Pages: 1 … 43 44 45 46 47 … 683
answer my questionFloppY_ wrote:
So you blame the entire platform for your own lazyness/shortsightedness?11 Bravo wrote:
well sir, i keep track of everything i spend..have been doing so for about 15 years now. and i spent way more when i had a pc for gaming versus the ps3. i will admit some of the stuff was prolly not necessary but even if i subtract that its still more.FloppY_ wrote:
So you'd rather update your console?
same shit tbh
btw where is that 300 dollar bf3 puter you mentioned?EDIT post =/= quote tree11 Bravo wrote:
cba to make quote treeslopermento wrote:
3 posts in 3 minutes? Really?
Last edited by m3thod (2011-02-12 16:23:39)
It will be multi platform but PC will be the lead development platform. so fingers crossed a worthwile sucessor to BF2 is released. Oh wait it has jets so it is!justice wrote:
So I just found out yesterday about this, but cba to read everything, so...
Will this be as good as bf2 was in its day?
Will this multi-platform shizzle ruin the PC version?
uh, you realize running bf2 on minimum settings besides geometry, effects, and view distance gave you an advantage over everyone else who was running on max setting, right?11 Bravo wrote:
if you are going to tell me someone with a uber graphics card and killer setup doesnt have an advantage (face value, not player specific) over someone with a basic dell that runs the game on min settings then i will never believe that.FloppY_ wrote:
Hackers are a little-to-non issue since the introduction of VAC, Punkbuster and similar filters...11 Bravo wrote:
my problem is pc world is filled with hackers, thief's, and people who can get an advantage just by spending more money. thats lame if you ask me.
You honestly think you have an advantage by having a 5k DPI mouse rather than a 800DPI ?
srsly where do you come up with this shit...
I would have posted that, but 11b would have kept arguing with me rather than the point.. +1HaiBai wrote:
uh, you realize running bf2 on minimum settings besides geometry, effects, and view distance gave you an advantage over everyone else who was running on max setting, right?11 Bravo wrote:
if you are going to tell me someone with a uber graphics card and killer setup doesnt have an advantage (face value, not player specific) over someone with a basic dell that runs the game on min settings then i will never believe that.FloppY_ wrote:
Hackers are a little-to-non issue since the introduction of VAC, Punkbuster and similar filters...
You honestly think you have an advantage by having a 5k DPI mouse rather than a 800DPI ?
srsly where do you come up with this shit...
You can have my current PC... It will run BF3 and it's much newer than the PS3...FatherTed wrote:
consoles are cheaper. ignore any screens/speakers etc, build me a PC for £300 that can play BF3.
Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-02-12 17:22:03)
Uzique wrote:
no one 'needs' to buy them. your problem with pc games seems to be that there's a lot of unnecessary shit... but why does that actually bother you? it's UNNECESSARY, that's exactly the whole point. if anything, it's a bonus to pc gamers that there's a choice and option. if you don't like or get along with a particular console controller... it's basically tough-shit.
I use the cheapest mouse and keyboard I can get my hands on for FPS gaming and they last for years at a time. For a benchmark, have a ~3 KDR with ~40k kills in BF2. For flight, I move to a simple joystick with a little non-spring thumb throttle. I have a gamepad as well with analog input, but it's reserved for platformers.11 Bravo wrote:
having done both i prefer the analog stick..
plus i dont have to buy a uber 100000zillion dpi gamer mouse
Any console I have that's capable of it is just plugged into my computer monitor via selector switch and/or AV receiver. Exact same thing I use for PC games.m3thod wrote:
dont forget the $5000 70 inch TV to play in on.
and a $2000 cinema sound system to boot as the TV speakers will be wank
and pay $60 for a each game
Sweet deal brah!
Fingers crossed indeed !m3thod wrote:
It will be multi platform but PC will be the lead development platform. so fingers crossed a worthwile sucessor to BF2 is released. Oh wait it has jets so it is!justice wrote:
So I just found out yesterday about this, but cba to read everything, so...
Will this be as good as bf2 was in its day?
Will this multi-platform shizzle ruin the PC version?
Why wouldn't we hope?Uzique wrote:
i think you guys are hoping for pc gaming to return to a bygone and now-impossible era
Hey I'm not saying PC gaming isn't dying thanks to dumb 12 year old Activision customers...Uzique wrote:
and people with terminal illnesses that accept the ineluctable inevitability of death are much better for it, too
living in delusion isn't healthy, kids
what was once will not be again
DUnlimited wrote:
Good single-player games are still coming out. It's just that mp has become what the spastic console monkeys want.
It has uh... dedicated servers.... ehmMiggle wrote:
Could somebody give me a shred of evidence that BF3 has a chance of being a good game?
Yea just remembered, depended on your class. If you chose a class with a French gun you spoke with french accent, if you had a german gun class you spoke german accented. Not sure if there was British.globefish23 wrote:
Some where German:FloppY_ wrote:
If so, they are very, VERY bad german accentsWar Man wrote:
Good customizable classes, hopefully it'll be different configuration than both bf2142 and BC2, I want something new.
Thought they were German accents.
Ah well
"Enemy MTW spotted"
MTW = Mannschaftstransportwagen = APC
Some where French:
"Medic ici"
Don't know if there were any other supposed accents, as those two lines were the only certain ones for me.What?FloppY_ wrote:
I hate footsteps in this kind of game... it gives people with headsets a HUGE advantage over us "speaker" peopleJdeFalconr wrote:
Biggest ones for me...
I can hear footsteps equally good with both speakers and headphones.
The real big advantage over a surround speaker system is that you also can distinguish between events in front and behind you.
That doesn't really work with stereo headphones and surround headphones are way too expensive for their scope of performance. Also, I somehow doubt that you can get a proper surround sound with multiple speakers crammed into a few centimeters of headphone.
Last edited by War Man (2011-02-12 19:11:21)
Pages: 1 … 43 44 45 46 47 … 683