How fast have you gone in a car?

2009-08-13 13:21:53

#101

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6717

Red Forman wrote:
too fast to look at the speedometer.

V-Tech just kicked in yo.

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2009-08-13 13:28:24

#102

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|6668

Ages ago on my 94 3000GT going over 140mph before cars started slowing me down.

2009-08-13 15:08:08

#103

JahManRed: wank; +646|6629|IRELAND

120 something mph in my Ex boss's BMW something whole way from Belfast to Dublin.

2009-08-13 15:14:42

#104

lettuce: site lurkerer; +26|6644|cheshire u.k

ghettoperson wrote:
1927 wrote:
lettuce wrote:
had a dodge commando up to about 80mph on the autobahn once,was a 39 seater coach,empty of course.felt quite good actually,lol
lol at that
Once I Google'd Dodge Commando, I too lol'd.

For those who are too lazy:

http://fire-engine-photos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/4238.jpg

was a coach not the fire truck mate.

if i wasnt too pee'd i wud put a pic of it up

Last edited by lettuce (2009-08-13 15:15:58)

2009-08-13 15:23:49

#105

Janis_Petke: \m/(><)\m/; +49|6694|Brunei Darussalam

Too fast for my driving skills...

2009-08-13 16:34:55

#106

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6568|NYC / Hamburg

257km/h according to the speedometer which tends to lag behind the real value by about 5-6%. The car should be electronically limited to 250km/h

tbh going really fast in a straight line is rather boring. Curvy mountain roads is where the fun is at.

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2009-08-13 16:40:55

#107

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5586

Ilocano wrote:
Ages ago on my 94 3000GT going over 140mph before cars started slowing me down.

I assume the VR-4 right?

2009-08-13 17:17:11

#108

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6650

lettuce wrote:
ghettoperson wrote:
1927 wrote:

lol at that
Once I Google'd Dodge Commando, I too lol'd.

For those who are too lazy:

http://fire-engine-photos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/4238.jpg
was a coach not the fire truck mate.

if i wasnt too pee'd i wud put a pic of it up

Yeah but the basic vehicle is the same I think. There weren't that many decent photos on Image Search to choose from.

2009-08-13 18:58:27

#109

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|6668

Macbeth wrote:
Ilocano wrote:
Ages ago on my 94 3000GT going over 140mph before cars started slowing me down.
I assume the VR-4 right?

Nah, just the regular non-turbo. But it was still a pretty fast car and took the turns well. Sweetest feeling was taking that hill on the 805 southbound in San Diego, just pass the freeway heading toward SeaWorld. I'd take the right most lane, and just literary climb that hill with no effort whatsoever, smoking everyone in sight. I could have probably taken that car around 150mph+, but no clear roads to risk it. It was hard to let go of that car. Got plenty of horizontal action with that car...

2009-08-13 20:38:54

#110

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6581|the dank(super) side of Oregon

135mph (217km/h) in my Merkur XR4Ti.

150mph (241km/h) in my S2000.

ah, to be young and stupid.

2009-08-13 20:42:46

#111

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6498

Reciprocity wrote:
XR4Ti

lol xr4ti |_()|_ XR4TI

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/21025/lol-pd.jpg

not unless your XR4 TOWTRUCK was doin 136 . . .

Last edited by burnzz (2009-08-13 20:44:38)

2009-08-13 20:57:45

#112

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5586

Ilocano wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Ilocano wrote:
Ages ago on my 94 3000GT going over 140mph before cars started slowing me down.
I assume the VR-4 right?
Nah, just the regular non-turbo. But it was still a pretty fast car and took the turns well. Sweetest feeling was taking that hill on the 805 southbound in San Diego, just pass the freeway heading toward SeaWorld. I'd take the right most lane, and just literary climb that hill with no effort whatsoever, smoking everyone in sight. I could have probably taken that car around 150mph+, but no clear roads to risk it. It was hard to let go of that car. Got plenty of horizontal action with that car...

/jealous

Lucky bastard 3000 GT were before my time and finding any in good condition for a reasonable amount is damned near impossible. You could get around 150. Though if it were up to me I would have gotten the 92 3000 so that I could get the old style headlights.

What color was yours?

Last edited by Macbeth (2009-08-13 21:09:14)

2009-08-13 21:08:10

#113

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6581|the dank(super) side of Oregon

burnzz wrote:
Reciprocity wrote:
XR4Ti
lol xr4ti |_()|_ XR4TI

http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/21025/lol-pd.jpg

not unless your XR4 TOWTRUCK was doin 136 . . .

I have a hard time saying no to turbocharged cars. I'd probably still have it if my stepfather hadn't torn the door off the car at a gas station.

2009-08-13 21:18:25

#114

13urnzz: Banned; +5,830|6498

Reciprocity wrote:
I have a hard time saying no to turbocharged cars.

ok, i guess i need to preface my previous post with: "you actually bought an XR4Ti?"
in my experience, it (the car) was a cool concept that failed in application - like the 'Star Wars' program that was conceived of @ the same time.
'80's tech that should've been red-lighted by the production team.

i will believe you buried the speedometer, i'm surprised the tachometer didn't pop out of the dash board.

2009-08-13 21:37:06

#115

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6581|the dank(super) side of Oregon

it was $800. spent another $500 rebuilding the engine. The interior was falling apart but the body and paint was in good shape. It was a fun beater and great on Oregon backroads, even with a worn suspension. RWD, 4 wheel independent suspension, 5 speed manual, 185hp turbocharged engine. it was an amusing car.

2009-08-14 02:44:24