I am sure though there are really good people there that like the US. And the media is bias towards liberalism as far as TV wise.Turquoise wrote:
I was against the invasion of Iraq, but you know... maybe we should've taken the Saddam approach. I mean, if they hate the way we actually did things, maybe we should've taken the old school "salt the earth" method. Then, they'd really have something to bitch about.... (of course, they'd all be dead and couldn't bitch then).
We've essentially sacrificed our prosperity for the sake of a country that doesn't even like us. They've spent more time making spectacles out of things like shoe throwings than actually working together.
To put it bluntly, they deserved Saddam. We should've left him there for Iran to worry about as well.
Well, I'll agree that many of them probably do like us, but the question is... how many of them in positions of power do? The Iraqi government seems somewhat that way, but a lot of the general public doesn't seem to.Warhammer wrote:
I am sure though there are really good people there that like the US. And the media is bias towards liberalism as far as TV wise.Turquoise wrote:
I was against the invasion of Iraq, but you know... maybe we should've taken the Saddam approach. I mean, if they hate the way we actually did things, maybe we should've taken the old school "salt the earth" method. Then, they'd really have something to bitch about.... (of course, they'd all be dead and couldn't bitch then).
We've essentially sacrificed our prosperity for the sake of a country that doesn't even like us. They've spent more time making spectacles out of things like shoe throwings than actually working together.
To put it bluntly, they deserved Saddam. We should've left him there for Iran to worry about as well.
It's as if these people forget that they had a homicidal maniac in charge before us. I don't even like Bush, but he's still better than Saddam.
what a stupid title to a stupid thread
It's all relative though. I'm sure many people preferred being able to walk down the street and go to work without being blown up even though there was a despot in charge. It depends what you're into.Turquoise wrote:
Well, I'll agree that many of them probably do like us, but the question is... how many of them in positions of power do? The Iraqi government seems somewhat that way, but a lot of the general public doesn't seem to.Warhammer wrote:
I am sure though there are really good people there that like the US. And the media is bias towards liberalism as far as TV wise.Turquoise wrote:
I was against the invasion of Iraq, but you know... maybe we should've taken the Saddam approach. I mean, if they hate the way we actually did things, maybe we should've taken the old school "salt the earth" method. Then, they'd really have something to bitch about.... (of course, they'd all be dead and couldn't bitch then).
We've essentially sacrificed our prosperity for the sake of a country that doesn't even like us. They've spent more time making spectacles out of things like shoe throwings than actually working together.
To put it bluntly, they deserved Saddam. We should've left him there for Iran to worry about as well.
It's as if these people forget that they had a homicidal maniac in charge before us. I don't even like Bush, but he's still better than Saddam.
rammunition wrote:
what a stupid title to a stupid thread
Good point, but damn... people that prefer security over freedom disgust me. It's why I don't like neocons either.Braddock wrote:
It's all relative though. I'm sure many people preferred being able to walk down the street and go to work without being blown up even though there was a despot in charge. It depends what you're into.Turquoise wrote:
Well, I'll agree that many of them probably do like us, but the question is... how many of them in positions of power do? The Iraqi government seems somewhat that way, but a lot of the general public doesn't seem to.Warhammer wrote:
I am sure though there are really good people there that like the US. And the media is bias towards liberalism as far as TV wise.
It's as if these people forget that they had a homicidal maniac in charge before us. I don't even like Bush, but he's still better than Saddam.
Touche... I thought the shoe was in bad taste, but they should be allowed to display it.Braddock wrote:
Freedom of speech and expression... yay!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7862180.stm
and a stupid pointless commentrammunition wrote:
what a stupid title to a stupid thread
giving money to potential suicide bombers......no
i would prefermy donations to go to people who would appreciate it
but then again the families of suicide bombers who murder israelis get blood money from hamas
it seems the message about this being a religion of peace is often forgotten........
Well, if anyone would know, ramm would...benefit wrote:
and a stupid pointless commentrammunition wrote:
what a stupid title to a stupid thread
giving money to potential suicide bombers......no
i would prefermy donations to go to people who would appreciate it
but then again the families of suicide bombers who murder israelis get blood money from hamas
it seems the message about this being a religion of peace is often forgotten........
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Pot, kettle.benefit wrote:
and a stupid pointless comment
Your post would be less pointless if it were on an active topic.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bee/78beeb000139f0d5d6c3caf1415cd42d5fac00dc" alt="https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png"
Well, first off, im not a Bush fan. The "stupid title to a stupid thread" comment bothered me a bit. Not because I used a poor choice of words to describe the event, but because the poster seemed to refuse to validate his comment. It bothers me that orphans aka people with NO FAMILY are being taught to hate America for the wrong reasons by people who were probably raised the same way. YES blame America because suicide bombers killed your parents.....
Nothing like a timely reply.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
It took you 7 minutes to come up with that.m3thod wrote:
Nothing like a timely reply.
....... watm3thod wrote:
Nothing like a timely reply.
Nothing like a timely reply
Kmafia996630 wrote:
Nothing like a timely reply
anything worthwhile to comment on?
forgive me for not reposnding within the 3 nano seconds that you expected + i think i may haven beaten the 3 months he took to reply to ramm.Lotta_Drool wrote:
It took you 7 minutes to come up with that.m3thod wrote:
Nothing like a timely reply.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Leave dead threads where they lie....K? Espically if you're going to reply to ramm...KK?Locoloki wrote:
Kmafia996630 wrote:
Nothing like a timely reply
anything worthwhile to comment on?
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
its dead because i didnt reply, or that no one cares about orphans until they become adults with bombs strapped to their chestsm3thod wrote:
Leave dead threads where they lie....K? Espically if you're going to reply to ramm...KK?Locoloki wrote:
Kmafia996630 wrote:
anything worthwhile to comment on?
Last edited by Locoloki (2009-05-04 15:33:34)
The U.S. gave them freedom. The freedom to express their feelings, freedom to make right or wrong decisions like wasting money on pointless statue(s) or waste the lives of children by converting them to would be suicide bombers . There is no bright future for a country who condone suicide bombers and or terrorism. Score 1 for freedom...maybe democracy.