I don't think the ones who flew those planes in the two towers forgave anyone...Beduin wrote:
you can think what ever you want, but muslims do believe that it is a free ticket to paradise... to forgive11 Bravo wrote:
right i dont think you would say that if someone blinded you with acid.Beduin wrote:
Troooolllll!mafia996630 wrote:
It is better to forgive.
I dont think someone did them anything in the first place... well at least not the civies.Sup wrote:
I don't think the ones who flew those planes in the two towers forgave anyone...
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Vengeance System > Justice System.
if my wife cheated on me, then the just punishement would be to stone the bitch to death.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Marijuana thread's that way, guys....ohhhh.
Justice is vengeance.SenorToenails wrote:
I'm sure you agreed with this action too? This isn't justice, it's vengeance.11 Bravo wrote:
i know...and i see no issue with that. punishment should fit the crime. eye for an eye. whatever.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
that's a vindictive, revanchist knee-jerk reaction... a year later you'd probably regret having her killed, tbhm3thod wrote:
if my wife cheated on me, then the just punishement would be to stone the bitch to death.
plus cycles of negativity like that go absolutely nowhere...
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
No it isn't.JohnG@lt wrote:
Justice is vengeance.SenorToenails wrote:
I'm sure you agreed with this action too? This isn't justice, it's vengeance.11 Bravo wrote:
i know...and i see no issue with that. punishment should fit the crime. eye for an eye. whatever.
it's a very poor form of justice, achieved in a reductive mannerBertster7 wrote:
No it isn't.JohnG@lt wrote:
Justice is vengeance.SenorToenails wrote:
I'm sure you agreed with this action too? This isn't justice, it's vengeance.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Justice is idealism.
Wouldn't that be the other way round?Uzique wrote:
it's a very poor form of justice, achieved in a reductive mannerBertster7 wrote:
No it isn't.JohnG@lt wrote:
Justice is vengeance.
Then what is justice? Is it not a reaction to a negative action taken by another?Bertster7 wrote:
No it isn't.JohnG@lt wrote:
Justice is vengeance.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
What about the economics of justice?.Sup wrote:
If justice was vengeance the man would be killed not sent to prison
He is expensive to house. Bullets are cheap.
The Western system of 'justice' is entirely a misnomer. I don't remember the last time a judge patted someone on the back and told them how wonderful of a human being they were and handed them a reward. See, in a true justice system, the good would be rewarded and the bad would be punished.
What we have is a nicely, but incorrectly, named system of organized vengeance. Nothing more.
This is why I get the lolz when bleeding hearts wonder why their efforts to soften the system do nothing but encourage more bad behavior. They're rewarding the wrong people because they have the mistaken belief that it really is a system of justice.
What we have is a nicely, but incorrectly, named system of organized vengeance. Nothing more.
This is why I get the lolz when bleeding hearts wonder why their efforts to soften the system do nothing but encourage more bad behavior. They're rewarding the wrong people because they have the mistaken belief that it really is a system of justice.
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-08-20 14:05:29)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
No it isn't.JohnG@lt wrote:
Then what is justice? Is it not a reaction to a negative action taken by another?Bertster7 wrote:
No it isn't.JohnG@lt wrote:
Justice is vengeance.
It's about fairness, impartiality and harmony. Read some Plato - that explains it far better than I could ever hope to.
In many ways I agree with this. Modern justice systems are less about justice and more about having a deterent in place to reduce crime. Not just a system of organised vengeance. They are a tool of the state, not something for the victim.JohnG@lt wrote:
The Western system of 'justice' is entirely a misnomer. I don't remember the last time a judge patted someone on the back and told them how wonderful of a human being they were and handed them a reward. See, in a true justice system, the good would be rewarded and the bad would be punished.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2010-08-20 14:12:35)
No argument here. I would agree that capital punishment has unfortunately killed the wrong people sometimes. There is a very high profile case of this being investigated in Texas.SenorToenails wrote:
Justice is based on something more than just 'you did X, you get X'. Vengeance is exactly that, and it's obtainable because it's the easy way. It's also inhumane. And then there is the possibility of wrongful conviction...because then you've just maimed the wrong guy. What happens then? Where is his vengeance?Turquoise wrote:
To a degree, yes. But then again, we might as well call the justice system the vengeance system, because in practice, it functions this way far more often.
Justice is an idealistic concept that is hard to quantify and even harder to really administer. Vengeance is generally the best that most societies accomplish.
So yes, "an eye for an eye" certainly has drawbacks as a mode of punishment, although I would suggest this is not because of any moral reasons. Wrongful convictions are the result of a flawed investigation. So, for that reason, I believe the harshest punishments should be limited to very heinous cases. If the punishment for paralyzing someone in a fight is paralysis, then the defendant should be given a few attempts at appeals before suffering paraylsis himself.
However, if someone is clearly responsible for this injury upon someone in a context where there was an attempt at making the victim suffer permanent damage or an attempted murder, then I believe the punishment of paralysis is fully justified.
If this man truly did act with malice toward the victim in a senseless and murderous display of violence, then I believe it really is justice to paralyze him in return. Sometimes, I believe vengeance and justice are one and the same, but then again, my ethics are very utilitarian.
Well, I think that's going a bit far....m3thod wrote:
if my wife cheated on me, then the just punishement would be to stone the bitch to death.
I think justice was served. He got into a fight and paralyzed a person, maybe the person who lost the fight shouldn't have gotten into it in the first place.
No eye for an eye, justice was served, the weaker of the two got what was coming to him.
No eye for an eye, justice was served, the weaker of the two got what was coming to him.
Hmmm... Not for a Muslim, which M3th happens to be...Turquoise wrote:
Well, I think that's going a bit far....m3thod wrote:
if my wife cheated on me, then the just punishement would be to stone the bitch to death.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Bullets are cheap, but the current death row appeals system is expensive as hell... (that can be fixed, however)ATG wrote:
What about the economics of justice?.Sup wrote:
If justice was vengeance the man would be killed not sent to prison
He is expensive to house. Bullets are cheap.
Killing people is always the best solution.
Well, a lot of people (Christians included) would sympathize with killing their wife/husband if she/he cheated on them.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Hmmm... Not for a Muslim, which M3th happens to be...Turquoise wrote:
Well, I think that's going a bit far....m3thod wrote:
if my wife cheated on me, then the just punishement would be to stone the bitch to death.
I think that has less to do with religion and more to do with emotions. Granted, I can totally understand how angry someone can get in that situation.