Ill ask you to not presume on how I think. Depending on the circumstances of the imaginary Palin scenario, I probably could and/or would give the benefit of a doubt. Also, how am I presenting "fake crap"?usmarine wrote:
paying you accuser 20mil so he shuts up. jesus guys. its not that hard. i mean if sarah palin had paid someone 20mil to stfu, would you give her the benefit oft he doubt? nope. sure as hell wouldnt. so get out of here with your fake crap.SplinterStrike wrote:
Why do you think MJ is a pedophile? What reasons do you have for believing in that idea?
- hush money could also be extorted money. Her lil kid got "molested" and she'd rather receive 20 million and see the guy who did it walk free? It could be either she doesnt give a shit about her son and his well-being, or MJ didnt actually do it and she just wanted the cash, or even something else.lowing wrote:
paid hush moneySplinterStrike wrote:
The question I'll ask is this:
Why do you think MJ is a pedophile? What reasons do you have for believing in that idea?
testimony of employees of the Ranch
MJ's behavior
his own admittance of sleeping with little boys.
- Given, but they came to naught as the trial proved him innocent of the crime.
- Again given, but the guy had a completely screwed childhood, though a psych evaluation would probably have been of great help in diagnosing his behavior.
- Lastly, did he sleep with them as a father would, or in the sense of having sex with them? If it were the latter, wouldnt you think there would be far more outcry?