Cammy, do 8 polls a day, it's the way FFLink did it, it works the best imo. A day per poll is fine too.
A final to find 1 winner has two people in it, a final to find 1st, 2nd and 3rd has, oh shock, 3 people.CammRobb wrote:
No.Finray wrote:
The polls should last longer than a day, because not everyone comes on every day.CammRobb wrote:
5 polls a day - 10 people a day.
7 Days in total for the round of 64.
Make groups of 6. Have 66 entries, 11 groups. Winners of these then go head-to-head, or you could take two from each group of 6. 1v1 on every poll is going to take too long, and will fill up at least 2 pages of the polls section. Not every heat will get voted on.
That fails, I'm not ballsing it up like you.
A final has TWO people in it, not three you ass.
Besides, where did I say put 3 people in a final applying it to your beauty pagent?
You can't have 66 entrants if you want 2 in the final.Finray wrote:
A final to find 1 winner has two people in it, a final to find 1st, 2nd and 3rd has, oh shock, 3 people.CammRobb wrote:
No.Finray wrote:
The polls should last longer than a day, because not everyone comes on every day.
Make groups of 6. Have 66 entries, 11 groups. Winners of these then go head-to-head, or you could take two from each group of 6. 1v1 on every poll is going to take too long, and will fill up at least 2 pages of the polls section. Not every heat will get voted on.
That fails, I'm not ballsing it up like you.
A final has TWO people in it, not three you ass.
Besides, where did I say put 3 people in a final applying it to your beauty pagent?
That is why I said I'll run it like the Uefa cup. I don't care if you don't like football, you should've asked. My Pageant, my rules.
looking at other peoples pictures, mine looks too small
resized..
resized..
>.< Just stop talking you're retarded.CammRobb wrote:
You can't have 66 entrants if you want 2 in the final.
That is why I said I'll run it like the Uefa cup. I don't care if you don't like football, you should've asked. My Pageant, my rules.
No, I'm not. Maths motherfucker, do you know it?Finray wrote:
>.< Just stop talking you're retarded.CammRobb wrote:
You can't have 66 entrants if you want 2 in the final.
That is why I said I'll run it like the Uefa cup. I don't care if you don't like football, you should've asked. My Pageant, my rules.
I didn't give 66 as a definite number, you can take as many as you fucking want, I was making an example. I didn't put any thought into it. But since you want to continue this debate, I think I will.CammRobb wrote:
No, I'm not. Maths motherfucker, do you know it?Finray wrote:
>.< Just stop talking you're retarded.CammRobb wrote:
You can't have 66 entrants if you want 2 in the final.
That is why I said I'll run it like the Uefa cup. I don't care if you don't like football, you should've asked. My Pageant, my rules.
66 entrants.
11 rounds of 6 entrants. 2 with the most go through to next round.
22 entrants. Group of 5, group of 5, group of 6 group of 6. First two from each round go through, 8 entrants.
4 1v1s, 4 entrants. 2 1v1s, 2 entrants. 1 1v1, winner.
Yeah it's not perfect, but it works. You can start with any number, you don't have to model it on some pish football competition.
No, it has to be 1v1 the entire way.Finray wrote:
I didn't give 66 as a definite number, you can take as many as you fucking want, I was making an example. I didn't put any thought into it. But since you want to continue this debate, I think I will.CammRobb wrote:
No, I'm not. Maths motherfucker, do you know it?Finray wrote:
>.< Just stop talking you're retarded.
66 entrants.
11 rounds of 6 entrants. 2 with the most go through to next round.
22 entrants. Group of 5, group of 5, group of 6 group of 6. First two from each round go through, 8 entrants.
4 1v1s, 4 entrants. 2 1v1s, 2 entrants. 1 1v1, winner.
Yeah it's not perfect, but it works. You can start with any number, you don't have to model it on some pish football competition.
Pish football competition that works...Finray wrote:
I didn't give 66 as a definite number, you can take as many as you fucking want, I was making an example. I didn't put any thought into it. But since you want to continue this debate, I think I will.CammRobb wrote:
No, I'm not. Maths motherfucker, do you know it?Finray wrote:
>.< Just stop talking you're retarded.
66 entrants.
11 rounds of 6 entrants. 2 with the most go through to next round.
22 entrants. Group of 5, group of 5, group of 6 group of 6. First two from each round go through, 8 entrants.
4 1v1s, 4 entrants. 2 1v1s, 2 entrants. 1 1v1, winner.
Yeah it's not perfect, but it works. You can start with any number, you don't have to model it on some pish football competition.
No, it's done my way.
Your way is best CammCammRobb wrote:
Pish football competition that works...Finray wrote:
I didn't give 66 as a definite number, you can take as many as you fucking want, I was making an example. I didn't put any thought into it. But since you want to continue this debate, I think I will.CammRobb wrote:
No, I'm not. Maths motherfucker, do you know it?
66 entrants.
11 rounds of 6 entrants. 2 with the most go through to next round.
22 entrants. Group of 5, group of 5, group of 6 group of 6. First two from each round go through, 8 entrants.
4 1v1s, 4 entrants. 2 1v1s, 2 entrants. 1 1v1, winner.
Yeah it's not perfect, but it works. You can start with any number, you don't have to model it on some pish football competition.
No, it's done my way.
I know, ta.what9k wrote:
Your way is best CammCammRobb wrote:
Pish football competition that works...Finray wrote:
I didn't give 66 as a definite number, you can take as many as you fucking want, I was making an example. I didn't put any thought into it. But since you want to continue this debate, I think I will.
66 entrants.
11 rounds of 6 entrants. 2 with the most go through to next round.
22 entrants. Group of 5, group of 5, group of 6 group of 6. First two from each round go through, 8 entrants.
4 1v1s, 4 entrants. 2 1v1s, 2 entrants. 1 1v1, winner.
Yeah it's not perfect, but it works. You can start with any number, you don't have to model it on some pish football competition.
No, it's done my way.
Roger that..teddy..jimmy wrote:
http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak … 1470_n.jpgJenspm wrote:
I demand an obligatory swimsuit photo shoot.
At least for Bevo, James and teddy <3
yessir
All you guys not wanting to go up against Ted or James, have you no confidence!? Have you no self-esteem!??
I'll go up against them!
Spoiler (highlight to read):
And lose miserably, but hey, I'd rather lose to one of them! ..even if it is a shutout
Oh and no I really don't wanna go up against either of them. Just do a random drawing or whatever.
I'll go up against them!
Spoiler (highlight to read):
And lose miserably, but hey, I'd rather lose to one of them! ..even if it is a shutout
Oh and no I really don't wanna go up against either of them. Just do a random drawing or whatever.
Last edited by mtb0minime (2009-08-27 11:49:03)
I have nudes, I can't lose.
But we know this is a popularity contest; the results are already in.
But we know this is a popularity contest; the results are already in.
The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families
wat religious clothingghettoperson wrote:
I'm not sure, they just seem like opposites. You know, on one hand following the religious dress code, but on the other dressing kinda 'rebelliously', if you will. I don't know, I'm just sayin'...
goonies is awsm lolGooners wrote:
wat religious clothingghettoperson wrote:
I'm not sure, they just seem like opposites. You know, on one hand following the religious dress code, but on the other dressing kinda 'rebelliously', if you will. I don't know, I'm just sayin'...
Yer turban.Gooners wrote:
wat religious clothingghettoperson wrote:
I'm not sure, they just seem like opposites. You know, on one hand following the religious dress code, but on the other dressing kinda 'rebelliously', if you will. I don't know, I'm just sayin'...
So I can't dress like I want?Finray wrote:
Yer turban.Gooners wrote:
wat religious clothingghettoperson wrote:
I'm not sure, they just seem like opposites. You know, on one hand following the religious dress code, but on the other dressing kinda 'rebelliously', if you will. I don't know, I'm just sayin'...
No, he was making a comparison, because you wear both a religious necessity, and casual clothes.Gooners wrote:
So I can't dress like I want?Finray wrote:
Yer turban.Gooners wrote:
wat religious clothing
He put it sorta like the clothes you had on were rebeleous, which they're not, but if you were a total goth kid with big black boots and leather AND wore a turban then I could see where he would be getting the irony from.
No disrespekt is meant.
Nah I didn't take it wrong, lol. Ite seen bruvs xxFinray wrote:
No, he was making a comparison, because you wear both a religious necessity, and casual clothes.Gooners wrote:
So I can't dress like I want?Finray wrote:
Yer turban.
He put it sorta like the clothes you had on were rebeleous, which they're not, but if you were a total goth kid with big black boots and leather AND wore a turban then I could see where he would be getting the irony from.
No disrespekt is meant.
It's only half popularity. I only got one vote on the popularity contest (<3 zeek), but people seem to respond positively to my pictures, so ehh.Pochsy wrote:
I have nudes, I can't lose.
But we know this is a popularity contest; the results are already in.
I'm fooked thenPochsy wrote:
I have nudes, I can't lose.
But we know this is a popularity contest; the results are already in.
I'm out
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
this is becoming really gay. not as in a gay idea, but gay as in gay.
Would homosexual be the word you're looking for?Red Forman wrote:
this is becoming really gay. not as in a gay idea, but gay as in gay.
