try again? i didnt even get an awmghettoperson wrote:
Apparently it's a lot harder to get banned around here than I though.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Today was a tuff day. RA sux...I don't advise getting it.
...
burnzz wrote:
[21:46] botkiller: post in chats or somewhere, that i approve of DSL's posts, and that i won't be back as long as androoz a member. be sure to say this is my message, that you are only copy pasta . . .
post a picture of your cock and balls for meFatherTed wrote:
try again? i didnt even get an awmghettoperson wrote:
Apparently it's a lot harder to get banned around here than I though.
♥
It's Spam day it looks like
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
oh my gawd yes pleaseToilet Sex wrote:
post a picture of your cock and balls for meFatherTed wrote:
try again? i didnt even get an awmghettoperson wrote:
Apparently it's a lot harder to get banned around here than I though.
er
because I want to pad my stats of course
the amount of shit ig does on this forum is easily outweigh by what he contributes. burnz? how in the hell does burnz get banned?
and androoz the obvious troll gets to stay? tell me im wrong?
and androoz the obvious troll gets to stay? tell me im wrong?
Tu Stultus Es
ur not rong lad
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
They expressed their displeasure with the return of Androoz. Made a couple threads and picked on him a bit.Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
wtf? burnzz banned? ig(again)? what the f happened could someone please tell me what's goin on without me havin to read back on the ee chats of the whole day
pease?
...
an heroing?King_County_Downy wrote:
Fine. To be fair, I'll ban myself for 3 days as well. I'm pretty sure I'll get over it, as will they. (Is that a proper sentence?)ebug9 wrote:
It ain't irrelevant when 99% of the forums thinks the same thingKing_County_Downy wrote:
Irrelevant and subjective.
/Overruled
See ya's.
wat
Tell burnzz...NOOOOOOOO! oh wait, I could tell him that..nevermind.ebug9 wrote:
burnzz wrote:
[21:46] botkiller: post in chats or somewhere, that i approve of DSL's posts, and that i won't be back as long as androoz a member. be sure to say this is my message, that you are only copy pasta . . .
...
mebbe it's time for a break anyway.. mebbe they have been logged on too much
well I dont think I would ever see burnz getting banned while androoz stays
Tu Stultus Es
Cock and Bulls?
I hate seeing people get banned for such noble endeavors such as that. A travesty of justice, really.
inoeleven bravo wrote:
well I dont think I would ever see burnz getting banned while androoz stays
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Well you did guys.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
androo has been banned for two weeks twice now, the next will surely be permanent.
Allowing "ban x person" threads just invites more of them. IF we don't close any of them, people would bitch because it's idiotic to have so much of the forum dedicated to the forum itself. If we close some of them, people bitch about where the line is, favoritism, etc. If we close all of them, people bitch for about 24 hours after each one is made once in a blue moon. I'll take the latter.
Allowing "ban x person" threads just invites more of them. IF we don't close any of them, people would bitch because it's idiotic to have so much of the forum dedicated to the forum itself. If we close some of them, people bitch about where the line is, favoritism, etc. If we close all of them, people bitch for about 24 hours after each one is made once in a blue moon. I'll take the latter.
Quick, someone bribe Yellowman to use FM's account and ban androo.
Tu Stultus Es
I'm pretty sure making me a mod would solve a lot of these current issues.
granted, but androoz has said some things that would have definately permed him a couple of years back. not talking about gripes with particular members or mods or anything.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
androo has been banned for two weeks twice now, the next will surely be permanent.
Allowing "ban x person" threads just invites more of them. IF we don't close any of them, people would bitch because it's idiotic to have so much of the forum dedicated to the forum itself. If we close some of them, people bitch about where the line is, favoritism, etc. If we close all of them, people bitch for about 24 hours after each one is made once in a blue moon. I'll take the latter.
Tu Stultus Es
/appropriate gif.tuckergustav wrote:
Popcorn anyone?
Look, the simple fact is that KCD banned people based on their infractions. Androoz's temp ban from before had expired, and once back on the forums he was met with a barrage of insults. But he hadn't DONE anything this time.. yet.. to warrant such stuff. If he does, if ANY member does, it's much better for you to just report the freakin post and let us deal with it.
Just because someone has a bad history doesn't give you license to treat them like crap. Us mods however will look at their posts and reports about them in a much harsher light...
edit: and what FM said.
I don't know why androo stays unbanned as long as he does, he's a clearly terrible attention whoring troll and it seems nothing is done about it.
See @BFBC2 section, Roaring Jet. Complete troll, contributes nothing, unfunny etc.
See @BFBC2 section, Roaring Jet. Complete troll, contributes nothing, unfunny etc.