As a very, very, very, VERY loose guideline, $2 = £1.30 = €1.5
Last edited by Finray (2010-05-27 11:57:03)
Last edited by Finray (2010-05-27 11:57:03)
Exactly HOW much masturbation is too much freezer?Freezer7Pro wrote:
I got my hands on a 19" screen that looks like it was never used before. Anyone want to buy a screen?
Sometimes I want to kick you in the mouth.Finray wrote:
512KB to 6700 KB
... Just wow.
It's never enough.SonderKommando wrote:
Exactly HOW much masturbation is too much freezer?Freezer7Pro wrote:
I got my hands on a 19" screen that looks like it was never used before. Anyone want to buy a screen?
http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/ac7/ … 914yay.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/33kq3ko.png
Why? You just increased the size of an image by 1200% and you didn't even get any better quality out of it, since it was originally a JPEG.SonderKommando wrote:
Sometimes I want to kick you in the mouth.Finray wrote:
512KB to 6700 KB
... Just wow.
i see my post on that monitorFreezer7Pro wrote:
I got my hands on a 19" screen that looks like it was never used before. Anyone want to buy a screen?
http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/ac7/ … 914yay.jpg
Stop being such a bitch.Finray wrote:
Why? You just increased the size of an image by 1200% and you didn't even get any better quality out of it, since it was originally a JPEG.SonderKommando wrote:
Sometimes I want to kick you in the mouth.Finray wrote:
512KB to 6700 KB
... Just wow.
This. It doesn't matter in most cases with small images and besides png is way better for some things like printscreens with large areas of same color. Most people's internet can handle this big files anyways but it takes me fucking 70 seconds to load that image. Really. Some sense would be appreciated. Especially when it's really goddamn pointless to transform a jpg to a png.Freezer7Pro wrote:
I must actually stand by Finny's side on this matter. Posting pictures that huge is just inconsiderate toward everybody. It's not rocket science to check if it says PNG or JPG in the "Save As..." dialogue.
O. Sry. Everything is in place now so no separate component pix available but I'll try remember to take and post some on sunday once I get home.IrishGrimReaper wrote:
Pics
The problem with that logic comes to play when the uploader uses a slow host.jsnipy wrote:
must suck to have garbage internet, i can never tell tbh, everything loads up lighting fast
Jesus Christ dude, BF2S takes us AUgians 5 minutes to load, and you go and pull this shit?SonderKommando wrote:
Exactly HOW much masturbation is too much freezer?Freezer7Pro wrote:
I got my hands on a 19" screen that looks like it was never used before. Anyone want to buy a screen?
http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/ac7/ … 914yay.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/33kq3ko.png
Microwave wrote:
Sexy ^
rage at this thenMicrowave wrote:
Max, I saw
"Last post 5 minutes, 21 seconds ago by max" on this thread and I was ready to rage in jealousy at you buying more tech
max wrote:
rage at this thenMicrowave wrote:
Max, I saw
"Last post 5 minutes, 21 seconds ago by max" on this thread and I was ready to rage in jealousy at you buying more tech
I still don't understand why you would bother with all that watercooling equipment if you are only going to use it on your CPU :<Microwave wrote:
http://www.epiclol.com/albums/4chan/FUUUU.jpgmax wrote:
rage at this thenMicrowave wrote:
Max, I saw
"Last post 5 minutes, 21 seconds ago by max" on this thread and I was ready to rage in jealousy at you buying more tech
Yeah, it's great.max wrote:
The GTX260 cooler is pretty good. No way of pushing the clocks any higher, even with more voltage.
Well, technically, mine does too, but it sounds like the oil has vaporized in it.max wrote:
mine are still going strong