Only mode that makes sense with IO is Squad Deathmatch. The IFV in the middle of the map is totally unnecessary and spoils the fun to some extent.
Poll
Do you see the need for IO mode in this game?
| Yes | 12% | 12% - 7 | ||||
| No | 87% | 87% - 50 | ||||
| Total: 57 | ||||||
+1DUnlimited wrote:
Why though, I can see most of the rush maps get completely stuck without vehicles. I would much rather understand IO for conquest than rush.Chou wrote:
IO on Rush: Yes.
Since I can't play it - Yes
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Screeeeeeeeeew you.Varegg wrote:
Since I can't play it - Yes
Lets face it, they will introduce IO mode and NO servers will be running it unless they are Squad Deathmatch where the mode would be nice.
So really, who cares?
So really, who cares?
Do you really believe so? My guess is that if the mode is ranked, a lot of servers will run it. In germans I trusttheDude5B wrote:
Lets face it, they will introduce IO mode and NO servers will be running it unless they are Squad Deathmatch where the mode would be nice.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Servers will of course run IO, look at BF2, why would BC2 be any different?
Because the vehicles in bc2 are no where near as impacting. No jets for one; no lines at the runway which diminish your infantry count out in the field and players that do nothing but fly and and down the field bombing.Nordemus wrote:
Servers will of course run IO, look at BF2, why would BC2 be any different?
Fair enough, maybe not as many as in BF2, but there will still be plenty. Really looking forward to Arica Harbor IO Rush...jsnipy wrote:
Because the vehicles in bc2 are no where near as impacting. No jets for one; no lines at the runway which diminish your infantry count out in the field and players that do nothing but fly and and down the field bombing.Nordemus wrote:
Servers will of course run IO, look at BF2, why would BC2 be any different?
Exactly.jsnipy wrote:
Because the vehicles in bc2 are no where near as impacting. No jets for one; no lines at the runway which diminish your infantry count out in the field and players that do nothing but fly and and down the field bombing.Nordemus wrote:
Servers will of course run IO, look at BF2, why would BC2 be any different?
Plus the likelihood of some douche spawn raping an uncap with a tank is a lot lower, and easier to eliminate.
I have an opening on FridayRDMC wrote:
Screeeeeeeeeew you.Varegg wrote:
Since I can't play it - Yes
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Varegg wrote:
I have an opening on FridayRDMC wrote:
Screeeeeeeeeew you.Varegg wrote:
Since I can't play it - Yes
There is certaintly nothing wrong with more play options.Nordemus wrote:
Fair enough, maybe not as many as in BF2, but there will still be plenty. Really looking forward to Arica Harbor IO Rush...jsnipy wrote:
Because the vehicles in bc2 are no where near as impacting. No jets for one; no lines at the runway which diminish your infantry count out in the field and players that do nothing but fly and and down the field bombing.Nordemus wrote:
Servers will of course run IO, look at BF2, why would BC2 be any different?
Sarcasm right? I've played Arica Harbor Rush where the attackers couldn't get pass the first spawn. And if the attackers managed that, they got stuck on the second spawn.Nordemus wrote:
Fair enough, maybe not as many as in BF2, but there will still be plenty. Really looking forward to Arica Harbor IO Rush...jsnipy wrote:
Because the vehicles in bc2 are no where near as impacting. No jets for one; no lines at the runway which diminish your infantry count out in the field and players that do nothing but fly and and down the field bombing.Nordemus wrote:
Servers will of course run IO, look at BF2, why would BC2 be any different?
I voted yes because why not have it? Its just another option for players, greatly increasing the variety of the game. If people don't like IO then don't go on it. If people do like IO then go on it. What is it hurting by not having IO?
First of all there's nothing in IO that would "greatly increase the variety of the game" as it has been covered in the posts all over this thread.JadedDope wrote:
I voted yes because why not have it? Its just another option for players, greatly increasing the variety of the game. If people don't like IO then don't go on it. If people do like IO then go on it. What is it hurting by not having IO?
Secondly, I pointed out why the addition of IO might be bad, try reading the OP next time.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
I do believe so. Ok, so there will be some servers running it, but I can't see any respectable server running IO mode as it is completely pointless in every mode except Squad Deathmatch.DUnlimited wrote:
Do you really believe so? My guess is that if the mode is ranked, a lot of servers will run it. In germans I trusttheDude5B wrote:
Lets face it, they will introduce IO mode and NO servers will be running it unless they are Squad Deathmatch where the mode would be nice.
Armour and Helo's are not over powered, so taking them out would actually make the game dull. The larger Rush maps would be crap without the vehicles. Can you imagine Arica Harbor IO Rush? If you were in a BAD squad who died constantly, you would always be spawning far away from the first two bases and then having to run along the road. Atacama Desert would be completely shit without vehicles, as would Isla Inocentes. Isla Inocentes would end up with the attacking team ALL having to either walk over the hill, or swim through the water.
...JadedDope wrote:
I voted yes because why not have it? Its just another option for players, greatly increasing the variety of the game. If people don't like IO then don't go on it. If people do like IO then go on it. What is it hurting by not having IO?
Oh hey! You like Coffee - Real, Coffee, with Caffeine! So do we! But....
Some people don't! So we're making Decaf! Decaf is great! It's all the goodness of Coffee, just minus the caffeine!
What's that? You like your regular coffee? Oh, well, we'll still make it... However, you'll now have to drive 30 minutes down the road to a sketchy gas station where is will either be cold and stale, or taste like rancid shit squeezed out our assholes.
Enjoy!
EE (hats
Voted yes for this reason ...Sisco10 wrote:
Only mode that makes sense with IO is Squad Deathmatch. The IFV in the middle of the map is totally unnecessary and spoils the fun to some extent.
Omg..because the IFV really does impact the gameplay all that much..Stingray24 wrote:
Voted yes for this reason ...Sisco10 wrote:
Only mode that makes sense with IO is Squad Deathmatch. The IFV in the middle of the map is totally unnecessary and spoils the fun to some extent.
No one ever uses it anywaysRDMC wrote:
Omg..because the IFV really does impact the gameplay all that much..Stingray24 wrote:
Voted yes for this reason ...Sisco10 wrote:
Only mode that makes sense with IO is Squad Deathmatch. The IFV in the middle of the map is totally unnecessary and spoils the fun to some extent.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Usually no one uses it until one squad falls behind on kills. It does not ruin the round and often gets mortared quickly due to the high density of snipers in this mode, but it still seems unnecessary and imbalanced a bit.DUnlimited wrote:
No one ever uses it anywaysRDMC wrote:
Omg..because the IFV really does impact the gameplay all that much..Stingray24 wrote:
Voted yes for this reason ...
That being said, for that reason alone I wouldn´t need an IO mode. I play SQDM rarely anyways.
I always use it, just to get back at the m60 wielding medicsDUnlimited wrote:
No one ever uses it anywaysRDMC wrote:
Omg..because the IFV really does impact the gameplay all that much..Stingray24 wrote:
Voted yes for this reason ...