Its easy to use with little effort and has variations of songs (covers/string or orchestral versions) not easily found elsewhere. I'm not a serious music listener; it works fine for me.Freezer7Pro wrote:
I don't find Youtube the optimal music browser/library/player.nukchebi0 wrote:
What is that supposed to mean?Freezer7Pro wrote:
@nukchebi0: I'm just surprised that you don't get annoyed at navigating your music.
EAX is pretty much old tech. It doesn't go along well with Vista, and thus, as far as I know, isn't used at all. As for positional sound, EAX doesn't really do much with that. EAX tends to add some reverb in buildings and trenches, but that's pretty much it.james@alienware wrote:
But you can't disregard EAX. If you have Dolby-capable headphones then the Xonars are definitely the card of choice, even for gaming. But for example the positional sound (which is essential in gaming) is slightly less well produced by the Xonars.
Yeah, that shouldn't have happened with his drivers. That's the thing, the cards are good, just the drivers and support are shit.
And no matter what, the Xonars can do EAX. It works really well, too.
And no, Creative's cards aren't good. They're very poorly designed, and they even manage to bottleneck their own chips pretty badly when compared to Auzentech. And even so, The DX is better than the most expensive of Creative's offerings.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-07-20 13:37:10)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
What do you mean they are not used in vista?Freezer7Pro wrote:
EAX is pretty much old tech. It doesn't go along well with Vista, and thus, as far as I know, isn't used at all. As for positional sound, EAX doesn't really do much with that. EAX tends to add some reverb in buildings and trenches, but that's pretty much it.
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Yeah what, it is used in Vista!
+ Xonar mainly supports EAX 3 and some 4. Whereas the creative cards (and some of the latest games) use EAX 5. Yes the Auzentech card may be better designed and the Xonars are good, but they are far from a perfect card.
+ Xonar mainly supports EAX 3 and some 4. Whereas the creative cards (and some of the latest games) use EAX 5. Yes the Auzentech card may be better designed and the Xonars are good, but they are far from a perfect card.
Vista handles sound in another way than the earlier Windows versions, which made EAX fuck over. But I just checked, and it seems they managed to put it back in again a while ago, so my point was flawed.Beduin wrote:
What do you mean they are not used in vista?Freezer7Pro wrote:
EAX is pretty much old tech. It doesn't go along well with Vista, and thus, as far as I know, isn't used at all. As for positional sound, EAX doesn't really do much with that. EAX tends to add some reverb in buildings and trenches, but that's pretty much it.
That still doesn't make the Creative card a perfect card. If the Auzens and Xonars are 'good', the Creative is 'okay' at most.james@alienware wrote:
Yeah what, it is used in Vista!
+ Xonar mainly supports EAX 3 and some 4. Whereas the creative cards (and some of the latest games) use EAX 5. Yes the Auzentech card may be better designed and the Xonars are good, but they are far from a perfect card.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-07-20 16:47:09)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
No no... But they are definitely not (not good). They are goodFreezer7Pro wrote:
That still doesn't make the Creative card a perfect card. If the Auzens and Xonars are 'good', the Creative is 'okay' at most.
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
No, Creative are not good compared to the rest. They used to be ok, but that ended about when the X-Fi range (and some competition) came around.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-07-20 17:26:35)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Do you have data specifications some where? would be very nice. The ones I have been looking at are pretty much the same except for signal-to-noise rating
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Creative don't release specifications, but from what I've been able to find out about your card, it's a pretty poor performer. Low rolloff starts at 100Hz and high at about 17kHz, -0.5dB at about 50Hz and 20kHz. THD seems to lie at around 0.003%. Compared to a Xonar that's flat down to 2-3Hz and up to about 40kHz with 0.0007% THD, it isn't really great.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
So, I want to buy a headset. I was thinking the G35 would be good, but it's a USB plug-in. That means it wouldn't use my sound card, which is a bad thing, right? My sound card is a Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer 7.1, which I got purely for Battlefield 2 to use the Ultra High sound quality.
I still want to use the Ultra High sound quality, but would Battlefield 2 still play sounds in Ultra High quality even if I have USB headphones?
Thanks.
I still want to use the Ultra High sound quality, but would Battlefield 2 still play sounds in Ultra High quality even if I have USB headphones?
Thanks.
Can you pin point differences more accurate? link?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Creative don't release specifications, but from what I've been able to find out about your card, it's a pretty poor performer. Low rolloff starts at 100Hz and high at about 17kHz, -0.5dB at about 50Hz and 20kHz. THD seems to lie at around 0.003%. Compared to a Xonar that's flat down to 2-3Hz and up to about 40kHz with 0.0007% THD, it isn't really great.
thanks God I dont have "Audio" ears, cause It sounds pretty nice.
Ever had creative? heard it? Cause am no pro, but I know for sure one have to lesson before judging.
Last edited by Beduin (2009-07-20 19:31:11)
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Lol, the problem arises when you hear something better.Beduin wrote:
thanks God I dont have "Audio" ears, cause It sounds pretty nice.
G35 is the secks. Epic sound, really fun voice modding function, very clear mic. Only problem is they aren't very durable and you have a high chance of accidentally pulling it apart by just putting it on and need to spend $20 on Billy Mays' Mighty Putty to fix it.HaiBai wrote:
So, I want to buy a headset. I was thinking the G35 would be good, but it's a USB plug-in. That means it wouldn't use my sound card, which is a bad thing, right? My sound card is a Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer 7.1, which I got purely for Battlefield 2 to use the Ultra High sound quality.
I still want to use the Ultra High sound quality, but would Battlefield 2 still play sounds in Ultra High quality even if I have USB headphones?
Thanks.
tl;dr: G35 is God's headset if you are a weak bitch.
Sorry, there are no links. What I've found out is scattered all over the web, many pages into Google.Beduin wrote:
Can you pin point differences more accurate? link?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Creative don't release specifications, but from what I've been able to find out about your card, it's a pretty poor performer. Low rolloff starts at 100Hz and high at about 17kHz, -0.5dB at about 50Hz and 20kHz. THD seems to lie at around 0.003%. Compared to a Xonar that's flat down to 2-3Hz and up to about 40kHz with 0.0007% THD, it isn't really great.
thanks God I dont have "Audio" ears, cause It sounds pretty nice.
Ever had creative? heard it? Cause am no pro, but I know for sure one have to lesson before judging.
And yes, I've had a bunch of Creative sound cards. I have two 1997 Sound Blaster Lives in use right now, as a matter of fact, and they aren't too bad. Your card isn't downright bad either, but it's not really good for the money.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
^No...when ever I have some doubts about something with sound... You will find me here
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Are you sure this isn't another case of 'My gear is far better than yours, here are some abstract statistics and figures! Even if you have the same manufacturer and brand as me, my stuff is fucking vintage, Goddamn you, don't you know that old technology is always better! My immense knowledge of audio-science flips Moore's Law onto its silly motherfucking head!'.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Sorry, there are no links. What I've found out is scattered all over the web, many pages into Google.Beduin wrote:
Can you pin point differences more accurate? link?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Creative don't release specifications, but from what I've been able to find out about your card, it's a pretty poor performer. Low rolloff starts at 100Hz and high at about 17kHz, -0.5dB at about 50Hz and 20kHz. THD seems to lie at around 0.003%. Compared to a Xonar that's flat down to 2-3Hz and up to about 40kHz with 0.0007% THD, it isn't really great.
thanks God I dont have "Audio" ears, cause It sounds pretty nice.
Ever had creative? heard it? Cause am no pro, but I know for sure one have to lesson before judging.
And yes, I've had a bunch of Creative sound cards. I have two 1997 Sound Blaster Lives in use right now, as a matter of fact, and they aren't too bad. Your card isn't downright bad either, but it's not really good for the money.
For all intensive purposes, i.e gaming and listening to mp3's on a PC, there is hardly any difference between Creative and Xonar, lets be honest. Pick your brand and ride with it, the chances are that the difference will be minimal at most.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Except, that isn't what I said.Uzique wrote:
Are you sure this isn't another case of 'My gear is far better than yours, here are some abstract statistics and figures! Even if you have the same manufacturer and brand as me, my stuff is fucking vintage, Goddamn you, don't you know that old technology is always better! My immense knowledge of audio-science flips Moore's Law onto its silly motherfucking head!'.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Sorry, there are no links. What I've found out is scattered all over the web, many pages into Google.Beduin wrote:
Can you pin point differences more accurate? link?
thanks God I dont have "Audio" ears, cause It sounds pretty nice.
Ever had creative? heard it? Cause am no pro, but I know for sure one have to lesson before judging.
And yes, I've had a bunch of Creative sound cards. I have two 1997 Sound Blaster Lives in use right now, as a matter of fact, and they aren't too bad. Your card isn't downright bad either, but it's not really good for the money.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
tbh, I am pretty surprised how good the Creative Audigy Player is. It beats the bundled pci-e sound card that comes with highend Asus boards. With DanielK's modded XFi drivers its awsome. Definately good buy for the minimal price I paid of it years back.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
I just wanted to make sure it is not a personal thing Freezer has against Creative, specially when he mentioned DanielK.
Thats not how you judge electronics.
Thats not how you judge electronics.
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
How surprising, that card is just a riser for the integrated sound card.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
tbh, I am pretty surprised how good the Creative Audigy Player is. It beats the bundled pci-e sound card that comes with highend Asus boards. With DanielK's modded XFi drivers its awsome. Definately good buy for the minimal price I paid of it years back.
I don't have anything personal against Creative more than anyone else, but I don't think the way they run their marketing department is acceptable. They don't even tell you the most basic specifications, but yet have they charge a premium compared to other brands.Beduin wrote:
I just wanted to make sure it is not a personal thing Freezer has against Creative, specially when he mentioned DanielK.
Thats not how you judge electronics.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-07-22 04:28:47)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
I didn't know they integrate XFI these days? Because I was talking about the XFI one.Freezer7Pro wrote:
How surprising, that card is just a riser for the integrated sound card.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
tbh, I am pretty surprised how good the Creative Audigy Player is. It beats the bundled pci-e sound card that comes with highend Asus boards. With DanielK's modded XFi drivers its awsome. Definately good buy for the minimal price I paid of it years back.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
ASUS boards ship with X-Fi cards?GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I didn't know they integrate XFI these days? Because I was talking about the XFI one.Freezer7Pro wrote:
How surprising, that card is just a riser for the integrated sound card.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
tbh, I am pretty surprised how good the Creative Audigy Player is. It beats the bundled pci-e sound card that comes with highend Asus boards. With DanielK's modded XFi drivers its awsome. Definately good buy for the minimal price I paid of it years back.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-07-22 04:43:25)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Freezer7Pro wrote:
ASUS cards ship with X-Fi cards?GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I didn't know they integrate XFI these days? Because I was talking about the XFI one.Freezer7Pro wrote:
How surprising, that card is just a riser for the integrated sound card.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6a33/a6a33548504a4f65a7a2a923aa5b75414ede1b9a" alt="https://plaza.fi/s/f/editor/images/X-2008052613120573497.jpg"
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8