Lets say ~$600/gun = $9600
Fuck Israel
are you allowed to carry your own pistols?1stSFOD-Delta wrote:
AK and Glock 34 are missing from the picture. Taking the EOtech and magnifier to afghanland with me.
http://i578.photobucket.com/albums/ss22 … ure025.jpg
http://i578.photobucket.com/albums/ss22 … ure026.jpg
If you only shoot .22LR, sure. Otherwise it tends to get pricey.Dilbert_X wrote:
It can be a cheap hobby, you don't need to spend megabucks at all.
The equipment whores usually come last.
Last edited by Macbeth (2011-07-04 20:54:26)
with those all you hear from my .22 is the click of the pin droppingMacbeth wrote:
A person I went to school with posted a video on facebook of them firing .22 CB's through a rifle. Really quiet bullet.
I googled it and apparently the bullet doesn't use any gun powder. Considering the lack of powder isn't the bullet really weak? It would suck to get hit with it of course but what kind of damage would someone be looking at after taking one of those?
Not really, if you reload and use unjacketed projectiles the cost is barely much more than premium .22 ammo.RAIMIUS wrote:
If you only shoot .22LR, sure. Otherwise it tends to get pricey.Dilbert_X wrote:
It can be a cheap hobby, you don't need to spend megabucks at all.
The equipment whores usually come last.
how are they projected if they have no gunpowder?krazed wrote:
with those all you hear from my .22 is the click of the pin droppingMacbeth wrote:
A person I went to school with posted a video on facebook of them firing .22 CB's through a rifle. Really quiet bullet.
I googled it and apparently the bullet doesn't use any gun powder. Considering the lack of powder isn't the bullet really weak? It would suck to get hit with it of course but what kind of damage would someone be looking at after taking one of those?
the "damage" they do is compared to a higher end air rifle
They use the pressure from the exploding primer.Camm wrote:
how are they projected if they have no gunpowder?krazed wrote:
with those all you hear from my .22 is the click of the pin droppingMacbeth wrote:
A person I went to school with posted a video on facebook of them firing .22 CB's through a rifle. Really quiet bullet.
I googled it and apparently the bullet doesn't use any gun powder. Considering the lack of powder isn't the bullet really weak? It would suck to get hit with it of course but what kind of damage would someone be looking at after taking one of those?
the "damage" they do is compared to a higher end air rifle
Camm wrote:
how are they projected if they have no gunpowder?
Have a reference book somewhere (AMCP 706-106, iirc) with illustrations of various primers being ignited, the burn energies, and burn efficiency.mcgid1 wrote:
They use the pressure from the exploding primer.
Is that the funky looking shotgun from Bad Company or am I thinking of something else?
Last edited by west-phoenix-az (2011-07-07 19:31:27)
What caliber is that, .45ACP?west-phoenix-az wrote:
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123 … S/AR45.jpg
Last edited by Trotskygrad (2011-07-08 07:24:48)
last at what?Dilbert_X wrote:
It can be a cheap hobby, you don't need to spend megabucks at all.
The equipment whores usually come last.