I thought ruining the life of a human being right from the start and possibly influencing him to be gay too is a fucking crime against humanity.Bertster7 wrote:
Why not?Dilbert_X wrote:
Let them get on with it, provided they don't get married couples tax allowance or adopt kids.
Unless they'd like to support 'single white male' tax allowance.
Surely a gay couple should be entitled to the same rights as a heterosexual one?
Why shouldn't they be allowed to adopt kids?
well aren't you all sunshine and rosesIoan92 wrote:
I thought ruining the life of a human being right from the start and possibly influencing him to be gay too is a fucking crime against humanity.Bertster7 wrote:
Why not?Dilbert_X wrote:
Let them get on with it, provided they don't get married couples tax allowance or adopt kids.
Unless they'd like to support 'single white male' tax allowance.
Surely a gay couple should be entitled to the same rights as a heterosexual one?
Why shouldn't they be allowed to adopt kids?
tbh
Last edited by Longbow (2009-07-26 05:12:07)
Fearing homosexuals is often a sign of ones own insecurity in his or her own sexual preferences.RavyGravy wrote:
you guys really need to re-think your opinion on homosexuals, grow up and stop treating them like they are something to be feared.
They can be as gay as they want but they honestly shouldn't get children. The kids will be picked at in school and maybe even get beaten up due to having gay fathers.RavyGravy wrote:
you guys really need to re-think your opinion on homosexuals, grow up and stop treating them like they are something to be feared.
What if one of them was a post-op with a tuck job?Zefar wrote:
They can be as gay as they want but they honestly shouldn't get children. The kids will be picked at in school and maybe even get beaten up due to having gay fathers.RavyGravy wrote:
you guys really need to re-think your opinion on homosexuals, grow up and stop treating them like they are something to be feared.
Yeah where the hell is my lesbian pride parade!jsnipy wrote:
I believe homosexuality is not to be condemned or celebrated. Except two hot lesbians of course, this should be celebrated.
Tax breaks for married couples are to help them raise children, not so they can have more money.Bertster wrote:
Surely a gay couple should be entitled to the same rights as a heterosexual one?
By celebrated you mean filmed?jsnipy wrote:
Except two hot lesbians of course, this should be celebrated.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-07-26 05:57:06)
it was so loud you hear it on another floor.Switch wrote:
I bet you were against the wall with a glass to your ear knocking one out.m3thod wrote:
at uni i once heard 2 benders bumming each other. it was all a bit caveman-ish.
they should be beheaded amirite?m3thod wrote:
it was so loud you hear it on another floor.Switch wrote:
I bet you were against the wall with a glass to your ear knocking one out.m3thod wrote:
at uni i once heard 2 benders bumming each other. it was all a bit caveman-ish.
and i'm only gay for you lukey baby.
Last edited by some_random_panda (2009-07-26 06:09:58)
if you have something to say, just come out with it!AussieReaper wrote:
What if one of them was a post-op with a tuck job?Zefar wrote:
They can be as gay as they want but they honestly shouldn't get children. The kids will be picked at in school and maybe even get beaten up due to having gay fathers.RavyGravy wrote:
you guys really need to re-think your opinion on homosexuals, grow up and stop treating them like they are something to be feared.
Because the kids will catch the gay, dammit!Bertster7 wrote:
Why not?Dilbert_X wrote:
Let them get on with it, provided they don't get married couples tax allowance or adopt kids.
Unless they'd like to support 'single white male' tax allowance.
Surely a gay couple should be entitled to the same rights as a heterosexual one?
Why shouldn't they be allowed to adopt kids?
Alright... here's a compromise Dilbert.Bertster7 wrote:
Why not?Dilbert_X wrote:
Let them get on with it, provided they don't get married couples tax allowance or adopt kids.
Unless they'd like to support 'single white male' tax allowance.
Surely a gay couple should be entitled to the same rights as a heterosexual one?
Why shouldn't they be allowed to adopt kids?
No one has a right to force me to subsidize the kids of any couple, gay or straight.Dilbert_X wrote:
Tax breaks for married couples are to help them raise children, not so they can have more money.Bertster wrote:
Surely a gay couple should be entitled to the same rights as a heterosexual one?
Having kids is not a right, if they can't produce them themselves then hard luck.
No-one has a 'right' to adopt kids.
I do think the intent originally was to promote, and not discourage, procreation. It's the incentve to continue the human race I guess.Turquoise wrote:
No one has a right to force me to subsidize the kids of any couple, gay or straight.Dilbert_X wrote:
Tax breaks for married couples are to help them raise children, not so they can have more money.Bertster wrote:
Surely a gay couple should be entitled to the same rights as a heterosexual one?
Having kids is not a right, if they can't produce them themselves then hard luck.
No-one has a 'right' to adopt kids.
Seeing as how the majority of the world procreates without any economic incentives, I don't see why we must put them in place.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I do think the intent originally was to promote, and not discourage, procreation. It's the incentve to continue the human race I guess.Turquoise wrote:
No one has a right to force me to subsidize the kids of any couple, gay or straight.Dilbert_X wrote:
Tax breaks for married couples are to help them raise children, not so they can have more money.
Having kids is not a right, if they can't produce them themselves then hard luck.
No-one has a 'right' to adopt kids.
