I think he's shite in anything else I've seen him in, that national treasure film actually made me angry it was so bad.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
I liked Gone in 60 Seconds despite him. I loved the cars and the Sphinx character.presidentsheep wrote:
I think he's shite in anything else I've seen him in, that national treasure film actually made me angry it was so bad.
So true, did you ever see The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans. It's possibly one of the worst films I have ever seen.JohnG@lt wrote:
I like Wahlberg.Poseidon wrote:
Like I said: He just needs the proper roles. In LLV, the role of suicidal drunk was perfect for him because of his acting style. He's not a good actor as in someone who can play a multitude of roles (like some would say about Christian Bale), he's more of someone who has a specific type of persona, and portrays it perfectly. I think Mark Wahlberg, who is another fantastic actor who gets caught up in shitty movies.JohnG@lt wrote:
He plays the same character in every single movie. Seriously, he's the worst.
There are few constants in this world but one of them is this: if Nicholas Cage is in a movie it's going to be terrible. It's not because he gets bad scripts. It's because he's awful.
Last edited by dayarath (2011-02-25 11:13:51)
THat brought a tear into my eye :'(jord wrote:
He was alright in city of angels...
when everythings made to be broken... i just want you to know who i am
Then you've never seen Bloodsportdayarath wrote:
I've never seen van damme act good. Let alone this good... maybe it's because he's being himself I think;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72SqlBel … re=related
haven't seen the movie but that got me interested.
Cage is nothing exceptional. In fact, he should be thanking his lucky stars that he has had the roles he has. By any measurable acting critique he is horrible. Is he convincing? No. Is he dynamic and versatile? No. Does he make you forget you are in a theater watching a movie? No. .. those are things that a good performance artist will do.presidentsheep wrote:
I think he's shite in anything else I've seen him in, that national treasure film actually made me angry it was so bad.
We Own the Night, Invincible, the Fighter?Poseidon wrote:
I think Mark Wahlberg, who is another fantastic actor who gets caught up in shitty movies.
JohnG@lt wrote:
Then you've never seen Bloodsportdayarath wrote:
I've never seen van damme act good. Let alone this good... maybe it's because he's being himself I think;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72SqlBel … re=related
haven't seen the movie but that got me interested.
Good luck.Superior Mind wrote:
I re-watched HBO's Rome while I was taking a Roman Civ course with a prof who does specifically Roman archaeology. The show had many accurate nuances of Roman life which I was able to identify to my course readings. For that I enjoyed the show. My biggest gripe were the British accents. I want a film or show set in Rome to be done in Latin.
Cage is his own pigeon hole. He overacts his roles characters with too much seriousness for the subject matter. But there are some cases where this is a desirable asset (Kick-Ass, Moonstruck, etc). He's not the best actor ever, but he's instantly recognizable.Kmar wrote:
Cage isn't pigeon holed into the same horrible roles. He is put there with the sole intent of garnering an audience that truly doesn't understand or put much weight into the art of acting. Cage has had opportunities to show off his craft. I could name a half dozen movies with good screenplay, directing, and a great supporting cast. What is wrong with all of the roles? .. just the fact that Nick Cage played them.
He's out of his league.
Max Payne, The Happening, Planet of the Apes? He's had his share. Just as Cage had his share of great movies - Adaptation, LLV, and arguably Kick-Ass. Though obviously the ratio between the two is different as Wahlberg's been lucky enough to get into a Scorsese movie.Kmar wrote:
We Own the Night, Invincible, the Fighter?Poseidon wrote:
I think Mark Wahlberg, who is another fantastic actor who gets caught up in shitty movies.
He's a better producer than actor tho..
what and you're fluent? i'm glad to leave that shit in school and out of the cinemaSuperior Mind wrote:
I re-watched HBO's Rome while I was taking a Roman Civ course with a prof who does specifically Roman archaeology. The show had many accurate nuances of Roman life which I was able to identify to my course readings. For that I enjoyed the show. My biggest gripe were the British accents. I want a film or show set in Rome to be done in Latin.
This one's for you:Kampframmer wrote:
I think the only Nicholas Cage movie where he actually added something to it was Lord of War, although i believe that there are other actors that could have played it just as well or better
I don't see anything wrong with reviving a dead language for a movie for curiosity's sake.Uzique wrote:
what and you're fluent? i'm glad to leave that shit in school and out of the cinemaSuperior Mind wrote:
I re-watched HBO's Rome while I was taking a Roman Civ course with a prof who does specifically Roman archaeology. The show had many accurate nuances of Roman life which I was able to identify to my course readings. For that I enjoyed the show. My biggest gripe were the British accents. I want a film or show set in Rome to be done in Latin.