ahh very interesting.....
Last edited by blademaster (2010-06-25 22:14:50)
Last edited by blademaster (2010-06-25 22:14:50)
Indeed.KuSTaV wrote:
Oh shit. That's pretty interesting and nerve-wracking at the same time. I wouldnt expect copiers to store images anyway.
+1
Yeah I'd have assumed the same. I can't really think of a reason why they would need to store all the images on a HDD.-Sh1fty- wrote:
I thought they used a RAM system where a scanned photo would be put into it's temporary memory so it could print it multiple times. A hard drive is a little overkill, but it's useful if a company loses a file and wants to recuperate it. That is, if they don't mind browsing 20k+ photos
I remember when he had that show on Tech Tv ( then it went gay G4 ) .......... I think it was either him or some fat dude he had on the show that I would have like to punch right in the throat for being so cocky and arrogant toward callers and viewersTravisC555 wrote:
I was listening to Leo Laporte in my car and he was talking about this. I was surprised too that copy machines used hdd, I always assumed that they would use RAM.
a HDD*-Sh1fty- wrote:
Well Winston, we didn't think the producers were stupid enough to use an HDD.
and by reformat you mean overwrite 7-15 times with a series of 1s and 0s right?-Sh1fty- wrote:
By "Erase" do you mean reformat?
I merely sped up the process-Sh1fty- wrote:
I work with computers, that's my job Floppy, I know that.
If Winston said yes then I was going to point out that reformatting is pointless because there's plenty of free programs out there to recuperate the data.