I hate assholes like you, who don't even see through the Bush administrations bullshit. Don't you KNOW how worse things are in Africa? You claim that Bush got Suddam to 'liberate' the people (even though it was clear that our initial motive to invade was because he had WMD's), yet HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of people are dying world wide every year, whether it's from starvation, political oppression, or just plain killing.Rellim83 wrote:
.......I iraq had no terrorism before.......ARE U SERIOUS!!!!!!IronFerret wrote:
and you pretend that figth a war against global terrorism (also "global" is just middle east), would be solve occupying every muslim nation in the world.. that just gonna make more terrorism... Iraq had no terrorism before ocupation and now.. look at media and open your eyes.Mike_J wrote:
are you guys pretending that the fight against global terrorism isn't a war? open your eyes..
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4675902.stm
The guy (Sadam Hussein) made a public announcement providing a safe haven to all terrorists against America right after the invasion of afghanistan
He consistently bombed and murdered political rivals in the north and south(thats why they had a no fly zone since desert storm)
He has used chemical and biological weapons in the past. (Israel, Kuwait)
He ploted to assassinate a former president. (Bush sr.)
Oh ya and their was that whole thing about refusing to let weapons inspectors into the country for like 6 years....ya he might not have had anything but how could anybody possibly believe that when he refused to let weapons inspectors into the country.
I absolutly agree that the occupation in iraq has many problems, but i completly support going to war. Saddam was a threat to America, his neighbors, and his own people. Saddam was given ample time and many warnings refusing to comply with weapons inspectors, all he had to do was let them inspect his facilities. He was stupid enough to refuse and thats why we had to go to war with him.
Iran is a much larger threat than Iraq ever was. So is North Korea.
If Bush wanted to 'liberate' the world, he's doing a bad job at that, too. Don't get me wrong, we completely destroyed a stable, yes, stable, but oppresive government. Now, there is no government at all, and we are occupying a country with unstable and very different people, who have hated eachothers guts for thousands of years. War is inevitable, in a country in Iraq, whether we are there occupying it or not.
In my view, it's a civil war. Let THEM decide if they should remain one, unified, fucked up country, or split into 3 seperate countries of their own. But forcing them into it won't work, simple as that.
WW3, are you kidding me? That's a joke and a disgrace to EVERY veteran who has ever served in any war for the United States. 60 MILLION people died in World War 2, and something around 15 in World War 1. We, the United States alone, have lost about 5,000 in this 'world war 3'. That's a joke. Is he implying that this is only the first stage? Does our president know what the fuck he's talking about? Or is he using this as a gimmick to scare people into voting for a pro-war republican candidate for 2008?
Last edited by Spearhead (2006-05-07 16:26:48)