max wrote:
To be a philosopher you need to talk like Uzique, so no.
Ahahaha.
Mitch you do not possess a modicum of intellectual ability, let alone enough to be a philosopher. You're being terribly reductionist about what a philosopher actually 'does'; you're simplying a huge area of human thought and knowledge into a crude teaching-equation. There's infinitely more to philosophy than this, and I don't expect you to even understand half of the fundamental concepts and elements.
Nothing personal, but teenage philosophers just don't happen. Copy and pasting arguments/thoughts from other web sources to 'create' BF2s discussion isn't quite on par with the works of Plato.
@ Teddy: Existentialism is awesome- what floats your boat? Legal Bentham-style utilitarianism? Spoonfed wank'er!
Last edited by Uzique (2009-04-03 10:25:04)