh1fty- wrote:
You're such a pansy
I want a good game. DICE is a big company. The time they take to make guns that sound like BB guns could be spent making them sound epic.
Maybe guns that sound like little pew pew lasers is your thing finny.
stop yer bitchin
Shifty, you're being moronic. They're making a remake of a game we've all spent >500 hours on each, minimum. I don't give a fuck if the gun sounds aren't up to your standard. There's a lot more stuff they have to get right. Gun noises are at the bottom of the list. The very bottom.
I wish they would stop trying to be everything and just focus on massive multiplayer. Fuck single player, fuck co op, just give me a proper sequel with a ton of effort in one area and make it strong instead of spreading thin and trying to accomplish too much.
shifty you fully deserve your village idiot status.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
No, I'd put which side the ejection ports are below how they sound.Finray wrote:
Shifty, you're being moronic. They're making a remake of a game we've all spent >500 hours on each, minimum. I don't give a fuck if the gun sounds aren't up to your standard. There's a lot more stuff they have to get right. Gun noises are at the bottom of the list. The very bottom.
yep the ejection port really is a key thing for them to get right
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
It would have been nice, but how are they going to profit on the cash cow which is console noobs with no SP?mtb0minime wrote:
I wish they would stop trying to be everything and just focus on massive multiplayer. Fuck single player, fuck co op, just give me a proper sequel with a ton of effort in one area and make it strong instead of spreading thin and trying to accomplish too much.
Maybe you just have unreal expectations of what guns actually sound like.-Sh1fty- wrote:
You're such a pansy
I want a good game. DICE is a big company. The time they take to make guns that sound like BB guns could be spent making them sound epic.
Maybe guns that sound like little pew pew lasers is your thing finny.
iirc Dice posted a video of them going to a swedish millitary firing range and recording sounds for each gun in the game, if they sound like "bb guns" then that might actually be what they sound like.
Pages: 1 … 227 228 229 230 231 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread