Pft, the US-shotgun is awsome. And I do mostly play with out unlocks so...the DAO is good, yes.LaidBackNinja wrote:
AT > Engineer in close combat (I'm talking about the DOA-12 of course)[tlv]TDL wrote:
Engineer is maybe the best kit for close combat, very useful on karkand. Snipers is totaly, completly useless, only for noobs with out skill enough to survive when enemies see them.
Support > Engineer in close combat
Last edited by [tlv]TDL (2006-05-06 17:34:36)
I dont care about my stats m8. U still suck as a sniper if you say that sniper is the most useless class. It only means you r not using it the way its needed. Its very easy to gain a positive kd ratio as a sniper in a tank, apc, plane whatever. This doesnt mean you are a good sniper. So i'm still saying, u suck. Look at your sniper kills with sniper rifle, and then look at your kills with sniper kit. 6/7th of them are NOT with sniper rifle. lol.<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:
I suck as a sniper? Look at my stats.... sniper is my highest K/D ratio.HisInfernalDeath wrote:
U probably totally suck as a sniper. That will explain the reason why u find it the most useless class.<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:
Wrong. Firestorm spends most of his time commanding as a sniper... the kills he accumulates are mostly from artillery, which count globally for the kit you are using.
As I said, the only sniper worth a damn is a COMMANDER sniper because out of everyone on the team they have the right to sit still and have something to shoot at while their stuff is being refreshed.
Well let me ring a bell for ya.
There is no useless class in BF2.
Just try to take any control point from me (sniper). I'll defend it, you'll attack or the other way around. U can choose whatever class u want. Lets see who is useless.
Whenever i play with my clan we always go organised as a real life squad. Every class is needed. We dont need 3 AT's to destroy a tank. One AT and support do the trick. Just as simpel as that.
Good snipers take out lots of troops storming a control point, wich leads to an advantage for the assault men on the ground.
I could go on and on.
I will not try to change your mind, but please think before u conclude something.
But as i can see in that one other post u replied on me, the only way u can be good at something is by calling people names. Really grown up i must say.
Someone with an SPM and K/D ratio as low as yours shouldn't be telling me that I suck.
ass ault.. like many othersSaladForks wrote:
-=>cSc<=-*RunDje*cT| wrote:
AssaultCheersKobrakai wrote:
Assault.
Hahahahahaha!!!! Dude, I play for accuracy, not spray and pray. Assault is my most played kit. I'm a G3/M16 sniper, and counter-snipe snipers just fine. But the Spec-Ops guns are far more accurate than the Assault guns, especially when shooting and strafing in medium/short range. At medium range, while moving, I can spray with the G36C and hit with almost every shot. Not so with the G3.Zaitik wrote:
"As much as I play Assault, I would also pick the Assault class as the most useless. The Assault class guns should really be more accurate than the Spec-Ops and Medic guns, especially as run-n-gun weapons. It's sad that the Spec-Ops class can run-n-gun better than the Assault class."
they maybe aint accurate cos you cant aim..
Dude, if this was meant for me, I'm more accurate than you with the Assault guns. And better with the Carbines too.golgoj4 wrote:
I saw another comment on another thread which pointed out that assault players main purpose is that...assault. They arent worried about repairs or heals or destroying assets. Just taking flags and killing the enemy. Oh yeah, and as far as guns...maybe work on your accuracy instead of talking about how a gun sucks.
Last edited by Ilocano (2006-05-08 09:44:24)
Last edited by Sgt.Davi (2006-05-08 13:27:21)
Last edited by IronFerret (2006-05-08 12:07:46)
Last edited by mattajohnstone (2006-05-08 13:53:15)
You're wrong. And WTF is up with resurrecting a thread from May just to voice yet another sniper-bashing opinion? We get enough of that thrown our way... like monkeys pelting us with faeces... without you making a special effort to bring the bias to our attention.tvmissleman wrote:
sniper
Quoted for fucking true.Todd_Angelo wrote:
You're wrong. And WTF is up with resurrecting a thread from May just to voice yet another sniper-bashing opinion? We get enough of that thrown our way... like monkeys pelting us with faeces... without you making a special effort to bring the bias to our attention.tvmissleman wrote:
sniper
at least ppl searched.. bf2s is getting wierd, we flame ppl for not searching, and when they do they get flamed for bumping... at least the reviver didnt say sumthing like bump lol(EUS)Gen.BadSnipaDay wrote:
Quoted for fucking true.Todd_Angelo wrote:
You're wrong. And WTF is up with resurrecting a thread from May just to voice yet another sniper-bashing opinion? We get enough of that thrown our way... like monkeys pelting us with faeces... without you making a special effort to bring the bias to our attention.tvmissleman wrote:
sniper
Moral of the story:
- Dont revive worthless threads.
/Dismissed.
"I searched and found this thread, sorry for reviving it but I didn't want to make a new thread;cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
at least ppl searched.. bf2s is getting wierd, we flame ppl for not searching, and when they do they get flamed for bumping... at least the reviver didnt say sumthing like bump lol(EUS)Gen.BadSnipaDay wrote:
Quoted for fucking true.Todd_Angelo wrote:
You're wrong. And WTF is up with resurrecting a thread from May just to voice yet another sniper-bashing opinion? We get enough of that thrown our way... like monkeys pelting us with faeces... without you making a special effort to bring the bias to our attention.
Moral of the story:
- Dont revive worthless threads.
/Dismissed.
according to you, it's takes plenty of skill. Just TRY and go 50-1 with a LMG without practice, and then i'll shut uppwned7 wrote:
support is the worst. the guns are so shit. as for support users, they require no skill too cause its just spray and prey. its all based on luck according to where ur bullets go