Personally I think it makes sense: it is logic.
If green people came from mars with the intent of killing us, would we profile them?
If green people came from mars with the intent of killing us, would we profile them?
I suppose you believe Phrenology is logical, also?
Depends. If you're talking about racially profiling Muslim terrorists it's pretty hard since they have managed to get pretty much every race under their umbrella
The guy that did the most damage in the London bombings was a black man from Jamaica or some shit like that
There's plenty of white, as in white European people who have been caught trying to do crazy Islamic shit.
It's a tough cookie
It depends entirely on the circumstances really..
The guy that did the most damage in the London bombings was a black man from Jamaica or some shit like that
There's plenty of white, as in white European people who have been caught trying to do crazy Islamic shit.
It's a tough cookie
It depends entirely on the circumstances really..
I personally think it's a waste of time and only means that innocent people get harassed because they fall into a certain category. And as Mek pointed out, not all Islamic terrorists are Middle Eastern.
I don't see how you can even compare the two. You are just throwing about punchy comments without making any point.AussieReaper wrote:
I suppose you believe Phrenology is logical, also?
True, the danger from a security stand point would be discounting the possibility of risk form another race. I think racial profiling should be used, but periodically evaluated for validity.Mekstizzle wrote:
Depends. If you're talking about racially profiling Muslim terrorists it's pretty hard since they have managed to get pretty much every race under their umbrella
The guy that did the most damage in the London bombings was a black man from Jamaica or some shit like that
There's plenty of white, as in white European people who have been caught trying to do crazy Islamic shit.
It's a tough cookie
It depends entirely on the circumstances really..
Last edited by Swan (2009-07-28 05:56:34)
Same race = same traits.Swan wrote:
I don't see how you can even compare the two. You are just throwing about punchy comments without making any point.AussieReaper wrote:
I suppose you believe Phrenology is logical, also?
Same skull = same traits.
That's how I can compare the two. Both are archaic and totally flawed in the real world.
Then there are playing the odds that most are.ghettoperson wrote:
I personally think it's a waste of time and only means that innocent people get harassed because they fall into a certain category. And as Mek pointed out, not all Islamic terrorists are Middle Eastern.
I completely agree with race profiling. If it were a white serial killer on the loose, you would not be checking out black people, AND you wouldn't have a problem with it. It works both ways.
That's a mobile vision you have there +1. Its called statistics.El Beardo wrote:
What logic?? Everyone who looks the same is the same? I don't think that is very logical, I think it is ignorant.Swan wrote:
Personally I think it makes sense: it is logic.
If I asked you to go find all of the Willy Nelson albums you could find, what race would you start with? (inb4screenshotofnotorious)
Last edited by Swan (2009-07-28 06:00:33)
If you can show that all people of a particular race think in a particular way then yes.
As they don't the answer is no.
Although, I'd suggest using the race, religion, political affiliations and career profile of the single most effective terrorist to hit the US so far.
As they don't the answer is no.
Although, I'd suggest using the race, religion, political affiliations and career profile of the single most effective terrorist to hit the US so far.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-07-28 06:00:57)
Fuck Israel
Except that this is like harassing white people because there might be a serial killer on the loose.lowing wrote:
Then there are playing the odds that most are.ghettoperson wrote:
I personally think it's a waste of time and only means that innocent people get harassed because they fall into a certain category. And as Mek pointed out, not all Islamic terrorists are Middle Eastern.
I completely agree with race profiling. If it were a white serial killer on the loose, you would not be checking out black people, AND you wouldn't have a problem with it. It works both ways.
And saying they are white so MUST have serial killer tenancies.ghettoperson wrote:
Except that this is like harassing white people because there might be a serial killer on the loose.lowing wrote:
Then there are playing the odds that most are.ghettoperson wrote:
I personally think it's a waste of time and only means that innocent people get harassed because they fall into a certain category. And as Mek pointed out, not all Islamic terrorists are Middle Eastern.
I completely agree with race profiling. If it were a white serial killer on the loose, you would not be checking out black people, AND you wouldn't have a problem with it. It works both ways.
Thats not racial profiling.lowing wrote:
If it were a white serial killer on the loose, you would not be checking out black people
But the majority of serial killers are white, so white people are more dangerous than black people and must be watched.Aussiereaper wrote:
And saying they are white so MUST have serial killer tenancies.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-07-28 06:04:07)
Fuck Israel
That too.Dilbert_X wrote:
Thats not racial profiling.If it were a white serial killer on the loose, you would not be checking out black people
Yea. McVay was a bastard, but he paled in comprison to the 9-11 fuck wits.Dilbert_X wrote:
If you can show that all people of a particular race think in a particular way then yes.
As they don't the answer is no.
Although, I'd suggest using the race, religion, political affiliations and career profile of the single most effective terrorist to hit the US so far.
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj25 … cveigh.jpg
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Now this is bullshit, race profiling has nothing to do with the suggestion that ALL people of that race are considered guilty of anything.Dilbert_X wrote:
If you can show that all people of a particular race think in a particular way then yes.
As they don't the answer is no.
Although, I'd suggest using the race, religion, political affiliations and career profile of the single most effective terrorist to hit the US so far.
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj25 … cveigh.jpg
It is nothing more than a decription of the subject they are looking for.
we have a problem with Middle Eastern men trying to carry out terrorist acts in the US. So we watch them closer at airports etc. I can promise you, the second 80 year old blue hairs start becoming a threat, we will profile them and keep a closer eye on them. I promise.
No race is beyond profiling, therefore it is NOT a race issue.
really? you guys were up in arms with the notion that the Gates 911 caller might have described the people that were breaking into his house as black, she was labeled as racist for it.ghettoperson wrote:
That too.Dilbert_X wrote:
Thats not racial profiling.If it were a white serial killer on the loose, you would not be checking out black people
really? and why not. If a white serial killer was suspected to be trying to fly out of the country, the cops would be scrutinizing white people at the airports. How is this not racial profiling? or is your position that white people can not be profiled.
NO.
Only cos the lowing police would harass me and ATG would give me the dirties all day.
Only cos the lowing police would harass me and ATG would give me the dirties all day.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
I wasn't up in arms about it, I don't care. In fact, I don't really know what you're talking about, I'm guessing that black dude that got arrested for 'breaking in' to his own house?lowing wrote:
really? you guys were up in arms with the notion that the Gates 911 caller might have described the people that were breaking into his house as black, she was labeled as racist for it.ghettoperson wrote:
That too.Dilbert_X wrote:
Thats not racial profiling.
Because if there is a serial killer going around who is white, then it's not racial profiling, that's using evidence that they know. The same goes if he were a black serial killer, before you go off about that. Racial profiling is assuming that at serial killer will be white, and so stopping white people to see if they are serial killers, without a crime being committed.really? and why not. If a white serial killer was suspected to be trying to fly out of the country, the cops would be scrutinizing white people at the airports. How is this not racial profiling? or is your position that white people can not be profiled.
nobody is watching ALL black people. So this pretty much is also bullshitDilbert_X wrote:
Thats not racial profiling.lowing wrote:
If it were a white serial killer on the loose, you would not be checking out black peopleBut the majority of serial killers are white, so white people are more dangerous than black people and must be watched.Aussiereaper wrote:
And saying they are white so MUST have serial killer tenancies.
News flash, it is ASSUMED a serial killer will be white, ya know why, because most of them ARE white. So what now, am I no racist against white people? nobody is stopping all black people without a crime being comitted. Just black people who fit the description.ghettoperson wrote:
I wasn't up in arms about it, I don't care. In fact, I don't really know what you're talking about, I'm guessing that black dude that got arrested for 'breaking in' to his own house?lowing wrote:
really? you guys were up in arms with the notion that the Gates 911 caller might have described the people that were breaking into his house as black, she was labeled as racist for it.ghettoperson wrote:
That too.Because if there is a serial killer going around who is white, then it's not racial profiling, that's using evidence that they know. The same goes if he were a black serial killer, before you go off about that. Racial profiling is assuming that at serial killer will be white, and so stopping white people to see if they are serial killers, without a crime being committed.really? and why not. If a white serial killer was suspected to be trying to fly out of the country, the cops would be scrutinizing white people at the airports. How is this not racial profiling? or is your position that white people can not be profiled.
If you get knocked out with a body blow, will never protect your face again?Dilbert_X wrote:
If you can show that all people of a particular race think in a particular way then yes.
As they don't the answer is no.
Although, I'd suggest using the race, religion, political affiliations and career profile of the singel most effective terrorist to hit the US so far.
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj25 … cveigh.jpg
You appear to not understand what racial profiling is. It isn't searching for a black man who is 6'3" with a scar on his left arm, after a liquor store gets robbed. It's examining people of a certain background (these days Muslim, 15 years ago it was Irish) and pulling them aside for extra questioning and searching because they believe that Muslims/the Irish are more likely to commit terrorist acts.lowing wrote:
News flash, it is ASSUMED a serial killer will be white, ya know why, because most of them ARE white. So what now, am I no racist against white people? nobody is stopping all black people without a crime being comitted. Just black people who fit the description.ghettoperson wrote:
I wasn't up in arms about it, I don't care. In fact, I don't really know what you're talking about, I'm guessing that black dude that got arrested for 'breaking in' to his own house?lowing wrote:
really? you guys were up in arms with the notion that the Gates 911 caller might have described the people that were breaking into his house as black, she was labeled as racist for it.Because if there is a serial killer going around who is white, then it's not racial profiling, that's using evidence that they know. The same goes if he were a black serial killer, before you go off about that. Racial profiling is assuming that at serial killer will be white, and so stopping white people to see if they are serial killers, without a crime being committed.really? and why not. If a white serial killer was suspected to be trying to fly out of the country, the cops would be scrutinizing white people at the airports. How is this not racial profiling? or is your position that white people can not be profiled.
I coulda swore I just stated, that it is ASSUMED white peolpe would be a serila killer because MOST serial killers are white.ghettoperson wrote:
You appear to not understand what racial profiling is. It isn't searching for a black man who is 6'3" with a scar on his left arm, after a liquor store gets robbed. It's examining people of a certain background (these days Muslim, 15 years ago it was Irish) and pulling them aside for extra questioning and searching because they believe that Muslims/the Irish are more likely to commit terrorist acts.lowing wrote:
News flash, it is ASSUMED a serial killer will be white, ya know why, because most of them ARE white. So what now, am I no racist against white people? nobody is stopping all black people without a crime being comitted. Just black people who fit the description.ghettoperson wrote:
I wasn't up in arms about it, I don't care. In fact, I don't really know what you're talking about, I'm guessing that black dude that got arrested for 'breaking in' to his own house?lowing wrote:
really? you guys were up in arms with the notion that the Gates 911 caller might have described the people that were breaking into his house as black, she was labeled as racist for it.
Because if there is a serial killer going around who is white, then it's not racial profiling, that's using evidence that they know. The same goes if he were a black serial killer, before you go off about that. Racial profiling is assuming that at serial killer will be white, and so stopping white people to see if they are serial killers, without a crime being committed.
Let me check, yup I DID justr say that. Is it racial profiling or isn't it?
Do you mean WHITE IRISH people.? Sounds like no one is exempt and there fore is a tool that is used and is NOT racially biased against any specific race.
If I'd spent the last few decades punching the crap out of people of a particular race I wouldn't be too surprised if one turned around and punched me back.If you get knocked out with a body blow, will never protect your face again?
Also I wouldn't then go around punching people just because they were the same race as the person who last punched me. That would be puerile and provocative.
Alternatively if you want to follow your argument, white, republican, US military veterans who are members of the NRA should be profiled and targeted as they are apparently more dangerous than moslem terrorists.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-07-28 06:37:19)
Fuck Israel
No one is doing that, you really need to find an argument to support your position that is a little closer to reality if not back down on this planet.Dilbert_X wrote:
If I'd spent the last few decades punching the crap out of people of a particular race I wouldn't be too surprised if one turned around and punched me back.If you get knocked out with a body blow, will never protect your face again?
Also I wouldn't then go around punching people just because they were the same race as the person who last punched me. That would be puerile and provocative.