i think it's 15
♥
Poll
48÷2(9+3) = ??
| 288 | 43% | 43% - 40 | ||||
| 2 | 56% | 56% - 51 | ||||
| Total: 91 | ||||||
which one is thath?DrunkFace wrote:
On my calculator...
48/2(9+3) = 2 (as you'd expect)
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
God damnit Toilet, get out of here with that jibba jabber!
what my calculator?Beduin wrote:
which one is thath?DrunkFace wrote:
On my calculator...
48/2(9+3) = 2 (as you'd expect)
Casio scientific fx-82TL
288, it's coming down to multiplication and division, so you go left to right. No operation takes preference over the other.
it's simple bedmas
I knew it isn't a texas :pDrunkFace wrote:
what my calculator?Beduin wrote:
which one is thath?DrunkFace wrote:
On my calculator...
48/2(9+3) = 2 (as you'd expect)
Casio scientific fx-82TL
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
mtb0minime wrote:
288, it's coming down to multiplication and division, so you go left to right. No operation takes preference over the other.
48 48 <-> (9+3) 48*(9+3)DrunkFace wrote:
48BALTINS wrote:
48 48*(9+3) 576
-- * (9+3) = ----------- = --------- = 288
2 2 2
doing integral calculus for the past week, these basics define whether the answer is right or terrifyingly wrong.
---------- = 2
2(9+3)
On my calculator...
48/2*(9+3) = 288 (as you'd expect)
48/2(9+3) = 2 (as you'd expect)
-- * (9+3) = --- * ----- = -------------
2 2 <-> 1 2
that's how fractions work
shut upStimey wrote:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ag7szdyjTS0/T … tarded.jpg
You can't just add a multiplication sign where ever you want it.
Gooners wrote:
thisWinston_Churchill wrote:
Brackets
Exponents
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction
Therefore its 2. It is pretty poor notation though.
What if you put in x for (9+3) so that it was 48/2x. Would you still decide to switch it to 48x/2?
Who the fuck gives a shit
Sturgeon wrote:
Who the fuck gives a shit
Sturgeon wrote:
Sturgeon wrote:
Who the fuck gives a shit
♥
Toilet Sex wrote:
Sturgeon wrote:
Sturgeon wrote:
Who the fuck gives a shit
It is 2, you multiply before dividing.
288 = (48/2)(9+3)
Anyways, the lesson here is too always use (...) to clarify what you mean?
And good point @ Winston_Churchill on page 1, nobody would switch it too 48x/2, does not make sense
288 = (48/2)(9+3)
Anyways, the lesson here is too always use (...) to clarify what you mean?
And good point @ Winston_Churchill on page 1, nobody would switch it too 48x/2, does not make sense
thisDesertFox- wrote:
It is, because that's what makes it vague. If you use the normal fractional method you would definitively know if 48/2x(9+3) or 48/[2(9+3)] is meanticeman785 wrote:
Clearly the type of division symbol is the underlying problem here.
ebug9 wrote:
Toilet Sex wrote:
Sturgeon wrote:
Who the fuck gives a shit
its 2
Sam, wtfgas
Lets expand using US logic.
48÷18+6
Ohhh shit I got 8.67
48÷18+6
Ohhh shit I got 8.67
Only an ape would come up with 288, the answer is 2 if you're intelligent.
Spamtheban wrote:
its 2