dude you really are a fucking moron. wow. and lol
Tu Stultus Es
Far Left | 9% | 9% - 6 | ||||
Left | 7% | 7% - 5 | ||||
Moderate Left | 19% | 19% - 12 | ||||
Center (more or less) | 26% | 26% - 17 | ||||
Moderate Right | 9% | 9% - 6 | ||||
Right | 19% | 19% - 12 | ||||
Far Right | 7% | 7% - 5 | ||||
Total: 63 |
No, I'm pretty sure the far right is divorced from actual reality.Reciprocity wrote:
the people who elected George Bush and then divorced themselves from his reality?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
An anti-establishment far right
compare it to where we are headed FM, this the point. we are hesaded in some sort of "NEO" fuckin direction as I descibe, and it is being welcomed with open arms.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I thought I made it pretty clear that personal responsibility is #1.lowing wrote:
The problem is, the establishment that you are ohhh so against is steeped in personal responsibility. Now you have syndromes, and 200 year old history, and your parents, and your environment, the rich, and your "bad luck" all stepping in as "NEO" Bullshit to relieve you of the basic premise that benesath it all, you are responsible for yourself. So much so the mere thought of it brings out mockery, hostility and insults.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
An anti-establishment far right, that steeped in DST over time has become an anti-establishment far right with a general disdain for the European forfeiture of personal responsibility and ambition.
You don't know my parents so shut the fuck up about that.
Even under Republican rule, the government has any number of welfare programs and other "fail-safe" aspects that it adds to society. All of which should in theory be done away with, in practice be drastically reduced. The government is not "steeped in personal responsibility".emphasis mineJohnG@lt wrote:
No, being anti-establishment means taking responsibility for yourself and your own actions rather than allowing yourself to become dependent on a government. Learn your terms, not the corrupted terminology of the hippies.
The Norwegians seem to be doing pretty well for themselves.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
An anti-establishment far right, that steeped in DST over time has become an anti-establishment far right with a general disdain for the European forfeiture of personal responsibility and ambition.
nah m8 this tenner is saved for a pizza laterjord wrote:
Lend us a tenner mate
Neo simply means new. Since the current Liberal designation no longer represents what liberal ideology originally did, they tacked a neo on the front of it. It simply means 'new liberal' or to be more accurate, 'old liberal' as in the liberalism of Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, John Stuart Mill etc.lowing wrote:
Whatever you want to call it, my post stands. The NEO-ideology bullshit is void of personal responsibility in favor of fairness and blaming someone, ANYONE other than yourself for your problems, or short comings. Even if they gotta invent a fuckin disease or syndrome to make sure of it.JohnG@lt wrote:
No, being anti-establishment means taking responsibility for yourself and your own actions rather than allowing yourself to become dependent on a government. Learn your terms, not the corrupted terminology of the hippies.lowing wrote:
The problem is, the establishment that you are ohhh so against is steeped in personal responsibility. Now you have syndromes, and 200 year old history, and your parents, and your environment, the rich, and your "bad luck" all stepping in as "NEO" Bullshit to relieve you of the basic premise that benesath it all, you are responsible for yourself. So much so the mere thought of it brings out mockery, hostility and insults.
Like the Dewey Decimal System!Uzique wrote:
hahaha lowing thinks that the use of the prefix 'neo' somehow implies some avoid-responsibility-European-hippie thing.
it's just a SEMANTIC way to SIGNIFY the (re)using of an OLD OR OUTMODED term, bringing it back into MODERN nomenclature
it doesn't represent or stand for ANY 'x' or 'y' or 'z' set of ideals; NEO is not an IDEOLOGY. it's part of a SYSTEM OF CATEGORISATION.